Comparison of anatomical and functional outcomes of vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling in recalcitrant diabetic macular edema with and without traction in Indian patients.

PURPOSE: To study and compare the outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with the internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling in the eyes with recalcitrant diabetic macular edema (DME) with and without vitreomacular traction. METHODS: A comparative prospective interventional study was undertaken in which group 1 included 45 eyes of 45 patients with DME with vitreomacular tractional component and group 2 included 45 eyes of 45 patients with recalcitrant DME without a tractional component. Both groups underwent standard PPV with ILM peeling. All the patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. The parameters evaluated were changes in the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) parameters, and occurrence of any intraoperative/postoperative surgical complication. RESULTS: The mean CMT improved significantly from 540.6 and 490.2 µm at the baseline to 292.5 and 270.6 µm at 6 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.001). The mean BCVA logMAR improved from 0.78 ± 0.21 to 0.62 ± 0.22 in group 1 and 0.84 ± 0.19 to 0.65 ± 0.21 in group 2 at 6 months follow-up which was not statistically significant. The improvement in the mfERG was seen in group 2 as a significant increase in P1 wave amplitude in ring 2 (2-5°) (P < 0.004) and a significant decrease in P 1 wave implicit time in ring 1 (central 2°) (P < 0.001). None of the eyes suffered from the loss of BCVA or any major surgical complication in either group. CONCLUSION: PPV in recalcitrant DME provides good anatomical outcomes and the results are comparable in DME with and without a tractional component.

Clinical features, optical coherence tomography findings and treatment outcomes of post-fever retinitis.

OBJECTIVES: To study the clinical features, optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings, treatment options and follow-up outcomes of post-fever retinitis (PFR). SUBJECTS: A total of 19 eyes of 13 patients, diagnosed with PFR (retinitis following febrile episode) over 2 years were retrospectively studied. METHODS: Documented history, baseline clinical features and systemic investigations performed for PFR were reviewed. Fundus findings, foveal architecture on swept-source OCT, the treatment options and the follow-up outcomes including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) were reviewed and analyzed. RESULTS: Common fundus findings included whitish retinitis lesions (100%), macular star (95%, 18eyes), retinal flame-shaped hemorrhages (63%, 12 eyes), inflammatory retinal vessels (30%, 6 eyes), vitreous hemorrhage (one eye) and OCT findings included neuro-sensory detachment (79%, 15 eyes), intraretinal white dots (89.5%,17 eyes). The baseline median log MAR BCVA and CFT were 1.30 (interquartile range (IQR):0.8-1.8) and 423 microns (IQR:182-555). Overall, nine patients (12 eyes) received a combination of oral doxycycline and oral steroids and four patients (7 eyes) received a combination of oral doxycycline, oral steroid and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (IVA). Significant improvement was evident at 8 weeks in median BCVA (0.50, IQR: 0.3-0.8, p < 0.05) and median CFT (223 micron, IQR: 170-256, p < 0.05) though only 26% (5 eyes) attained BCVA > = 6/12. CONCLUSION: Our study puts forth certain characteristic fundus and OCT features of PFR. A combination of oral doxycycline and oral steroids as a treatment option showed improvement in BCVA and CFT. Additional IVA helps in faster visual recovery in patients presenting with severe macular edema at onset.

Multifocal electroretinogram in eyes with intravitreal silicone oil and changes following silicone oil removal.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of intravitreal silicone oil (SO) on multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) and the changes in mfERG following SO removal. METHODS: Twelve eyes of 12 patients with SO in vitreous cavity with corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) > 20/200 were prospectively enrolled as cases over a period from July 2016 to June 2018. The fellow normal eyes served as control. The eyes were evaluated with P1 and N1 wave amplitude and implicit time on mfERG at baseline, 1 and 4 weeks after SO removal. RESULTS: The mean age was 44.9 ± 18.9 (range 18-74) years. The indication for SO injection was retinal detachment (n = 9, three macula-on eyes, six macula-off eyes) and endophthalmitis (n = 3). The median (range) LogMAR CDVA at baseline was 0.54 (0.18-0.78) in cases and did not change post-SO removal (p = 0.29). There was a significant decrease in average P1 and N1 wave amplitude (p = 0.0001 and 0.0001, respectively) and delay in average P1 and N1 wave implicit time (p = 0.0002 and 0.021, respectively) in cases as compared to controls. The macular status and duration of SO tamponade did not have a significant correlation with mfERG parameters. There was a significant increase in average P1 and N1 wave amplitude (p = 0.009 and 0.003, respectively) at 1 week following SO removal but no change in average P1 and N1 wave implicit time (p = 0.41 and 0.37, respectively). CONCLUSION: mfERG may be reliably performed for the assessment of macular function in SO-filled eyes. Intravitreal SO exerts an insulating effect on the density of the electric potentials.