Quantitative electroencephalography for tinnitus--a means for data collection, analysis, and translation.

Quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) is the technique whereby brain electrical activity in individuals is recorded as they sit quietly with their eyes closed. The electrical activity is quantified with a variety of statistical measures to characterize the huge variation in combinations of emissions from the brain. Neuroscience research has demonstrated that such resting brain activity measures may be consistently altered in conditions such as depression or dementia. A wide variety of ongoing efforts are attempting to find characterizations that reliably denote other neurological conditions. In research on tinnitus, a variety of groups have been working to characterize QEEG changes related to the presence of the abnormal sensation of sound and to the emotional distress associated with it. QEEG changes related to the tinnitus percept are in the gamma electroencephalography (EEG) band recorded from temporal lobes. Clinical depression has a reliable marker in the depression of posterior cerebral alpha EEG frequency band activity, and this same activity is found in patients with tinnitus of the severe disabling type. In the past, QEEG has suffered from inconsistent recording methods, closed data sets, and noncompatible analytical techniques. Now in the modern era, when reliable data sets are shared and hardware and software are less expensive, regular use of QEEG will be clinically important. Those prepared to make the minor investment in equipment and training will reap the benefit of objective measures of brain activity. Knowing patterns of QEEG activity related to tinnitus and its associated depression will help clinicians better manage these patients.

A randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavior therapy for tinnitus.

This study is a randomized, waitlist-controlled trial testing the effect of a brief, "manualized" cognitive-behavioral group therapy on distress associated with tinnitus, quality of well-being, psychological distress including depression, and internal focus. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) included training in activity planning, relaxation training and, primarily, cognitive restructuring. Sixty-five participants were recruited, and 41 completed treatment. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 8 weeks of manualized group CBT either immediately or after an 8-week waiting period. Participants completed outcome measures at the time of their random assignment and at 8, 16, and 52 weeks later. Repeated-measure analysis of covariance revealed significant group-by-time interactions on measures of tinnitus distress and depression, indicating that CBT led to greater improvement in those symptoms. The current results suggest that CBT, applied in a group format using a manual, can reduce the negative emotional distress, including depression, associated with tinnitus.

Antidepressant therapy in tinnitus.

OBJECTIVE: Review the literature on the co-morbidity of depression and anxiety with tinnitus. Briefly consider proposed mechanisms by which antidepressants might be helpful for tinnitus, including treatment of co-morbid depression and anxiety and a more direct serotonergic mechanism of tinnitus. Survey the literature on antidepressants and tinnitus including tinnitus reported as a side effect of antidepressants (phenelzine, amitriptyline, protriptyline, doxepin, imipramine, fluoxetine, trazadone, bupropion, venlafaxine), tinnitus associated with withdrawal of antidepressants (venlafaxine and sertraline) and antidepressants as a treatment for tinnitus (case reports--fluoxetine and paroxetine, retrospective reviews--imipramine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, single blind trials of amitriptyline and double blind placebo controlled trials of trimipramine, nortriptyline, paroxetine and sertraline). Provide suggestions on future directions, specifically replication of prior studies and a dose finding study of paroxetine for the treatment of tinnitus.

Randomized placebo-controlled trial of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in the treatment of nondepressed tinnitus subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (paroxetine) for relief of tinnitus. DESIGN: One hundred twenty tinnitus sufferers participated in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Paroxetine or placebo was increased to a maximally tolerated dose (up to 50 mg/day), and patients were treated for a total of 31 days at the maximal dose. METHODS: Patients with chronic tinnitus were recruited from our university-based specialty clinic by referral from otolaryngologists and audiologists in the local community and by advertisement. Patients with psychotic or substance use disorders or suicidal ideation were excluded, as were those using psychoactive medications (this resulted in only 1 subject with major depression in the study) or any other medications that interact with paroxetine and those with inability to hear at one's tinnitus sensation level. Fifty-eight percent of patients were male, 92% were Caucasian, and the average age was 57. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Tinnitus matching, the Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire, the question: How severe (bothered, aggravating) is your tinnitus? Quality of Well-Being and other psychological questionnaires. RESULTS: Paroxetine was not statistically superior to placebo on the following tinnitus measures (tinnitus matching, 5- or 10-db drop, Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire, quality of well-being measures, how severe, how bothered, positive change). There was a significant improvement in the single item question, How aggravating is your tinnitus? for those in the paroxetine group compared with the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the majority of individuals in this study did not benefit from paroxetine in a consistent fashion. Further work remains to be done to determine if subgroups of patients (e.g., those who tolerate higher doses, those who are depressed) may benefit.

Relationship of tinnitus questionnaires to depressive symptoms, quality of well-being, and internal focus.

Twenty percent of people endure tinnitus to a degree that their quality of well-being and productivity in life are impaired, and up to 60% report depression. Four measures are widely used to assess tinnitus-related distress, yet the relationship among all four measures or their relationship to relevant psychiatric variables has yet to be studied. This study assessed the association between the four commonly used measures of tinnitus and their relationship to depressive symptoms, quality of well-being, and internal focus. Sixty-five people with tinnitus completed the following measures: Iowa Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire (THQ); Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire (TRQ); Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI); Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ); Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD); Beck Depression Inventory (BDI); Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWBS); Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ); and Private Self-Consciousness Scale (PSCS). All the tinnitus measures were highly intercorrelated (r = .76-.90; all p values < .001), and related to depressive symptoms (r = .48-.66; p < .001) and QWBS (r = .37-.48; all p values < 0.008). The tinnitus measures correlated with the MSPQ (r = .37-.52; all p values < .01) but not with the PSCS. When controlling for the shared variance between tinnitus measures, the THQ independently predicted the HRSD, whereas the TRQ independently predicted the BDI.