Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 39(1): 6-13, 2011 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20650547

ABSTRACT

We performed a prospective multicenter study to assess the dryness and irritation of the hands in health care facilities, and to evaluate whether that disinfection with an alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) is better tolerated than classic handwashing with mild soap and water. Our study was conducted in 9 sites in the summer and winter. A team of investigators evaluated dryness and irritation. This study takes into account most of the individual and environmental risk factors (age, sex, use of a protective agent, constitutional factors, personal factors, external factors, institution, function, and number of consecutive working days). The results from the 1932 assessments collected show that traditional handwashing is a risk factor for dryness and irritation, whereas the use of ABHR causes no skin deterioration and might have a protective effect, particularly in intensive use. These results provide a strong argument to counter the rear-guard resistance to the use of ABHRs.


Subject(s)
Disinfectants/adverse effects , Hand Disinfection/methods , Skin Diseases/chemically induced , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
Br J Nutr ; 92(1): 105-11, 2004 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15230993

ABSTRACT

The aim of the present prospective study was to determine if malnutrition, measured using a simple validated score, is an independent risk factor for nosocomial infections (NI) in non-selected hospital in-patients. Between 29 and 31 May 2001, a survey on the prevalence of NI was conducted on all 1637 in-patients (61 (SD 25) years old) in a French university hospital as part of a national survey. Actual and usual body weights were recorded in all in-patients, and serum albumin levels were measured on all blood samples taken during the week before the study. Nutritional status was evaluated by using the nutritional risk index (NRI). Albumin values were obtained in 1084 patients, and complete weight information was obtained in 911. Therefore, NRI was calculated in 630 patients (61 (SD 20) years old): 427 (67.8 %) were malnourished. NI prevalence was 8.7 %: 4.4 % in non-malnourished patients, 7.6 % in moderately malnourished patients and 14.6 % in severely malnourished patients. In univariate analysis, the odds ratios for NI were 1.46 (95 % CI 1.2, 2.1) in moderately malnourished patients and 4.98 (95 % CI 4.6, 6.4) in severely malnourished patients. In multivariate analysis, age, immunodeficiency and NRI class influenced NI risk. Vascular and urinary catheters, and surgical intervention, were the extrinsic factors associated with NI, with odds ratios ranging from 2.0 (95 % CI 1.8, 2.6) for vascular catheters to 10.8 (95 % CI 8.8, 12.6) for association of the three factors. In conclusion, in non-selected hospitalized patients, malnutrition assessed with a simple and objective marker is an independent risk factor for NI. An early screening for malnutrition may therefore be helpful to reduce the high prevalence of NI.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/etiology , Nutrition Disorders/complications , Adult , Age Distribution , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nutritional Status , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Serum Albumin/analysis , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/etiology , Urinary Tract Infections/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...