Percutaneous Vertebroplasty and Upper Instrumented Vertebra Cement Augmentation Reducing Early Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Failure Rate in Adult Spinal Deformity: Case Series and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: One of the risks involved after long-segment fusions includes proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF). There are reported modalities to help prevent this, including 2-level prophylactic vertebroplasty. In this study, our goal was to report the largest series of prophylactic cement augmentation with upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) + 1 vertebroplasty and a literature review. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our long-segment fusions for adult spinal deformity from 2018 to 2022. The primary outcome measures included the incidence of PJK and PJF. Secondary outcomes included preoperative and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index, visual analog scale back and leg scores, surgical site infection, and plastic surgery closure assistance. In addition, we performed a literature review searching PubMed with a combination of the following words: "cement augmentation," "UIV + 1 vertebroplasty," "adjacent segment disease," and "prophylactic vertebroplasty." We found a total of 8 articles including 4 retrospective reviews, 2 prospective reviews, and 2 systematic reviews. The largest cohort of these articles included 39 patients with a PJK/PJF incidence of 28%/5%. RESULTS: Overall, we found 72 long-segment thoracolumbar fusion cases with prophylactic UIV cement augmentation with UIV + 1 vertebroplasty. The mean follow-up time was 17.25 months. Of these cases, 8 (11.1%) developed radiographic PJK and 3 (4.2%) required reoperation for PJF. Of the remaining 5 patients with radiographic PJK, 3 were clinically asymptomatic and treated conservatively and 2 had distal fractured rods that required only rod replacement. CONCLUSION: In this study, we report the largest series of patients with prophylactic percutaneous vertebroplasty and UIV cement augmentation with a low PJK and PJF incidence of 11.1% and 4.2%, respectively, compared with previously reported literature. Surgeons who regularly perform long-segment fusions for adult spinal deformity can consider this in their armamentarium when using methods to prevent adjacent segment disease because it is an effective modality in reducing early PJK and PJF that can often result in revision surgery.

Direct Aspiration versus Stent Retriever Thrombectomy for Acute Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in 9127 Patients.

BACKGROUND: The two most common approaches to thrombectomy of emergent large vessel occlusion (direct aspiration and primary stent retriever thrombectomy) have been extensively studied; however, the detailed benefit and risk comparison is largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare radiographic and clinical outcomes between the use of primary stent retrievers and direct aspiration in management of acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: PubMed database was searched for studies between September 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017 with acute ischemic stroke patients. RESULTS: We identified 64 studies with 6875 patients in the primary stent retriever group and 25 studies with 2252 patients in the aspiration group. Primary aspiration alone, without the need of rescue stent retriever devices within the aspiration cohort, was performed in 65% of 2252 patients. There was no difference in the distribution of emergent large vessel occlusion based on occlusion site, age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, or the use of intravenous tPA (P = .19, .051, .23, and .093, respectively). Successful recanalization rates, defined as thrombolysis in cerebral Infarction 2b/3, were significantly higher in the aspiration group than the primary stent retriever group (89% versus 80%, P < .0001). No significant difference in good clinical outcome, defined as modified Rankin scale 0-2 (aspiration 52% versus stent 48%, P = .13), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (aspiration 5.6% versus stent 7.2%, P = .07), and mortality at 3 months (aspiration 15% versus stent 19%, P = .10). CONCLUSIONS: Both aspiration-first (including the subsequent use of stent retriever) and primary stent retriever thrombectomy approaches are equally effective in achieving good clinical outcomes. Our study suggests that direct aspiration with or without subsequent use of stent retriever is a safe and effective alternative to primary stent retriever in acute ischemic stroke.