Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Neurosci ; 40(29): 5549-5560, 2020 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32532889

ABSTRACT

Several features of the adult nervous systems develop in a "critical period" (CP), during which high levels of plasticity allow neural circuits to be tuned for optimal performance. Through an analysis of long-term olfactory habituation (LTH) in female Drosophila, we provide new insight into mechanisms by which CPs are regulated in vivo LTH manifests as a persistently reduced behavioral response to an odorant encountered for 4 continuous days and occurs together with the growth of specific, odorant-responsive glomeruli in the antennal lobe. We show that the CP for behavioral and structural plasticity induced by ethyl butyrate (EB) or carbon dioxide (CO2) closes within 48 h after eclosion. The elaboration of excitatory projection neuron (PN) processes likely contribute to glomerular volume increases, as follows: both occur together and similarly require cAMP signaling in the antennal lobe inhibitory local interneurons. Further, the CP for structural plasticity could be extended beyond 48 h if EB- or CO2-responsive olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) are silenced after eclosion; thus, OSN activity is required for closing the CP. Strikingly, silencing of glomerulus-selective OSNs extends the CP for structural plasticity only in respective target glomeruli. This indicates the existence of a local, short-range mechanism for regulating CP closure. Such a local mechanism for CP regulation can explain why plasticity induced by the odorant geranyl acetate (which is attractive) shows no CP although it involves the same core plasticity mechanisms as CO2 and EB. Local control of closure mechanisms during the critical period can potentially impart evolutionarily adaptive, odorant-specific features to behavioral plasticity.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The critical period for plasticity represents a stage of life at which animals learn specific tasks or features with particular facility. This work provides fresh evidence that mechanisms for regulating critical periods are broadly conserved across evolution. Thus, a critical period for long-term olfactory habituation in Drosophila, which closes early in adulthood can, like the critical period for ocular dominance plasticity in mammals, be extended by blocking sensory neurons early in life. Further observations show that critical periods for plasticity can be regulated by spatially restricted mechanisms, potentially allowing varied critical periods for plasticity to stimuli of different ethological relevance.


Subject(s)
Brain/growth & development , Habituation, Psychophysiologic/physiology , Interneurons/physiology , Neuronal Plasticity , Smell/physiology , Animals , Brain/cytology , Drosophila melanogaster , Female , Interneurons/cytology , Male , Odorants
2.
J Comp Neurol ; 526(1): 33-58, 2018 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28875566

ABSTRACT

The subesophageal zone (SEZ) of the Drosophila brain processes mechanosensory and gustatory sensory input from sensilla located on the head, mouth cavity and trunk. Motor output from the SEZ directly controls the movements involved in feeding behavior. In an accompanying paper (Hartenstein et al., ), we analyzed the systems of fiber tracts and secondary lineages to establish reliable criteria for defining boundaries between the four neuromeres of the SEZ, as well as discrete longitudinal neuropil domains within each SEZ neuromere. Here we use this anatomical framework to systematically map the sensory projections entering the SEZ throughout development. Our findings show continuity between larval and adult sensory neuropils. Gustatory axons from internal and external taste sensilla of the larva and adult form two closely related sensory projections, (a) the anterior central sensory center located deep in the ventromedial neuropil of the tritocerebrum and mandibular neuromere, and (b) the anterior ventral sensory center (AVSC), occupying a superficial layer within the ventromedial tritocerebrum. Additional, presumed mechanosensory terminal axons entering via the labial nerve define the ventromedial sensory center (VMSC) in the maxilla and labium. Mechanosensory afferents of the massive array of chordotonal organs (Johnston's organ) of the adult antenna project into the centrolateral neuropil column of the anterior SEZ, creating the antenno-mechanosensory and motor center (AMMC). Dendritic projections of dye back-filled motor neurons extend throughout a ventral layer of the SEZ, overlapping widely with the AVSC and VMSC. Our findings elucidate fundamental structural aspects of the developing sensory systems in Drosophila.


Subject(s)
Brain , Neuropil/cytology , Olfactory Pathways , Visceral Afferents , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Brain/cytology , Brain/embryology , Brain/growth & development , Cadherins/genetics , Cadherins/metabolism , Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal/genetics , Cell Adhesion Molecules, Neuronal/metabolism , Drosophila , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics , Green Fluorescent Proteins/metabolism , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Larva , Membrane Glycoproteins/genetics , Membrane Glycoproteins/metabolism , Microscopy, Confocal , Olfactory Pathways/cytology , Olfactory Pathways/embryology , Olfactory Pathways/growth & development , Pupa , Visceral Afferents/cytology , Visceral Afferents/embryology , Visceral Afferents/growth & development
3.
Elife ; 62017 02 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28211791

ABSTRACT

The precise coordination of body parts is essential for survival and behavior of higher organisms. While progress has been made towards the identification of central mechanisms coordinating limb movement, only limited knowledge exists regarding the generation and execution of sequential motor action patterns at the level of individual motoneurons. Here we use Drosophila proboscis extension as a model system for a reaching-like behavior. We first provide a neuroanatomical description of the motoneurons and muscles contributing to proboscis motion. Using genetic targeting in combination with artificial activation and silencing assays we identify the individual motoneurons controlling the five major sequential steps of proboscis extension and retraction. Activity-manipulations during naturally evoked proboscis extension show that orchestration of serial motoneuron activation does not rely on feed-forward mechanisms. Our data support a model in which central command circuits recruit individual motoneurons to generate task-specific proboscis extension sequences.


Subject(s)
Drosophila/physiology , Motor Neurons/cytology , Animal Structures/physiology , Animals , Drosophila/cytology , Feeding Behavior , Gene Silencing , Models, Neurological , Motor Neurons/physiology , Movement , Muscles/anatomy & histology , Muscles/physiology , Transcriptional Activation
5.
J Neurosci ; 35(1): 325-38, 2015 Jan 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25568125

ABSTRACT

Neurodevelopmental disorders arise from single or multiple gene defects. However, the way multiple loci interact to modify phenotypic outcomes remains poorly understood. Here, we studied phenotypes associated with mutations in the schizophrenia susceptibility gene dysbindin (dysb), in isolation or in combination with null alleles in the dysb network component Blos1. In humans, the Blos1 ortholog Bloc1s1 encodes a polypeptide that assembles, with dysbindin, into the octameric BLOC-1 complex. We biochemically confirmed BLOC-1 presence in Drosophila neurons, and measured synaptic output and complex adaptive behavior in response to BLOC-1 perturbation. Homozygous loss-of-function alleles of dysb, Blos1, or compound heterozygotes of these alleles impaired neurotransmitter release, synapse morphology, and homeostatic plasticity at the larval neuromuscular junction, and impaired olfactory habituation. This multiparameter assessment indicated that phenotypes were differentially sensitive to genetic dosages of loss-of-function BLOC-1 alleles. Our findings suggest that modification of a second genetic locus in a defined neurodevelopmental regulatory network does not follow a strict additive genetic inheritance, but rather, precise stoichiometry within the network determines phenotypic outcomes.


Subject(s)
Carrier Proteins/genetics , Drosophila Proteins/genetics , Gene Dosage/physiology , Nerve Net/physiology , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Schizophrenia/genetics , Synapses/genetics , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Drosophila , Dysbindin , Dystrophin-Associated Proteins , Female , Nerve Net/ultrastructure , Schizophrenia/physiopathology , Synapses/ultrastructure , Synaptic Transmission/physiology
6.
PLoS Biol ; 12(12): e1002013, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25460353

ABSTRACT

Most epithelial tubes arise as small buds and elongate by regulated morphogenetic processes including oriented cell division, cell rearrangements, and changes in cell shape. Through live analysis of Drosophila renal tubule morphogenesis we show that tissue elongation results from polarised cell intercalations around the tubule circumference, producing convergent-extension tissue movements. Using genetic techniques, we demonstrate that the vector of cell movement is regulated by localised epidermal growth factor (EGF) signalling from the distally placed tip cell lineage, which sets up a distal-to-proximal gradient of pathway activation to planar polarise cells, without the involvement for PCP gene activity. Time-lapse imaging at subcellular resolution shows that the acquisition of planar polarity leads to asymmetric pulsatile Myosin II accumulation in the basal, proximal cortex of tubule cells, resulting in repeated, transient shortening of their circumferential length. This repeated bias in the polarity of cell contraction allows cells to move relative to each other, leading to a reduction in cell number around the lumen and an increase in tubule length. Physiological analysis demonstrates that animals whose tubules fail to elongate exhibit abnormal excretory function, defective osmoregulation, and lethality.


Subject(s)
Cell Movement , Cell Polarity , Drosophila melanogaster/cytology , Epidermal Growth Factor/metabolism , Malpighian Tubules/embryology , Morphogenesis , Myosin Type II/metabolism , Signal Transduction , Animals , Cell Lineage , Drosophila melanogaster/embryology , Drosophila melanogaster/genetics , Embryo, Nonmammalian/cytology , Embryo, Nonmammalian/metabolism , Embryonic Development , Epithelium/embryology , Epithelium/metabolism , ErbB Receptors/metabolism , Genes, Insect , Homeostasis , Malpighian Tubules/cytology , Models, Biological
7.
Dev Biol ; 383(2): 275-84, 2013 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24051228

ABSTRACT

One of the most dramatic examples of programmed cell death occurs during Drosophila metamorphosis, when most of the larval tissues are destroyed in a process termed histolysis. Much of our understanding of this process comes from analyses of salivary gland and midgut cell death. In contrast, relatively little is known about the degradation of the larval musculature. Here, we analyze the programmed destruction of the abdominal dorsal exterior oblique muscle (DEOM) which occurs during the first 24h of metamorphosis. We find that ecdysone signaling through Ecdysone receptor isoform B1 is required cell autonomously for the muscle death. Furthermore, we show that the orphan nuclear receptor FTZ-F1, opposed by another nuclear receptor, HR39, plays a critical role in the timing of DEOM histolysis. Finally, we show that unlike the histolysis of salivary gland and midgut, abdominal muscle death occurs by apoptosis, and does not require autophagy. Thus, there is no set rule as to the role of autophagy and apoptosis during Drosophila histolysis.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/growth & development , Apoptosis , Drosophila melanogaster/growth & development , Ecdysone/metabolism , Metamorphosis, Biological , Muscles/metabolism , Muscles/pathology , Signal Transduction , Abdomen/pathology , Abdominal Muscles/enzymology , Abdominal Muscles/metabolism , Abdominal Muscles/pathology , Abdominal Muscles/ultrastructure , Animals , Autophagy , Caspases/metabolism , Drosophila Proteins/metabolism , Drosophila melanogaster/cytology , Drosophila melanogaster/enzymology , Drosophila melanogaster/ultrastructure , Epistasis, Genetic , Larva/metabolism , Larva/ultrastructure , Muscles/enzymology , Muscles/ultrastructure , Sarcomeres/metabolism , Sarcomeres/ultrastructure , Time Factors
8.
Dev Dyn ; 242(9): 1043-55, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23765941

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vertebrate muscles are defined and patterned at the stage of primary myotube formation, but there is no clear description of how these cells form in vivo. Of particular interest is whether primary myotubes are "seeded" by a unique myoblast population that differentiates as mononucleated myocytes, similar to the founder myoblasts of insects. RESULTS: We analyzed the cell populations and processes leading to initiation of primary myogenesis in limb buds of rats and mice. Pax3(+ve) myogenic precursors migrate into the limb bud and initially consolidate into dorsal and ventral muscle masses in the absence of Pax7 expression. Approximately a day later, Pax7(+ve) cells appear in the central aspect of the limb base and subsequently throughout the limb muscle masses. Primary myogenesis is initiated within each muscle mass at a time when only Pax3, and not Pax7, protein can be detected. Primary myotubes form initially as elongate mononucleated myocytes, well before cleavage of the muscle masses has occurred. Multinucleate myotubes appear approximately a day later. A similar process is seen during initiation of chick limb primary myogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: Primary myotubes of vertebrate limb muscles are initiated by mononucleated myocytes, that appear structurally analogous to the founder myoblasts of insects.


Subject(s)
Hindlimb/embryology , Muscle Development/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/embryology , Animals , Chick Embryo , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental/physiology , Mice , PAX3 Transcription Factor , PAX7 Transcription Factor/biosynthesis , Paired Box Transcription Factors/biosynthesis , Rats
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...