Impact of platelet transfusion on outcomes in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Trauma-induced coagulopathy includes thrombocytopenia and platelet dysfunction that impact patient outcome. Nevertheless, the role of platelet transfusion remains poorly defined. The aim of the study was 1/ to evaluate the impact of early platelet transfusion on 24-h all-cause mortality and 2/ to describe platelet count at admission (PCA) and its relationship with trauma severity and outcome. METHODS: Observational study carried out on a multicentre prospective trauma registry. All adult trauma patients directly admitted in participating trauma centres between May 2011 and June 2019 were included. Severe haemorrhage was defined as ≥ 4 red blood cell units within 6 h and/or death from exsanguination. The impact of PCA and early platelet transfusion (i.e. within the first 6 h) on 24-h all-cause mortality was assessed using uni- and multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 19,596 included patients, PCA (229 G/L [189,271]) was associated with coagulopathy, traumatic burden, shock and bleeding severity. In a logistic regression model, 24-h all-cause mortality increased by 37% for every 50 G/L decrease in platelet count (OR 0.63 95% CI 0.57-0.70; p < 0.001). Regarding patients with severe hemorrhage, platelets were transfused early for 36% of patients. Early platelet transfusion was associated with a decrease in 24-h all-cause mortality (versus no or late platelets): OR 0.52 (95% CI 0.34-0.79; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PCA, although mainly in normal range, was associated with trauma severity and coagulopathy and was predictive of bleeding intensity and outcome. Early platelet transfusion within 6 h was associated with a decrease in mortality in patients with severe hemorrhage. Future studies are needed to determine which doses of platelet transfusion will improve outcomes after major trauma.

French recommendations for the management of patients with spinal cord injury or at risk of spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVES: To update the French guidelines on the management of trauma patients with spinal cord injury or suspected spinal cord injury. DESIGN: A consensus committee of 27 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the outset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e. pharmaceutical, medical devices). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised. METHODS: The committee studied twelve questions: (1) What are the indications and arrangements for spinal immobilisation? (2) What are the arrangements for pre-hospital orotracheal intubation? (3) What are the objectives of haemodynamic resuscitation during the lesion assessment, and during the first few days in hospital? (4) What is the best way to manage these patients to improve their long-term prognosis? (5) What is the place of corticosteroid therapy in the initial phase? (6) What are the indications for magnetic resonance imaging in the lesion assessment phase? (7) What is the optimal time for surgical management? (8) What are the best arrangements for orotracheal intubation in the hospital environment? (9) What are the specific conditions for weaning these patients from mechanical ventilation for? (10) What are the procedures for analgesic treatment of these patients? (11) What are the specific arrangements for installing and mobilising these patients? (12) What is the place of early intermittent bladder sampling in these patients? Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® Methodology. RESULTS: The experts' work synthesis and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 19 recommendations. Among the recommendations formalised, 2 have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 12 have a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-). For 5 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in expert advice. After two rounds of scoring and one amendment, strong agreement was reached on all the recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant agreement among experts on strong recommendations to improve practices for the management of patients with spinal cord injury.

Outcomes of Acute Stroke Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation: Study Protocol for the SPICE Multicenter Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Care pathways and long-term outcomes of acute stroke patients requiring mechanical ventilation have not been thoroughly studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Stroke Prognosis in Intensive Care (SPICE) is a prospective multicenter cohort study which will be conducted in 34 intensive care units (ICUs) in the Paris, France area. Patients will be eligible if they meet all of the following inclusion criteria: (1) age of 18 years or older; (2) acute stroke (i.e., ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage) diagnosed on neuroimaging; (3) ICU admission within 7 days before or after stroke onset; and (4) need for mechanical ventilation for a duration of at least 24 h. Patients will be excluded if they meet any of the following: (1) stroke of traumatic origin; (2) refusal to participate; and (3) privation of liberty by administrative or judicial decision. The primary endpoint is poor functional outcome at 1 year, defined by a score of 4 to 6 on the modified Rankin scale (mRS), indicating severe disability or death. Main secondary endpoints will include decisions to withhold or withdraw care, mRS scores at 3 and 6 months, and health-related quality of life at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The SPICE multicenter study will investigate 1-year outcomes, ethical issues, as well as care pathways of acute stroke patients requiring invasive ventilation in the ICU. Gathered data will delineate human resources and facilities needs for adequate management. The identification of prognostic factors at the acute phase will help to identify patients who may benefit from prolonged intensive care and rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03335995.

[Perioperative conflicts between anaesthesiologists and surgeons: ethics and professionalism]. / Conflits en période périopératoire: un enjeu collectif, éthique et professionnel.

In the perioperative period, several potential conflicts between anaesthetists/intensive care specialists and surgeons may exist. They are detrimental to the quality of patient care and to the well-being of the teams. They are a source of medical errors and contribute to burn-out. Patients can become the victims of such conflicts, which deserve ethical reflection. Their resolution through analysis and shared solutions is necessary. This article seeks to analyse these conflicts, taking into account their specificities and constraints. In order to understand this context, it is important to consider the specificities of each group involved and the records of such situations. Several factors can prevent these conflicts, first and foremost the patients themselves and the quality of the care that is provided. Medical deontology aims mainly at preventing and resolving these conflicts. Generally speaking, the quality approach which is increasingly applied in health care institutions (involving declarations of adverse events, morbidity/mortality reviews, benchmarking, analysis and improvement of practices, etc.) also contributes to the prevention and resolution of disagreements. The teaching of communication techniques that begins with the initial training, the evaluation of team behaviours (through simulation training for example), the respect of others' constraints, particularly when it comes to learning, as well as transparency regarding conflicts of interests, are all additional elements of conflict prevention. Lastly, conflicts may at times be caused by deviant behaviours, which must be met with a clear and uncompromising collective and institutional approach. This article concludes by offering a standardised approach for conflict resolution.

Treatments and outcome, the point in head trauma.

When a severe traumatic brain-injured patient arrives to hospital, fear of failure and definite opinions about the outcome modify early care and provoke self-fulfilling prophecies. It is obvious that working on prognosis is not only useful to inform relatives but also permits to maintain a high level of care, key for a better outcome. Mortality is high (40-50%) if deaths in the first days are not excluded. Following guidelines in all cases will permit to decrease the number of preventable death and a decrease in morbidity. Well-defined networks of care leading to specialized centres with multimodal monitoring give best results. However, only 20% of living patients return to their previous life with mild handicap. These unsatisfactory results require intensifying research, notably in early rehabilitation in intensive care unit. Ethic issues should be discussed after few days of care and dialogue with relatives in a defined "window of opportunity". Ideally, we need to find strong and early indicators of outcome to limit fears on presumed handicap. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence called diffusion tensor imaging (TDI) permits to visualise traumatic axonal injury. Studies with complex statistical methodology give a good estimated probability of bad outcome but must be confirmed by more validation studies. Progress will come from a better understanding of physiopathology. Focuses on processing chain, rapid multi-monitoring, biomarkers, and investigations in MRI and TDI will help to establish opportunities for treatments and to determine limits.

Update on prehospital emergency care of severe trauma patients.

The prognosis of severe trauma patients is determined by the ability of a healthcare system to provide high intensity therapeutic treatment on the field and to transport patients as quickly as possible to the structure best suited to their condition. Direct admission to a specialized center ("trauma center") reduces the mortality of the most severe trauma at 30 days and one year. Triage in a non-specialized hospital is a major risk of loss of chance and should be avoided whenever possible. Medical dispatching plays a major role in determining patient care. The establishment of a hospital care network is an important issue that is not formalized enough in France. The initial triage of severe trauma patients must be improved to avoid taking patients to hospitals that are not equipped to take care of them. For this purpose, the MGAP score can predict severity and help decide where to transport the patient. However, it does not help predict the need for urgent resuscitation procedures. Hemodynamic management is central to the care of hemorrhagic shock and severe head trauma. Transport helicopter with a physician on board has an important role to allow direct admission to a specialized center in geographical areas that are difficult to access.

The initial management of trauma patients is an especially relevant setting to evaluate professional practice patterns.

The initial management of trauma patients in a dedicated location is a crucial step in the treatment of these patients. The characteristics of this phase are such that they meet all the criteria for a professional practice patterns evaluation (PPPE or PPE): formalized protocols, clear-cut timeframes, specific roles of different stakeholders, and multidisciplinary medical and paramedical team. In addition, the expected result of the PPE approach, improved care, will have a direct impact on patient outcomes. This PPE modeled on an audit aims at evaluating the care process based on representative criteria. These criteria should include: the planned structure and organization; the protocols; the strategy and time frames for procedure implementation; the relationships between stakeholders; the results. For each criterion, differences between the expected characteristics and the observed reality are analyzed. The prospective (independent observer or video) and/or retrospective (records, register) collection of data during 20 consecutive encounters should be sufficient to identify dysfunctions and provide guidance on the changes that need to be implemented. The proposed data collection form includes 15 items representative of the five defined criteria. These items often describe departmental choice. The pursuit of quality is defined first in terms of medical and paramedical results, but also in administrative and financial terms. Following the analysis produced by a representative group of actors, a multidisciplinary discussion of the results should be followed by proposals for simple changes approved by everyone. After a few months of implementation, the impact of the proposed improvement measures will be assessed by a new survey. This approach, in addition to improving the quality of care, allows better team stress management and greater work enjoyment.

The initial management of severe trauma patients at hospital admission.

The initial management of trauma patient is a critical period aiming at: stabilizing the vital functions; following a rigorous injury assessment; defining a therapeutic strategy. This management has to be organized to minimize loss of time that would be deleterious for the patients outcome. Thus, before patient arrival, the trauma team alert should lead to the initiation of care procedures adapted to the announced severity of the patient. Moreover, each individual should know its role in advance and the team should be managed by only one individual (the trauma leader) to avoid conflicts of decision. A rapid trauma injury assessment aims not only at guiding resuscitation (chest drainage, pelvic contention, to define the mean arterial pressure goal) but also to decide a critical intervention in case of hemodynamic instability (laparotomy, thoracotomy, arterial embolisation). This initial assessment includes a chest and a pelvic X-ray, abdominal ultrasound (extended to the lung) and transcranial Doppler (TCD). The whole body scanner with administration of intravenous contrast material is the cornerstone of the injury assessment but can be done for patients stabilized after the initial resuscitation.

Predictive factors for 1-year outcome of a cohort of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI): results from the PariS-TBI study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess outcome and predicting factors 1 year after a severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Multi-centre prospective inception cohort study of patients aged 15 or older with a severe TBI in the Parisian area, France. Data were collected prospectively starting the day of injury. One-year evaluation included the relatives-rating of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX-R), the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) and employment. Univariate and multivariate tests were computed. RESULTS: Among 257 survivors, 134 were included (mean age 36 years, 84% men). Good recovery concerned 19%, moderate disability 43% and severe disability 38%. Among patients employed pre-injury, 42% were working, 28% with no job change. DEX-R score was significantly associated with length of education only. Among initial severity measures, only the IMPACT prognostic score was significantly related to GOSE in univariate analyses, while measures relating to early evolution were more significant predictors. In multivariate analyses, independent predictors of GOSE were length of stay in intensive care (LOS), age and education. Independent predictors of employment were LOS and age. CONCLUSIONS: Age, education and injury severity are independent predictors of global disability and return to work 1 year after a severe TBI.

[Reversal for heparins and new anticoagulant treatments]. / Antagonisation des héparines et des nouveaux anticoagulants.

Even with unfractionated heparin or derivates, the reversal of pharmacologic anticoagulation is crucial in anticoagulated patients developing a life-threatening bleeding or scheduled for an emergency procedure. The antagonisation of unfractionated heparin is well codified: each milligram of protamine sulfate antagonizes 100 IU of heparin. Measurement of thrombin time reflects the anti-IIa effect of heparin and has to be monitored immediately and 1hour after the injection of protamine. The required dose of protamine sulfate depends on dosage and time of LMWH administration, although no clinical study supports these data. To date, there is no effective antidote for new anticoagulants (fondaparinux and other pentasaccharides, direct thrombin inhibitors, direct anti-Xa inhibitors). Some preliminary studies suggest the effectiveness of recombinant activated factor VII for pentasaccharides and activated or not Prothrombin Complex Concentrates and recombinant activated factor VII for oral anti-Xa and anti-IIa agents. Therefore, while the characteristics of these new anticoagulants could increase the comfort and improve the compliance, their development needs to ascertain the lack of increase in bleeding complications and the need for a safe and effective antidote.

[Brain tissue oxygen pressure, for what, for whom?]. / Pression tissulaire cérébrale en oxygène : pour quoi faire et pour qui ?

The main purpose of neurointensive care is to fight against cerebral ischaemia. Ischaemia is the cell energy failure following inadequacy between supply of glucose and oxygen and demand. Ischemia monitoring starts with a global approach, especially with cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) determined by mean arterial pressure and intracranial pressure (ICP). However, global monitoring is insufficient to detect "regional" ischaemia, leading to development of local monitoring such as brain oxygen partial pressure (PtiO(2)). PtiO(2) is measured on a volume of a few mm(3) from a probe implanted in the cerebral tissue. The normal value is classically included between 25 and 35 mmHg and critical ischemic threshold is 10 mmHg. Understanding what exactly is PtiO(2) is still a matter of debate. PtiO(2) is more an indicator of oxygen diffusion depending of oxygen arterial pressure (PaO(2)) and local cerebral blood flow (CBF). Increase PaO(2) to treat PtiO(2) would hide information about local CBF. PtiO(2) is useful for the detection of low local CBF even when ICP is low as in hypocapnia-induced vasoconstriction. PtiO(2)-guided management could lead to a continuous optimization of arterial oxygen transport for an optimal cerebral tissue oxygenation. Finally, PtiO(2) has probably a global prognostic value because studies showed that hypoxic values for a long period of time lead to an unfavourable neurologic outcome. In conclusion, PtiO(2) provides additional information for regional monitoring of cerebral ischaemia and deserves more intensive use to better understand it and probably improve neurointensive care management.

Pre-hospital transcranial Doppler in severe traumatic brain injury: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Investigation of the feasibility and usefulness of pre-hospital transcranial Doppler (TCD) to guide early goal-directed therapy following severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Prospective, observational study of 18 severe TBI patients during pre-hospital medical care. TCD was performed to estimate cerebral perfusion in the field and upon arrival at the Level 1 trauma centre. Specific therapy (mannitol, noradrenaline) aimed at improving cerebral perfusion was initiated if the initial TCD was abnormal (defined by a pulsatility index >1.4 and low diastolic velocity). RESULTS: Nine patients had a normal initial TCD and nine an abnormal one, without a significant difference between groups in terms of the Glasgow Coma Scale or the mean arterial pressure. Among patients with an abnormal TCD, four presented with an initial areactive bilateral mydriasis. Therapy normalized TCD in five patients, with reversal of the initial mydriasis in two cases. Among these five patients for whom TCD was corrected, only two died within the first 48 h. All four patients for whom the TCD could not be corrected during transport died within 48 h. Only patients with an initial abnormal TCD required emergent neurosurgery (3/9). Mortality at 48 h was significantly higher for patients with an initial abnormal TCD. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary study suggests that TCD could be used in pre-hospital care to detect patients whose cerebral perfusion may be impaired.

[Coagulation disorders after traumatic brain injury: pathophysiology and therapeutic implications]. / Troubles de la coagulation lors du traumatisme cranio-encéphalique: physiopathologie et conséquences thérapeutiques.

Early activation of coagulation is common after traumatic brain injury. Its origin is probably mainly intracerebral, due to tissue factor release from the injured brain. Abnormalities in blood coagulation tests are associated with poor neurological prognosis. Coagulation activation may induce disseminated intravascular coagulation and fibrinolysis. Disseminated intravascular coagulation is linked to brain ischemia caused by intravascular microthrombosis. This review will focus on pathophysiology of coagulation disorders after traumatic brain injury, and on their implications for therapeutic approaches.

[Hypernatremia in neurointensive care]. / L'hypernatrémie contrôlée est-elle utile en neuroréanimation?

Hypernatremia invariably denotes hyperosmolarity and, at least transiently, causes cellular dehydration. Because of blood brain barrier properties, cerebral tissue volume is modified by acute changes in osmolarity. An acute hyperosmolarity (by intravenous sodium or mannitol) temporally decreases intracranial pressure. This treatment is thus useful in critical situations, allowing time for diagnosis and, if possible, other treatment. But in cases of sustained hypernatremia, cellular dehydration is rapidly counterbalanced by an increase in cellular osmolarity. For the brain, it has been shown that cerebral volume is restored in a few hours during prolonged hypernatremia. Moreover, the plasmatic osmotic load induces an increase in diuresis and natriuresis. A tight control is then necessary to prevent hypovolemia and electrolytes disorders. Teams using this treatment should undertake controlled randomized studies to ascertain any beneficial effect that cannot be explained by physiology.

[Hypothermia and cerebral protection after head trauma. Influence of blood gases modifications]. / Hypothermie et protection cérébrale après traumatisme crânien. Influence des gaz du sang.

The usefulness of therapeutic hypothermia is highly debated after traumatic brain injury. A neuroprotective effect has been demonstrated only in experimental studies: decrease in cerebral metabolism, restoration of ATP level, better control of cerebral edema and cellular effects. Despite negative multicenter clinical studies, therapeutic hypothermia is still used to a better control of intracranial pressure. However, important issues need to be clarified, particularly the level and duration of hypothermia, the depth and modalities of sedation. A clear understanding of blood gases variations induced by hypothermia is needed to understand the cerebral perfusion and oxygenation changes. It is essential to recognize and to use hypothermia-induced physiological hypocapnia and alkalosis under strict control of cerebral oxygen balance (jugular venous saturation or tissue PO(2)) and also to take into account the increased affinity of hemoglobin for oxygen. Management of post-traumatic intracranial hypertension using hypothermia, directed by intracranial pressure level, and consequently for long duration, is potentially beneficial but needs further clarification.

[Cellular metabolism, temperature and brain injury]. / Métabolisme cellulaire, température et agression cérébrale.

Brain temperature is strongly linked to brain metabolic rate. In the brain, energy metabolism is mainly oxidative. The oxidative metabolism and heat production are therefore strongly related. In normal conditions, heat production consecutive to brain energy metabolism is counterbalanced by heat loss, by using a complex heat exchange system. After major cerebral injuries as subarachnoid haemorrhage or traumatic brain injury, cerebral temperature can often exceed systemic temperature. Moreover, brain temperature can vary independently to systemic temperature, making difficult the prediction of brain temperature from other central temperatures. Mitochondrial dysfunction is probably the corner stone of these post-injury perturbations of brain temperature. Understanding of this phenomenon remains however not complete.