Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11835, 2024 05 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782998

ABSTRACT

Long-COVID19 has been recently associated with long-sick leave and unemployment. The autonomic nervous system functioning may be also affected by SARS-CoV-2, leading to a chronic autonomic syndrome. This latter remains widely unrecognized in clinical practice. In the present study, we assessed the occurrence of Long-COVID19 Autonomic Syndrome in a group of active workers as well as the relationships between their autonomic dysfunction and work ability. This prospective observational study was conducted during the 2nd wave of the pandemic in Italy. Forty-five patients (53.6 ± 8.4 years; 32 M) hospitalized for COVID19, were consecutively enrolled at the time of their hospital discharge (T0) and followed-up for 6 months. Autonomic symptoms and work ability were assessed by COMPASS31 and Work Ability Index questionnaires at T0, one (T1), three and six (T6) months after hospital discharge and compared to those retrospectively collected for a period preceding SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clinical examination and standing test were also performed at T1 and T6. One in three working-age people developed a new autonomic syndrome that was still evident 6 months after the acute infection resolution. This was associated with a significant reduction in the work ability. Recognition of Long-COVID19 Autonomic Syndrome may promote early intervention to facilitate return to work and prevent unemployment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Female , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/physiopathology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Prospective Studies , Italy/epidemiology , Adult , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Autonomic Nervous System Diseases/physiopathology , Autonomic Nervous System Diseases/epidemiology , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Return to Work , Autonomic Nervous System/physiopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Eur J Intern Med ; 120: 38-45, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37652756

ABSTRACT

Long-COVID syndrome is characterized by fatigue, orthostatic intolerance, tachycardia, pain, memory difficulties, and brain fog, which may be associated with autonomic nervous system abnormalities. We aimed to evaluate the short and long-term course of COVID-19 autonomic symptoms and quality of life (QoL) after SARS-CoV-2 infection through a one-year follow-up combined with validated questionnaires. Additionally, we aimed to identify patients with worsening autonomic symptoms at 6 and 12 months by dividing the patient cohort into two sub-groups: the Post-COVID healed Control sub-group (total score<16.4) and the Long-COVID autonomic syndrome sub-group (total score>16.4). This prospective cohort studied 112 SARS-CoV-2 positive patients discharged from Humanitas Research Hospital between January and March 2021. Autonomic symptoms and QoL were assessed using the composite autonomic symptom scale 31 (COMPASS-31) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaires at various time points: before SARS-CoV-2 infection (PRE), at hospital discharge (T0), and at 1 (T1), 3 (T3), 6 (T6), and 12 (T12) months of follow-up. COMPASS-31 total score, Orthostatic Intolerance and Gastrointestinal function indices, QoL, physical functioning, pain, and fatigue scores worsened at T0 compared to PRE but progressively improved at T1 and T3, reflecting the acute phase of COVID-19. Unexpectedly, these indices worsened at T6 and T12 compared to T3. Subgroup analysis revealed that 47% of patients experienced worsening autonomic symptoms at T6 and T12, indicating Long-COVID autonomic syndrome. Early rehabilitative and pharmacological therapy is recommended for patients at the T1 and T3 stages after SARS-CoV-2 infection to minimize the risk of developing long-term autonomic syndrome.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Orthostatic Intolerance , Humans , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , COVID-19/complications , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , SARS-CoV-2 , Fatigue/etiology , Pain
3.
Sci Total Environ ; 808: 152005, 2022 Feb 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34871696

ABSTRACT

An inverted U-shape relationship between cognitive performance and indoor temperature with best performance peaking at 21.6 °C was previously described. Little is known on classroom temperature reduction effects on cognitive performances and cardiac autonomic profile, during the cold season. Fifteen students underwent electrocardiogram recording during a lecture in two days in December when classroom temperatures were set as neutral (NEUTRAL, 20-22 °C) and cool (COOL, 16-18 °C). Cognitive performance (memory, verbal ability, reasoning, overall cognitive C-score) was assessed by Cambridge Brain Science cognitive evaluation tool. Cardiac autonomic control was evaluated via the analysis of spontaneous fluctuations of heart period, as the temporal distance between two successive R-wave peaks (RR). Spectral analysis provided the power in the high frequency (HF, 0.15-0.40 Hz) and low frequency (LF, 0.04-0.15 Hz) bands of RR variability. Sympatho-vagal interaction was assessed by LF to HF ratio (LF/HF). Symbolic analysis provided the fraction of RR patterns composed by three heart periods with no variation (0 V%) and two variations (2 V%), taken as markers of cardiac sympathetic and vagal modulations, respectively. The students' thermal comfort was assessed during NEUTRAL and COOL trials. Classroom temperatures were 21.5 ± 0.8 °C and 18.4 ± 0.4 °C during NEUTRAL and COOL. Memory, verbal ability, C-Score were greater during COOL (13.01 ± 3.43, 12.32 ± 2.58, 14.29 ± 2.90) compared to NEUTRAL (9.98 ± 2.26, p = 0.002; 8.57 ± 1.07, p = 0.001 and 10.35 ± 3.20, p = 0.001). LF/HF (2.4 ± 1.7) and 0 V% (23.2 ± 11.1%) were lower during COOL compared to NEUTRAL (3.7 ± 2.8, p = 0.042; 28.1 ± 12.2.1%, p = 0.031). During COOL, 2 V% was greater (30.5 ± 10.9%) compared to NEUTRAL (26.2 ± 11.3, p = 0.047). The students' thermal comfort was slightly reduced during COOL compared to NEUTRAL trial. During cold season, a better cognitive performance was obtained in a cooler indoor setting enabling therefore energy saving too.


Subject(s)
Autonomic Nervous System , Microclimate , Cognition , Heart Rate , Humans , Students
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...