MLN4924 Inhibits Defective Ribosomal Product Antigen Presentation Independently of Direct NEDDylation of Protein Antigens.

Successful direct MHC class I Ag presentation is dependent on the protein degradation machinery of the cell to generate antigenic peptides that can be loaded onto MHC class I molecules for surveillance by CD8+ T cells of the immune system. Most often this process involves the ubiquitin (Ub)-proteasome system; however, other Ub-like proteins have also been implicated in protein degradation and direct Ag presentation. In this article, we examine the role of neuronal precursor cell-expressed developmentally downregulated protein 8 (NEDD8) in direct Ag presentation in mouse cells. NEDD8 is the Ub-like protein with highest similarity to Ub, and fusion of NEDD8 to the N terminus of a target protein can lead to the degradation of target proteins. We find that appending NEDD8 to the N terminus of the model Ag OVA resulted in degradation by both the proteasome and the autophagy protein degradation pathways, but only proteasomal degradation, involving the proteasomal subunit NEDD8 ultimate buster 1, resulted in peptide presentation. When directly compared with Ub, NEDD8 fusion was less efficient at generating peptides. However, inactivation of the NEDD8-conugation machinery by treating cells with MLN4924 inhibited the presentation of peptides from the defective ribosomal product-derived form of a model Ag. These results demonstrate that NEDD8 activity in the cell is important for direct Ag presentation, but not by directly targeting proteins for degradation.

The Many Potential Fates of Non-Canonical Protein Substrates Subject to NEDDylation.

Neuronal precursor cell-expressed developmentally down-regulated protein 8 (NEDD8) is a ubiquitin-like protein (UBL) whose canonical function involves binding to, and thus, activating Cullin-Ring finger Ligases (CRLs), one of the largest family of ubiquitin ligases in the eukaryotic cell. However, in recent years, several non-canonical protein substrates of NEDD8 have been identified. Here we attempt to review the recent literature regarding non-canonical NEDDylation of substrates with a particular focus on how the covalent modification of NEDD8 alters the protein substrate. Like much in the study of ubiquitin and UBLs, there are no clear and all-encompassing explanations to satisfy the textbooks. In some instances, NEDD8 modification appears to alter the substrates localization, particularly during times of stress. NEDDylation may also have conflicting impacts upon a protein's stability: some reports indicate NEDDylation may protect against degradation whereas others show NEDDylation can promote degradation. We also examine how many of the in vitro studies measuring non-canonical NEDDylation were conducted and compare those conditions to those which may occur in vivo, such as cancer progression. It is likely that the conditions used to study non-canonical NEDDylation are similar to some types of cancers, such as glioblastoma, colon and rectal cancers, and lung adenocarcinomas. Although the full outcomes of non-canonical NEDDylation remain unknown, our review of the literature suggests that researchers keep an open mind to the situations where this modification occurs and determine the functional impacts of NEDD8-modification to the specific substrates which they study.

Direct Conjugation of NEDD8 to the N-Terminus of a Model Protein Can Induce Degradation.

While the role of ubiquitin in protein degradation is well established, the role of other ubiquitin-like proteins (UBLs) in protein degradation is less clear. Neural precursor cell expressed developmentally down-regulated protein 8 (NEDD8) is the UBL with the highest level of amino acids identified when compared to ubiquitin. Here we tested if the N-terminal addition of NEDD8 to a protein of interest could lead to degradation. Mutation of critical glycine residues required for normal NEDD8 processing resulted in a non-cleavable fusion protein that was rapidly degraded within the cells by both the proteasome and autophagy. Both degradation pathways were dependent on a functional ubiquitin-conjugation system as treatment with MLN7243 increased levels of non-cleavable NEDD8-GFP. The degradation of non-cleavable, N-terminal NEDD8-GFP was not due to a failure of GFP folding as different NEDD8-GFP constructs with differing abilities to fold and fluoresce were similarly degraded. Though the fusion of NEDD8 to a protein resulted in degradation, treatment of cells with MLN4924, an inhibitor of the E1 activating enzyme for NEDD8, failed to prevent degradation of other destabilized substrates. Taken together these data suggest that under certain conditions, such as the model system described here, the covalent linkage of NEDD8 to a protein substrate may result in the target proteins degradation.