Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
Bull Narc ; 37(4): 37-49, 1985.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3879667

ABSTRACT

In 1984 cannabis derivatives, in particular marijuana, hashish and liquid hashish, continued to be the most readily available drugs of abuse in Canada. Marijuana originating in Colombia decreased on the illicit marijuana market in Canada from an estimated 45 per cent in 1983 to 30 per cent in 1984, but it remained the largest source of marijuana supply. Marijuana originating in Thailand remained at approximately the same level (20 per cent) in 1984 as in 1983, while marijuana of Jamaican origin increased its share in the illicit market from 10 per cent in 1983 to 20 per cent in 1984. Approximately 10 per cent of marijuana on the illicit market originated in Canada, 10 per cent in Mexico, and 10 per cent in the United States of America. In 1984 an estimated 85 per cent of hashish on the illicit market in Canada originated in Lebanon (55 per cent in 1983), 10 per cent in India or Pakistan (31 per cent in 1983) and 5 per cent in Jamaica (2 per cent in 1983). Illicit shipments in tonnes of hashish originating in Lebanon made this the dominant source of supply of the drug. Liquid hashish originating in Jamaica shared 88 per cent of the illicit market of this drug in Canada during 1984, while 10 per cent of the drug originated in Lebanon and 2 per cent in Canada. In 1984 an estimated 40 per cent of smuggled marijuana entered the illicit market in Canada by air and approximately the same amount by sea, while 20 per cent was smuggled over land. During the same year, hashish was smuggled into Canada primarily by sea, while air accounted for 5 per cent and land for 1 per cent only. Liquid hashish, in contrast, entered Canada primarily by air, and only 9 per cent by land and 1 per cent by sea.


Subject(s)
Marijuana Abuse , Canada , Cannabis , Colombia , Costs and Cost Analysis , Humans , Illicit Drugs , India , Jamaica , Lebanon , Mexico , Pakistan , Thailand , United States
2.
Bull Narcot;37(4): 37-49, Oct.-Dec. 1985.
in English | MedCarib | ID: med-10971

ABSTRACT

In 1984 cannabis derivatives, in particular marijuana, hashish and liquid hashish, continued to be the most readily available drugs of abuse in Canada. Marijuana originating in Colombia decreased on the illicit marijuana market in Canada from an estimated 45 percent in 1983 to 30 percent in 1984, but it remained the largest source of marijuana supply. Marijuana originating in Thialand remained at approximately the same level (20 percent) in 1984 as in 1983, while marijuana of Jamaican origin increased its share in the illicit market from 10 percent in 1983 to 20 percent in 1984. Approximately 10 percent of marijuana on the illicit market originated in Canada, 10 percent in Mexico, and 10 per cent in the United States of America. In 1984 an estimated 85 percent of hashish on the illicit market in Canada originated in Lebanon (55 percent in 1983), 10 percent in India or Pakistan (31 percent in 1983) and 5 percent in Jamaica (2 percent in 1983). Illicit shipments in tonnes of hashish originating in Lebanon made this the dominant source of supply of the drug. Liquid hashish originating in Jamaica shared 88 percent of the illicit market of this drug in Canada during 1984, while 10 percent of the drug originated in Lebanon and 2 percent in Canada. In 1984 an estimated 40 percent of smuggled marijuana entered the illicit market in Canada by air and approximately the same by sea, while 20 percent was smuggled over land. During the same year, hashish was smuggled into Canada primarily by sea, while air accounted for 5 percent and land for 1 per cent only. Liquid hashish, in contrast, entered Canada primarily by air, and only 9 percent by land and 1 percent by sea (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Marijuana Abuse , Canada , Cannabis , Colombia , Costs and Cost Analysis , India , Jamaica , Lebanon , Mexico , Pakistan , Illicit Drugs , Thailand , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL