Endostatin dramatically inhibits endothelial cell migration, vascular morphogenesis, and perivascular cell recruitment in vivo.

Endostatin is a proteolytic fragment of collagen XVIII that inhibits endothelial cell migration in vitro and experimental tumor growth in vivo. To determine how endostatin affects the in vivo behavior of endothelial cells, we took advantage of a surrogate model of human angiogenesis, in which human endothelial cells are transferred to immunodeficient mice and develop into complex vessels in the course of 30 days. Systemic delivery of human yeast-derived endostatin (serum levels of 30-35 ng/mL) inhibited the number of human vessels dramatically (95% at day 20), as most endothelial cells remained suspended as single cells. The fraction of cells with a migratory phenotype (F-actin-positive, extending pseudopods) was strongly reduced (from 50% to 13% at day 10), while the number of apoptotic and mitotic cells remained unchanged. Endostatin also hampered the recruitment of alpha-smooth muscle actin-expressing perivascular cells and thus reduced the number of mature vessels (from 64.3% to 28.6% at day 30). Moreover, transcripts of pericyte-recruiting platelet-derived growth factor-B (PDGFB) were strongly reduced in endothelial cells of endostatin-treated mice. Our results are strong evidence that endostatin inhibits angiogenesis at several levels in vivo, including perivascular cell recruitment.

Inactivation of deoxycytidine kinase and overexpression of P-glycoprotein in AraC and daunorubicin double resistant leukemic cell lines.

AraC resistance in vitro is explained by inactivation of dCK, while resistance to DNR is described by overexpression of multidrug efflux pumps like Pgp or MRP. Thus far, no correlation between resistance mechanisms in vitro and in patients with AML has been documented. We generated AraC and DNR double resistant cell lines to investigate resistance mechanisms of both agents. In these cell lines involvement of dCK was extensively investigated and Pgp expression and activity was determined. Our data implicate that similar resistance mechanisms like inactivation of dCK coincided by alternatively spliced dCK forms and overexpression of Pgp are induced in single-as well as in double resistant leukemic cell lines.

Deoxycytidine kinase expression and activity in patients with resistant versus sensitive acute myeloid leukemia.

Resistance to cytarabine (AraC) is a major problem in treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In contrast to in vitro AraC resistance, deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) mutations are rarely found in patients with refractory or relapsed AML. Previously we have demonstrated alternatively spliced dCK mRNA predominantly expressed in leukemic blasts from patients with resistant AML. In this study we investigated wild-type (wt) dCK expression and activity to elucidate the possible role of decreased dCK expression or activity in unresponsiveness to AraC in patients with AML. No alterations in dCK mRNA and protein expression or in dCK activity were detected between patients with clinically resistant vs. sensitive AML. In addition, wt dCK expression and activity were not reduced in leukemic blasts expressing alternatively spliced dCK forms as compared to blasts with only wt dCK. Also, no major differences in wt dCK expression and activity were observed between samples obtained from patients with AML and bone marrow or peripheral blood samples from healthy donors. These data implicate that in our patient group of refractory or relapsed AML cases, alterations in dCK expression and/or activity cannot explain unresponsiveness to chemotherapy including AraC.

Functional role of alternatively spliced deoxycytidine kinase in sensitivity to cytarabine of acute myeloid leukemic cells.

Development of resistance to cytarabine (AraC) is a major problem in the treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Inactivation of deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) plays an important role in AraC resistance in vitro. We have identified inactive, alternatively spliced dCK forms in leukemic blasts from patients with resistant AML. Because these dCK-spliced variants were only detectable in resistant AML, it was hypothesized that they might play a role in AraC resistance in vivo. In the current study, the biologic role of the alternatively spliced dCK forms in AraC resistance was further investigated by retroviral transductions in rat leukemic cells. Introduction of inactive, alternatively spliced dCK forms into AraC-resistant K7 cells, with no endogenous wild-type (wt) dCK activity, could not restore AraC sensitivity, whereas wt dCK fully restored the AraC-sensitive phenotype. Transfection of alternatively spliced dCK forms into AraC-sensitive KA cells, as well as in human leukemic U937 cells and in phytohemagglutinin-stimulated T cells, did not significantly change sensitivity toward AraC. In addition, cotransduction of wt dCK with alternatively spliced dCK in K7 cells did not result in altered sensitivity to AraC compared with K7 cells only transduced with wt dCK. These data indicate that the alternatively spliced dCK forms cannot act as a dominant-negative inhibitor on dCK wt activity when they are coexpressed in a single cell. However, a cell expressing alternatively spliced dCK forms that has lost wt dCK expression is resistant to the cytotoxic effects of AraC.