[Primary aldosteronism: from diagnosis to therapy in clinical practice]. / Iperaldosteronismo primitivo: dalla diagnosi alla terapia nella pratica clinica.

Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the single most common cause of secondary hypertension and is associated with increased target organ injury. It can be can either surgically cured or treated with targeted pharmacotherapy. PA is frequently undiagnosed and untreated, leading to aldosterone-specific cardiovascular morbidity and nephrotoxicity. Thus, clinicians should perform case detection testing for PA at least once in all patients with hypertension. The diagnostic work-up of PA is a sequence of three phases comprising screening tests, confirmatory tests and the differentiation of unilateral from bilateral forms. With appropriate surgical expertise, laparoscopic unilateral adrenalectomy is safe, efficient and curative in patients with unilateral adrenal disease. In patients who have bilateral aldosterone hypersecretion, the optimal management is a low sodium diet and lifelong treatment with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist administered at a dosage to maintain a high-normal serum potassium concentration without the aid of oral potassium supplements. In patients with PA, specific treatment provides prognostic benefit over optimal antihypertensive therapy and is therefore crucial to reduce mortality and morbidity in this subgroup of patients with hypertension.

Prevalence of osteoporosis and vertebral fractures in acromegalic patients.

Growth Hormone (GH) and Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF-1) stimulate proliferation, differentiation and extracellular matrix production in osteoblastic cells. GH and IGF-1 also stimulate recruitment and bone resorption activity in osteoclastic cells. A chronic systemic GH and IGF-1 excess produces an increased bone turn over in acromegalic patients (pts). Osteoporosis, joint alterations and bone deformities have a great clinical relevance in acromegalic pts and favour mortality and morbility. In the present study we evaluate the still unclear GH/IGF-1 activity on bone, Bone Mineral Density (BMD) and risk of osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures (VF), in relation to gender and gonadal status in acromegalic pts.Twenty acromegalic pts (12 F, 8 M) ranging 26-64 years were studied. Four pts were hypogonadic (1 F, 3 M), seven women were in post-menopause (PM) and four women eugonadic. The disease was active in twelve pts and inactive in eight pts. Serum and urinary 24/hrs calcium and phosphate and serum PTH, bone formation (P1NP) and resorption (beta-CTX) markers were assayed. BMD was measured using dual energy X ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck and bone quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) at phalanges. Osteoporotic VF were assessed by antero-posterior and lateral x-ray examinations of the thoracic and lumbar spine.Serum IGF-1, calcium and phosphate and 24-hours urinary calcium were significantly higher in pts with active disease in respect to pts with inactive disease. BMD was reduced in more of 50% of pts, in each skeletal sites measured. Z-score values were lower in males than in females. VF prevalence was 39% (43% in women, 57% in men). Fractured and non-fractured pts were not significantly different for BMD, T-score and Z-score.In conclusion, VF are frequent in acromegaly and, even mild and asymptomatic, play an important role on life quality and survival, already decreased in acromegalic pts. DXA and QUS methods are not sufficient for identifying pts at risk for fracture, due to the many possible interferences (bone deformities, osteoarthritis, joint rigidity and soft tissue tickening), since BMD is just one determinant of bone fracture. In the screening of acromegalic complications, it is necessary to perform a radiographic study of the spine at the time of diagnosis and during follow up.

The ENDOTRIAL study: a spontaneous, open-label, randomized, multicenter, crossover study on the efficacy of sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: The three effective, commercially available drugs for the treatment of erectile dysfunction-sildenafil, vardenafil, and tadalafil-inhibit the same substrate, the erectolytic enzyme phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5). Although there are pharmacological differences between these three compounds, few comparative studies have been conducted to date. AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil in a randomly assigned 8-week fixed regimen. METHODS: This was a spontaneous, open-label, randomized, multicenter, crossover study where the patients were randomized to receive sildenafil 50 mg, sildenafil 100 mg, tadalafil 20 mg, or vardenafil 20 mg. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome included the posttreatment analysis of erectile function domains of the abridged International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF5+1). The secondary objectives included the analysis of peak-systolic velocities (PSVs), end-diastolic velocities (EDVs), and resistive index (RI), and the estimate of the percentage of men with normal penile hemodynamic parameters after each treatment. RESULTS: In all groups of patients taking sildenafil 50 mg, sildenafil 100 mg, tadalafil 20 mg, and vardenafil 20 mg at a frequency reflecting the common treatment regimens in real life, there was a statistically significant baseline-to-end point improvement in subjective perception of erectile function measured by IIEF5+1. When the four groups were compared, the treatments were not different in modifying IIEF5+1 and penile flow parameters. However, the within-group analysis showed that PSV improved in the sildenafil 50 mg group and that PSV together with RI significantly ameliorated in patients receiving 100 mg of sildenafil. Regression analysis confirmed an independent effect of sildenafil on hemodynamic efficacy parameters. CONCLUSIONS: An overall equivalence was demonstrated in the subjective perception of treatment benefits for all the PDE5i tested. However, sildenafil, in a dose-dependent manner, was the unique PDE5i able to ameliorate some of the penile flow parameters within the 8-week treatment period. These findings should be interpreted conservatively because of the observational nature of the study.