SponTaneous Respiration using IntraVEnous anaesthesia and Hi-flow nasal oxygen (STRIVE Hi) maintains oxygenation and airway patency during management of the obstructed airway: an observational study.

Background: High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) has been shown to benefit oxygenation, ventilation and upper airway patency in a range of clinical scenarios, however its use in spontaneously breathing patients during general anaesthesia has not been described. Spontaneous respiration using i.v. anaesthesia is the primary technique used at our institution for tubeless airway surgery. We hypothesized that the addition of HFNO would increase our margin of safety, particularly during management of an obstructed airway. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using a SponTaneous Respiration using IntraVEnous anaesthesia and High-flow nasal oxygen (STRIVE Hi) technique to manage 30 adult patients undergoing elective laryngotracheal surgery. Results: Twenty-six patients (87%) presented with significant airway and/or respiratory compromise (16 were stridulous, 10 were dyspnoeic). No episodes of apnoea or complete airway obstruction occurred during the induction of anaesthesia using STRIVE Hi. The median [IQR (range)] lowest oxygen saturation during the induction period was 100 [99­100 (97­100)] %. The median [IQR (range)] overall duration of spontaneous ventilation was 44 [40­49.5 (18­100)] min. The median [IQR (range)] end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) level at the end of the spontaneous ventilation period was 6.8 [6.4­7.1 (4.8­8.9)] kPa. The mean rate of increase in ETCO2 was 0.03 kPa min−1. Conclusions: STRIVE Hi succeeded in preserving adequate oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide and airway patency. We suggest that the upper and lower airway benefits attributed to HFNO, are ideally suited to a spontaneous respiration induction, increasing its margin of safety. STRIVE Hi is a modern alternative to the traditional inhalation induction.

Spontaneous ventilation using Propofol TCI for microlaryngoscopy in adults: a retrospective audit.

We conducted a retrospective audit of 285 adult elective microlaryngoscopy cases in our institution over a three-and-a-half year period. Conventional anaesthesia with intubation and mechanical ventilation was the most common technique, used in 71% of cases. Tubeless spontaneous ventilation during total intravenous anaesthesia with a target-controlled infusion of propofol (SVTCI) was the most common alternative. Spontaneous ventilation with target-controlled infusion was used for 79 (27.7%) anaesthetic inductions and was continued through the maintenance phase for 60 patients (21.1%). Jet and intermittent ventilation were both used infrequently (1% each). The most common SVTCI technique since 2013 involved adjusting the target-controlled infusion rate during induction using a formula we developed based on intermittently increasing the target rate, such that the predicted plasma concentration minus the predicted effect site concentration was maintained at 1 µg/ml. We found that this method maintained ventilation during induction more reliably than other SVTCI strategies, and was associated with fewer complications than other spontaneous ventilation techniques or mechanical ventilation: it was associated with only one (3.1%) failed induction and one (3.9%) episode of apnoea. Jet ventilation was associated with the most severe complications, including two cases of barotrauma.

A prospective comparison between written examination and either simulation-based or oral viva examination of intensive care trainees' procedural skills.

We compared results of written assessment of intensive care trainees' procedural skills with results obtained from one of two live assessment formats for the purposes of assessing the concurrent validity of the different test methods. Forty-five Australasian senior trainees in intensive care medicine completed a written test relating to a procedural skill, as well as either a simulation format or oral viva assessment on the same procedural skill. We analysed correlation between written exam results and results obtained from simulation format or oral viva assessment. For those who completed the simulation format examination, we also maintained a narrative of actions and identified critical errors. There was limited correlation between written exam results and live (simulation or viva) procedure station results (r = 0.31). Correlation with written exam results was very low for simulation format assessments (r = 0.08) but moderate for oral viva format assessment (r = 0.58). Participants who passed a written exam based on management of a blocked tracheostomy scenario performed a number of dangerous errors when managing a simulated patient in that scenario. The lack of correlation between exam formats supports multi-modal assessment, as currently it is not known which format best represents workplace performance. Correlation between written and oral viva results may indicate redundancy between those test formats, whereas limited correlation between simulation and written exams may support the use of both formats as part of an integrated assessment strategy. We hypothesise that identification of critical candidate errors in a simulation format exam that were not exposed in a written exam may indicate better predictive validity for simulation format examination of procedural skills.

Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: is this an overlooked cause of desaturation in the immediate postoperative period?

We report the case of a 38-yr-old man who presented for an emergency mastoidectomy and suffered from severe upper airways obstruction in the postoperative period. Subsequent questioning revealed a history of heroic snoring and further investigations proved a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea.