Bipolar symptoms, somatic burden and functioning in older-age bipolar disorder: A replication study from the global aging & geriatric experiments in bipolar disorder database (GAGE-BD) project.

OBJECTIVES: The Global Aging & Geriatric Experiments in Bipolar Disorder Database (GAGE-BD) project pools archival datasets on older age bipolar disorder (OABD). An initial Wave 1 (W1; n = 1369) analysis found both manic and depressive symptoms reduced among older patients. To replicate this finding, we gathered an independent Wave 2 (W2; n = 1232, mean ± standard deviation age 47.2 ± 13.5, 65% women, 49% aged over 50) dataset. DESIGN/METHODS: Using mixed models with random effects for cohort, we examined associations between BD symptoms, somatic burden and age and the contribution of these to functioning in W2 and the combined W1 + W2 sample (n = 2601). RESULTS: Compared to W1, the W2 sample was younger (p < 0.001), less educated (p < 0.001), more symptomatic (p < 0.001), lower functioning (p < 0.001) and had fewer somatic conditions (p < 0.001). In the full W2, older individuals had reduced manic symptom severity, but age was not associated with depression severity. Age was not associated with functioning in W2. More severe BD symptoms (mania p ≤ 0.001, depression p ≤ 0.001) were associated with worse functioning. Older age was significantly associated with higher somatic burden in the W2 and the W1 + W2 samples, but this burden was not associated with poorer functioning. CONCLUSIONS: In a large, independent sample, older age was associated with less severe mania and more somatic burden (consistent with previous findings), but there was no association of depression with age (different from previous findings). Similar to previous findings, worse BD symptom severity was associated with worse functioning, emphasizing the need for symptom relief in OABD to promote better functioning.

Spanish validation of the Empirically Developed Clinical Staging Model (EmDe-5) for patients with bipolar disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Bipolar disorder (BD) has been reconceptualised as a progressive disorder that develops from mild to severe presentations. An empirical staging model - the Empirically Developed Clinical Staging Model for BD (EmDe-5) - was developed in a previous study. This study aims to further validate that model using a larger and more representative Spanish sample. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 183 BD outpatients were recruited at 11 sites in Spain. Assessment included clinical characteristics of the BD (number of hospitalisations, number of suicide attempts, comorbid personality disorders), physical health (BMI, metabolic syndrome, number of physical illnesses), cognition (SCIP), functioning (permanently disabled due to BD, FAST), and quality of life (SF-36). The CGI-S, VAS-S, and psychopharmacological treatment pattern were used as external validators. RESULTS: Ten patients (51.5%) were classified as stage 1, 33 (18%) as stage 2, 93 (508%) as stage 3, 37 (202%) as stage 4, and 10 (55%) as stage 5. All profilers, other than number of suicide attempts (p=0.311) and comorbid personality disorder (p=0.061), exhibited worse scores from stage 1 to 5. As expected, VAS-S and CGI-S scores were worse in the later stages. Regarding treatment, early stages (1-2) were associated with the use of one to three drugs while late stages (4-5) were associated with four or more drugs (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: We confirm the EmDe-5 staging model's construct validity. The ease of obtaining the profilers, together with the operational criteria provided to quantify them, will facilitate the use of the EmDe-5 staging model in daily clinical practice.

Cognitive impairment and consumption of mental healthcare resources in outpatients with bipolar disorder.

Cognitive dysfunction is a major predictor of functional outcomes, and loss of occupational functioning is usually linked with a higher cost of illness. However, the association between cognitive impairment and consumption of health resources has not been studied in bipolar disorder to date. This study aims to examine this relationship. This is an observational, retrospective study of a representative sample of euthymic outpatients between 18 and 55 years, fulfilling DSM 5 criteria for bipolar disorder and recruited at a catchment area in Spain. Cognitive performance was screened with the Spanish version of the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-S), and several variables of health resources consumption during the previous year were registered. A total of 72 patients were assessed. Cognitive impairment according to the SCIP-S was significantly associated with the number of scheduled clinical appointments (p < 0.005) and hospital admissions (p < 0.04) but not with other health resources consumption variables. These results need to be interpreted with caution given that neither a control group nor a comprehensive, objective neuropsychological battery were used. However, despite these limitations, this study shows that in euthymic outpatients with bipolar disorder, those with suspected cognitive impairment had consumed a higher number of health resources over the previous year. These preliminary results may foster similar studies on the relationship between mental healthcare resource use and cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder and other psychiatric disorders.

Duration of euthymia and predominant polarity in bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: The concept of Predominant Polarity (PP) provides relevant information for clinical practice and has been widely described as course specifier for Bipolar Disorder (BD), however it has not been incorporated in DSM-5 yet. A descriptive study was conducted to identify clinical patterns associated with PP in outpatients attending a Mental Health Unit. METHODS: Clinical and socio-demographic characteristics were assessed from a sample of 118 euthymic outpatients fulfilling DSM 5 criteria for BDI or II recruited at a catchment area. According to their PP, patients were divided into three subgroups: depressive (DPP; 39.0%), manic (MPP; 32.2%) or indeterminate (IPP; 28.8%). Subgroups of PP were compared regarding a comprehensive set of demographic and clinical features. RESULTS: PP subgroups significantly differed in duration of euthymia, measured in months since the last episode (p < 0.04), with MMP patients showing longer periods (42.4 months) than those with DPP and IPP (18.6 and 18.1 months, respectively). Moreover, history of seasonal pattern was significantly higher in the DPP group compared with the PPM group (p < 0.001). There were no significant correlations between PP and type of last episode, length of illness, number of previous admissions, history of psychotic symptoms, or number of suicide attempts. LIMITATIONS: Cross sectional design, relatively modest sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed similar results to previous literature regarding distribution of predominant polarity. The association found between PP and duration of euthymia represents a novel finding which awaits confirmation and adds further support to the usefulness of PP in clinical practice.

Experiencia de colaboración entre atención primaria y salud mental en el Departamento de Salud La Ribera, 7 años después / An experience of collaboration between primary health care and mental health care in La Ribera Department of Health (Valencia, Spain)

Pese a la gran frecuencia de problemas de salud mental entre los consultantes de atención primaria, persiste el problema de unos inadecuados diagnóstico y tratamiento. Se necesita una buena capacitación de los médicos de familia para el manejo de estos trastornos, a fin de minimizar su impacto sanitario, económico y social. Entre otros elementos, se considera relevante la cooperación con los servicios de salud mental, para la cual existen diferentes modelos. Nuestro departamento de salud inició en 2006 una colaboración estable según el modelo de enlace. Se han obtenido resultados positivos en términos de reducción de demora para las primeras visitas al especialista y de aumento de la satisfacción de los profesionales, aunque deben interpretarse con cautela. Recientemente se han acumulado evidencias sobre la utilidad del modelo colaborativo, aunque su evaluación y extrapolación son complejas. Nos proponemos ahondar en la evaluación de nuestro modelo, de manera análoga a otras iniciativas de nuestro entorno (AU)

Despite the high prevalence of mental health problems among patients attending primary care, diagnosis and treatment of these disorders remain inadequate. Sound training of primary care physicians in how to manage mental health problems is needed to reduce the health, economic and social impact associated with these disorders. Among other elements, there is a need for cooperation between primary care physicians and mental health services. Distinct models are available for such collaboration. In 2006, our health department started a collaboration between these two levels of heath care, using a liaison model. Delays until the first specialist visit were reduced and satisfaction among health professionals increased, although these results should be interpreted with caution. Evidence has recently accumulated on the usefulness of the collaborative model, but evaluation of this model and extrapolation of its results are complex. We intend to evaluate our model more thoroughly, similar to other projects in our environment (AU)

[An experience of collaboration between primary health care and mental health care in La Ribera Department of Health (Valencia, Spain)]. / Experiencia de colaboración entre atención primaria y salud mental en el Departamento de Salud La Ribera, 7 años después.

Despite the high prevalence of mental health problems among patients attending primary care, diagnosis and treatment of these disorders remain inadequate. Sound training of primary care physicians in how to manage mental health problems is needed to reduce the health, economic and social impact associated with these disorders. Among other elements, there is a need for cooperation between primary care physicians and mental health services. Distinct models are available for such collaboration. In 2006, our health department started a collaboration between these two levels of heath care, using a liaison model. Delays until the first specialist visit were reduced and satisfaction among health professionals increased, although these results should be interpreted with caution. Evidence has recently accumulated on the usefulness of the collaborative model, but evaluation of this model and extrapolation of its results are complex. We intend to evaluate our model more thoroughly, similar to other projects in our environment.