Comparison of Spinoglenoid Versus Suprascapular Notch Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Distal Suprascapular Nerve Blocks for Shoulder Pain: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Distal suprascapular nerve blocks (SSNB) can be performed at the level of the suprascapular notch (the preferred site) or at the level of the spinoglenoid notch. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of spinoglenoid versus suprascapular notch approaches for ultrasound (US)-guided distal SSNB in patients with chronic shoulder pain. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient clinic of a tertiary center. METHODS: Eighty patients with chronic unilateral shoulder pain were included in this study. Patients were randomized into 2 groups: group 1 (SSNB at the level of the spinoglenoid notch) and group 2 (SSNB at the level of the suprascapular notch). The patients were evaluated for pain according to the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and a secondary visual analog scale (VAS), as well as for the outcome measures of range of motion (ROM) and pain pressure threshold (PPT) at baseline and at one, 4, and 12 weeks after the injection. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvement was observed in the SPADI and VAS scores and ROM measurements, and the PPT measurements were similar at all post-injection follow-ups in both groups. Changes in outcome measures were similar between the groups, except for some ROM measurements at the post-injection follow-ups. LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneity of shoulder pain etiologies. CONCLUSION: Both distal SSNB approaches significantly improved pain and disability scores in patients with chronic shoulder pain, with no observable differences in the short-to-medium term. SSNB performed at the level of the spinoglenoid notch is therefore not inferior in efficacy and safety to SSNB performed at the level of the suprascapular notch.

The relationship between muscle size, obesity, body fat ratio, pain and disability in individuals with and without nonspecific low back pain.

Patients with nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP) may face motor control problems and health disability barriers during various tasks. However, studies investigating the extent of these disadvantages, and possible associated factors are quite limited in patients with NSLBP. To compare motor control performances and physical assessment domains between patients with NSLBP and asymptomatic controls. Twenty-seven patients with NSBLP and 27 age- and sex-matched asymptomatic controls participated in this cross-sectional study. Ultrasonographic imaging was used to determine abdominal and multifidus muscles thicknesses and adipose tissue rate. Visual analog scale was used to assess LBP severity. Body mass index (BMI) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores of the participants were physical assessment domains of LBP. BMI values were greater in the NSLBP group compared to the asymptomatic participants. ANCOVA revealed a significant interaction effect regarding external abdominal oblique and multifidus lumborum muscles thickness, and abdominal adipose tissue (p = 0.015; p = 0.001; p = 0.006), respectively in terms of two groups. The thicknesses of these muscles were lesser in the NSLBP group compared with the control group. Similarly, abdominal adipose tissue was higher in the NSLBP group. The stepwise multiple regression analysis demonstrated that the Oswestry Disability Index and abdominal adipose tissue rate were significant and independent factors of the low back pain severity with 73.5% of the variance. The study results indicate that increased disability and fat infiltration are possible determinants influencing pain severity, although further research is required. Examining musculoskeletal properties of lumbar region could provide information about the limitation in patients with NSBLP.