ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to reevaluate and improve the quality and safety of the chemotherapy preparation in a Central Chemotherapy Preparation Unit of a Public Hospital. METHODS: A failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) was conducted by a multidisciplinary team. All potential failure modes at each stage of the chemotherapy preparation were recorded, and the associated risks were scored for their severity, occurrence, and detectability with a risk priority number (RPN). Corrective actions were suggested, and new RPNs were estimated for the modified process. RESULTS: Failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis and priority matrix construction, revealed that the partial compliance of Unit's premises with international standards (RPNstage: 307), the human errors throughout the compounding (RPNstage: 223)-labeling (RPNstage: 216)-prescribing (RPNstage: 198) steps, and the violation of working protocols by employees (RPNstage: 215), were the most important risks for which either urgent or immediate corrective actions had to be taken. Modifying the procedure through the proposed corrective actions is expected to lead to a significant (71.3%) risk containment, with a total RPNpreparation process reduction from 2102 to 604. CONCLUSIONS: Failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis and priority matrix development identified and prioritized effectively the risks associated with chemotherapy preparation allowing for the improvement of health services to cancer patients.
ABSTRACT
AIM: TPMT activity is characterized by a trimodal distribution, namely low, intermediate and high methylator. TPMT gene promoter contains a variable number of GC-rich tandem repeats (VNTRs), namely A, B and C, ranging from three to nine repeats in length in an A(n)B(m)C architecture. We have previously shown that the VNTR architecture in the TPMT gene promoter affects TPMT gene transcription. MATERIALS, METHODS & RESULTS: Here we demonstrate, using reporter assays, that 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) treatment results in a VNTR architecture-dependent decrease of TPMT gene transcription, mediated by the binding of newly recruited protein complexes to the TPMT gene promoter, upon 6-MP treatment. We also show that acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients undergoing 6-MP treatment display a VNTR architecture-dependent response to 6-MP. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the TPMT gene promoter VNTR architecture can be potentially used as a pharmacogenomic marker to predict toxicity due to 6-MP treatment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients.
