Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Toxicol Sci ; 156(1): 149-166, 2017 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28108664

ABSTRACT

The suitability of 4 in vitro assays, commonly used for mutagenicity and genotoxicity assessment, was investigated in relation to treatment with 14 nm citrate-stabilized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). Specifically, the Ames test was conducted without metabolic activation, where no mutagenic effects were observed. High resolution transmission electron microscopy and Cytoviva dark-field image analysis showed that AuNPs did not enter the bacterial cells, thus confirming the unreliability of the Ames test for nanoparticle mutagenicity studies. In addition, the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line was used for Comet, Chromosome aberration and Micronucleus assays. CHO cells were treated with AuNPs for 20 h at 37 °C. Cytotoxicity was not detected by cell impedance studies even though AuNP uptake was confirmed using Cytoviva image analysis. The DNA damage was statistically significant in treated cells when assessed by the Comet assay. However, minimal and nonstatistically significant chromosomal DNA damage was observed using the chromosome aberration and micronucleus assays. In this study, we showed that false positive results obtained with Comet assay may have been due to the possibility of direct contact between the residual, intracellular AuNPs and DNA during the assay procedure. Therefore, the chromosome aberration and micronucleus assays are better suited to assess the genotoxic effects of nanoparticles due to low probability of such direct contact occurring. Genotoxic effect of 14 and 20 nm citrate-stabilized, as well as, 14 nm PCOOH AuNPs were also investigated using chromosome aberration and micronucleus assays. Based on our acceptance criteria for a positive genotoxic response, none of the AuNPs were found to be genotoxic in either of these assays.


Subject(s)
Gold/toxicity , Metal Nanoparticles/toxicity , Mutagens/toxicity , Salmonella typhimurium/drug effects , Animals , Biological Transport , CHO Cells , Cell Survival/drug effects , Chemical Phenomena , Chromosome Aberrations/chemically induced , Citric Acid/chemistry , Comet Assay , Cricetulus , False Positive Reactions , Gold/chemistry , Gold/metabolism , Metal Nanoparticles/chemistry , Metal Nanoparticles/ultrastructure , Micronucleus Tests , Microscopy, Electron, Transmission , Microscopy, Fluorescence , Mutagenicity Tests , Mutagens/chemistry , Mutagens/metabolism , Particle Size , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/chemistry , Reproducibility of Results , Salmonella typhimurium/growth & development , Salmonella typhimurium/metabolism , Salmonella typhimurium/ultrastructure , Surface Properties
2.
Cell Biol Toxicol ; 32(4): 305-21, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27184667

ABSTRACT

Surface-modified gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) are nanomaterials that hold promise in drug delivery applications. In this study, the cytotoxicity, uptake, intracellular localization, and the exocytosis of citrate-stabilized (Cit-AuNP) and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-modified gold nanoparticles with the carboxyl (COOH) terminal functional group were assessed in human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) and the human caucasian hepatocytes carcinoma (Hep G2) cell systems, representing two major accumulation sites for AuNPs. The zeta (ζ)-potential measurements confirmed the negative surface charge of the AuNPs in water and in cell growth medium. The transmission electron microscopy confirmed the size and morphology of the AuNPs. Both types of AuNPs were shown to induce cytotoxic effects in cells. The Hep G2 cells were more sensitive cell type, with the COOH-PEG-AuNPs inducing the highest toxicity at higher concentrations. Dark field microscopy and TEM images revealed that the AuNPs were internalized in cells, mostly as agglomerates. TEM micrographs further revealed that the AuNPs were confined as agglomerates inside vesicle-like compartments, likely to be endosomal and lysosomal structures as well as in the cytosol, mostly as individual particles. The AuNPs were shown to remain in cellular compartments for up to 3 weeks, but thereafter, clearance of the gold nanoparticles from the cells by exocytosis was evident. The results presented in this study may therefore give an indication on the fate of AuNPs on long-term exposure to cells and may also assist in safety evaluation of AuNPs.


Subject(s)
Citric Acid/toxicity , Gold/toxicity , Hepatocytes/drug effects , Hepatocytes/metabolism , Kidney/drug effects , Kidney/metabolism , Metal Nanoparticles/toxicity , Cell Survival/drug effects , Citric Acid/chemistry , Citric Acid/pharmacokinetics , Epithelial Cells/drug effects , Epithelial Cells/metabolism , Exocytosis/drug effects , Gold/administration & dosage , Gold/chemistry , Gold/pharmacokinetics , HEK293 Cells , Hep G2 Cells , Hepatocytes/cytology , Humans , Kidney/cytology , Metal Nanoparticles/chemistry , Microscopy, Electron, Transmission , Particle Size , Polyethylene Glycols/chemistry , Polyethylene Glycols/pharmacokinetics , Polyethylene Glycols/toxicity
3.
Nanomedicine ; 10(7): 1391-9, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24709329

ABSTRACT

This review outlines and compares techniques that are currently available for the sterilization of nanoparticles and addresses the topic of endotoxin contamination. Several techniques are available for the removal of microbial contamination from nanoparticles developed for use in nanomedicine applications. These techniques include filtration, autoclaving and irradiation, as well as formaldehyde, ethylene oxide and gas plasma treatments. Of these sterilization methodologies, filtration may potentially remove microbial contamination without altering the physicochemical properties of the carrier nanoparticles, nor affecting their toxicity and functionality. However, no single process may be applied to all nanoparticle preparations and, therefore, it is recommended that each nanoparticle-drug system be validated on a case-by-case basis. From the clinical editor: This comprehensive review covers the currently available methods for removal of microbial contaminations from nanoparticles for nanomedicine applications. The review highlights the pros and cons of each available method. Authors conclude that there is no single best method and recommend a customized approach for each nanoparticle system.


Subject(s)
Drug Contamination , Microbiota , Nanoparticles , Endotoxins/isolation & purification , Ethylene Oxide/administration & dosage , Filtration , Formaldehyde/administration & dosage , Molecular Structure , Plasma Gases , X-Rays
4.
Part Fibre Toxicol ; 10: 50, 2013 Oct 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24103467

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Reliable in vitro toxicity testing is needed prior to the commencement of in vivo testing necessary for hazard identification and risk assessment of nanoparticles. In this study, the cytotoxicity and uptake of 14 nm and 20 nm citrate stabilised gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) in the bronchial epithelial cell line BEAS-2B, the Chinese hamster ovary cell line CHO, and the human embryonic kidney cell line HEK 293 were investigated. METHODS: Cytotoxicity of the AuNPs was assessed via traditional XTT-, LDH-, and ATP-based assays, followed by cell impedance studies. Dark-field imaging and hyperspectral imaging were used to confirm the uptake of AuNPs into the cells. RESULTS: Interference of the AuNPs with the XTT- and ATP-based assays was overcome through the use of cell impedance technology. AuNPs were shown to be relatively non-toxic using this methodology; nevertheless CHO cells were the most sensitive cell type with 20 nm AuNPs having the highest toxicity. Uptake of both 14 nm and 20 nm AuNPs was observed in all cell lines in a time- and cell type-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS: Using the cell impedance and dark-field hyperspectral imaging technologies, it was possible to study the toxicity of AuNPs in different cell lines and show that these cells could internalize AuNPs with their subsequent intracellular aggregation. It was also possible to show that this toxicity would not correlate with the level of uptake but it would correlate with cell-type and the size of the AuNPs. Therefore, these two label-free methodologies used in this study are suitable for in vitro studies on the effects of AuNPs, and could present themselves as appropriate and valuable methodologies for future nanoparticle toxicity and uptake studies.


Subject(s)
Citric Acid/chemistry , Epithelial Cells/drug effects , Gold/toxicity , Metal Nanoparticles/toxicity , Toxicity Tests/methods , Animals , CHO Cells , Cell Culture Techniques , Cell Survival/drug effects , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Electric Impedance , Epithelial Cells/metabolism , Epithelial Cells/pathology , Gold/chemistry , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Metal Nanoparticles/chemistry , Microscopy, Electron, Transmission , Particle Size , Principal Component Analysis , Surface Properties
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...