Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pract Lab Med ; 21: e00175, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32637525

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Distinction between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) based on clinical symptoms is often difficult. In this study we assessed the performance of the fully-automated calprotectin immunoassay from DiaSorin in IBD diagnosis and follow-up and compared it to the EliA calprotectin 2 immunoassay. DESIGN: and Methods: The calprotectin immunoassay from DiaSorin run on the LIAISONXL was analytically and clinically validated and compared to the EliA calprotectin 2 immunoassay from Thermo Fisher Scientific run on the ImmunoCAP250. Five patient groups were measured (n â€‹= â€‹303): IBD: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD); non-IBD: IBS, other gastrointestinal diseases and controls (healthy patients with no gastrointestinal disease). RESULTS: The calprotectin immunoassay of DiaSorin showed good analytical performance with frozen samples. The presence of blood in the stool can interfere with the measurement of calprotectin. Patients suffering from IBD (UC or CD) showed significant higher concentrations of fecal calprotectin compared to controls (UC:710 â€‹± â€‹921 â€‹mg/kg; CD:967 â€‹± â€‹1243 â€‹mg/kg; controls:11±8 â€‹mg/kg) using DiaSorin's immunoassay. The remaining non-IBD groups showed no significant difference compared to controls. Follow-up patients (n â€‹= â€‹9) showed a significant decrease in fecal calprotectin after treatment. At 50 â€‹mg/kg cut-off value, the negative predictive value for DiaSorin's immunoassay was 96% and the positive predictive value 83% (sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 86%). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of standardization contributes to the numerical differences between the two methods, but the qualitative conclusions do not differ. DiaSorin's calprotectin immunoassay can be used both to distinguish between IBD and non-IBD patients as well as for follow-up of IBD patients.

2.
Dev Dyn ; 240(11): 2561-77, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22012595

ABSTRACT

The inhibitor of differentiation Id2 is expressed in mesoderm of the second heart field, which contributes myocardial and mesenchymal cells to the primary heart tube. The role of Id2 in cardiac development is insufficiently known. Heart development was studied in sequential developmental stages in Id2 wildtype and knockout mouse embryos. Expression patterns of Id2, MLC-2a, Nkx2.5, HCN4, and WT-1 were analyzed. Id2 is expressed in myocardial progenitor cells at the inflow and outflow tract, in the endocardial and epicardial lineage, and in neural crest cells. Id2 knockout embryos show severe cardiac defects including abnormal orientation of systemic and pulmonary drainage, abnormal myocardialization of systemic and pulmonary veins, hypoplasia of the sinoatrial node, large interatrial communications, ventricular septal defects, double outlet right ventricle, and myocardial hypoplasia. Our results indicate a role for Id2 in the second heart field contribution at both the arterial and the venous poles of the heart.


Subject(s)
Heart Defects, Congenital/genetics , Heart/embryology , Inhibitor of Differentiation Protein 2/genetics , Animals , Animals, Newborn , Body Patterning/genetics , Computer Simulation , Embryo, Mammalian , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Gestational Age , Heart/anatomy & histology , Heart Defects, Congenital/embryology , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Inhibitor of Differentiation Protein 2/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Knockout , Models, Biological , Organogenesis/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL