Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Rev. latinoam. enferm ; 10(5): 667-674, set.-out. 2002. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: lil-353365

ABSTRACT

Estudo descritivo e exploratório, realizado mediante entrevista com 221 puérperas que tiveram parto em maternidades públicas estaduais, localizadas no município de São Paulo. Teve como objetivos: 1. identificar o tipo de parto esperado pelas mulheres, considerando a via vaginal ou cesariana, e sua justificativa; 2. verificar a ocorrência do tipo de parto, segundo as expectativas dessas mulheres; 3. comparar a indicacão médica da cesariana com o entendimento das mulheres sobre justificativa dessa intervencão. Os dados revelam que 74,7 por cento tinham expectativa de que o parto fosse normal, e 25,3 por cento, de que fosse cesárea. O parto normal, esperado por 165 entrevistadas, ocorreu em 66,1 por cento dessas mulheres. A justificativa mais citada pelas mulheres para esperar o parto normal foi a recuperacão pós-parto mais rápida e, para a cesárea, ter tido cesárea anterior. As justificativas apresentadas por 61 mulheres para a realizacão da cesariana não era coincidente com a indicacão médica em 47,5 por cento dos casos


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Adult , Natural Childbirth , Delivery, Obstetric , Women's Health , Parturition
2.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem ; 10(5): 667-74, 2002.
Article in Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12641053

ABSTRACT

This descriptive and exploratory study was carried out through interviews with 221 puerperal women who gave birth in Sao Paulo State public maternities located within the capital. The purposes of the work were: 1. to identify the type of childbirth women expected to have--whether vaginal births or cesareans--and why; 2. to verify to what extent women's expectations corresponded to the type of birth they had; 3. to compare medical indications for c-sections with women's understanding of justifications they were given for this intervention. Data revealed that 74.7% of the women expected to have vaginal births and 25.3% expected to have cesarean sections. Vaginal birth, expected by 165 interviewees, occurred in 66.1% of these cases. Among women who expected having vaginal births, the most mentioned justification was that recuperation afterwards was faster. Among women who expected cesareans, the most mentioned justification was a previous c-section. The justifications presented by 61 women for having been submitted to c-sections did not coincide with medical indications for this intervention in 47.5% of the cases.


Subject(s)
Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Female , Humans , Pregnancy/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...