Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Gynecol Oncol Rep ; 33: 100614, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32775591

ABSTRACT

In a biopsy specimen, adenocarcinomas of the endometrium and uterine cervix may demonstrate significant morphologic overlap. The distinction between these two entities prior to surgical resection is clinically significant as assigning the primary site dictates treatment and prognosis. This diagnostic dilemma is approached by the application of a panel of immunohistochemical stains, traditionally composed of CEA, vimentin, p16, ER, and PR. Most cases are successfully managed with this panel; however, in difficult cases additional tools are needed to suggest a more definitive diagnosis. In this study, we reviewed the efficacy of the customary panel of stains, as well as the added value of new stains in the diagnosis of endocervical adenocarcinoma. Our cohort included biopsy samples of 90 patients (81 endometrial and 9 endocervical adenocarcinomas) with a subsequent hysterectomy for confirmation of diagnosis. This study validated the customary panel of stains and suggests additional markers to aid in the differential diagnosis (PAX8 and CAIX). The addition of PAX8 to the traditional panel increases PPV from 85.71% to 100%. A PPV of 100% may also be attained with fewer stains (five total), with the application of a proposed new panel, which includes PAX8, CAIX, CEA, p16 and ER. This is the first-time differential expression of CAIX has been suggested in the distinction between endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas.

2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 135(1): 81-4, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25093288

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Patients with Lynch Syndrome are at an increased risk for a variety of malignancies, including ovarian cancer. Ovarian cancers associated with Lynch Syndrome are predominantly clear cell or endometrioid in histology. Lynch Syndrome is characterized by germline mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. The current study aims to assess the prevalence of loss of MMR expression in patients with endometrioid and clear cell ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 90 patients with endometrioid and/or clear cell carcinomas. Slides made from tumor tissue microarray blocks were evaluated using immunohistochemical stains with antibodies against MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Seven of the 90 cases (7.8%) had loss of MMR expression. The mean age of patients with loss of MMR expression (47 years) was significantly younger than those with retained MMR expression (p=0.014). Loss of MMR expression was present in 20% of patients under the age of 53 with clear cell or endometrioid cancers. Genetic studies found that 3 of the 5 patients with loss of MMR expression carried mutations consistent with Lynch Syndrome; acquired hypermethylation of MLH1 was noted in one patient. Six of 7 patients (86%) whose tumors lacked MMR expression had synchronous or metachronous primary malignancies, a significantly greater prevalence than those with retained MMR expression (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients under the age of 53 with clear cell or endometrioid ovarian carcinomas are at a clinically significant risk for loss of MMR expression and Lynch Syndrome; routine screening with immunohistochemical staining should be considered.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Endometrioid/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , DNA Mismatch Repair , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/genetics , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
3.
Hawaii Med J ; 66(7): 185-7, 2007 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17879856

ABSTRACT

AIM: Assess the treatment and diagnosis rates for osteoporosis following a fragility fracture. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review. FINDINGS: Out of 93 patients with fragility fractures, 26.9% received an osteoporosis or osteopenia diagnosis within 6 months after the time of fracture. CONCLUSION: Despite availability of clinical tools and therapeutic options of the treatment of low bone density, osteoporosis remains underdiagnosed and under-treated.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Fractures, Bone/prevention & control , Medical Audit , Osteoporosis/diagnosis , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Absorptiometry, Photon , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Density , Calcium, Dietary/therapeutic use , Female , Fractures, Bone/etiology , Hawaii , Humans , Male , Osteoporosis/complications , Vitamin D/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...