Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ; 30(12): 34709-34719, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36515883

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus spp. and Mammaliicoccus spp. colonize the skin and mucosa of humans and other animals and are responsible for several opportunistic infections. Staphylococci antibiotic resistance may be present in the environment due to the spread of treated and untreated manure from the livestock industry due to antibiotic use to disease control or growth promoter. In this work, we analyzed the species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus and Mammaliicoccus species along different sites of a swine manure treatment plant from Southeastern Brazil. Bacterial colonies were obtained on mannitol salt agar, selected after catalase test and Gram staining, and finally identified by mass spectrometry and sequencing of the tuf gene. According to the results, S.cohnii and S. simulans were the most prevalent species. Antibiotic resistance test revealed that several strains were resistant to multiple drugs, with high levels of chloramphenicol resistance (98%), followed by erythromycin (79%), tetracycline (73%), gentamicin (46%), ciprofloxacin (42%), cefoxitin (18%), sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim (12%), and linezolid (4%). In addition, gene detection by PCR showed that all strains carried at least 2 resistance genes and one of them carried all 11 genes investigated. Using the GTG5-PCR approach, a high genetic similarity was observed between some strains that were isolated from different points of the treatment plant. Although some were seemingly identical, differences in their resistance phenotype and genotype suggest horizontal gene transfer. The presence of resistant bacteria and resistance genes along the treatment system highlights the potential risk of contamination by people in direct contact with these animals and the soil since the effluent is used as a biofertilizer in the surrounding environment.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Staphylococcus , Humans , Swine , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Manure , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Cefoxitin , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
2.
Infect Genet Evol ; 98: 105230, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35104683

ABSTRACT

As preconized by the One Health concept, the intimate relationship between pets and owners is a common source for the trade of microorganisms with zoonotic potential, and with them, antimicrobial resistance genes. In this work, we evaluated the presence of antimicrobial resistance genes, that are usually within mobile genetic elements, in a laboratory collection of 79 canine Staphylococcus strains, mostly Staphylococcus pseudintermedius and Staphylococcus coagulans. Resistance to tetracycline was observed in 34% of the strains, followed by resistance to erythromycin (21%) and gentamicin (19%). These phenotypes were partially correlated with the presence of the tetracycline resistance genes tet(M) and tet(K) in 64% and 44% of all strains, respectively; erythromycin resistance genes erm(A) and erm(C) in 53% and 23%; and gentamicin resistance gene aac(6')-aph(2″) in 26% of the strains. At least 45% of the strains harbored high- and/or low-molecular weight plasmids, whose transfer may be facilitated by their widespread biofilm-forming capacity, and absence of restrictive CRISPR systems. We selected eight plasmid-bearing and multidrug resistant strains, which were submitted to plasmid curing by stress with SDS. No strain lost resistance during stressing cultivation but, by conjugation experiments, the S. pseudintermedius strain 27 transferred its plasmid-borne resistance to gentamicin, conferred by the aac(6')-aph(2″) gene, to Staphylococcus aureus. The frequent empirical use of gentamicin to treat skin and ear infections in domestic dogs is likely to select resistant strains. Also, as demonstrated by our study, these strains can serve as gene reservoirs for human pathogens, such as S. aureus.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Gentamicins/pharmacology , Plasmids/radiation effects , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Staphylococcus/drug effects , Animals , Dogs
3.
Braz J Microbiol ; 53(1): 205-212, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34993919

ABSTRACT

The prevalence and risk factors for gut carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli among individuals living in the community in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of colonization with antimicrobial-resistant E. coli, including isolates producing ESBL and harboring plasmid-mediated quinolone resistant (PMQR) genes in this community. We performed a cross-sectional study and analyzed fecal specimens of individuals attending outpatient clinics in the city from January 2015 to July 2019. We investigated susceptibility to antimicrobial agents by disc diffusion tests and used PCR to determine ESBL types, PMQR, and the virulence genes that characterize an isolate as extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC). Among the 623 subjects, 212 (34%) carried an isolate resistant to at least one of the tested antimicrobial agents, with the highest frequencies of resistance to ampicillin (26%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (19%), cefazolin (14%), and ciprofloxacin (CIP, 9%). In addition, 13% (81) of subjects carried a multidrug-resistant-E. coli (MDR-E), including 47 (8% of all isolates) ESBL-producing E. coli (ESBL-E), mainly of CTX-M-8 (15, 32%) and CTX-M-15 (9, 20%) types. PMQR genes were present in 7% (42) of all isolates, including 60% (32) of the 53 resistant to CIP. Previous use of antimicrobial agents, particularly fluoroquinolones, was a risk factor for colonization with MDR-E (25%, 20/81 vs 13%, 70/542, p = 0.01), ESBL-E (28%, 13/47, vs 13%, 77/576, p = 0.01), and resistance to CIP (26%, 14/53, vs 12%, 70/570, p = 0.01). The most pathogenic phylogroups B2, C, and D were 37% of the MDR-E, 30% of the ESBL-E, 38% of the CIP-resistant, and 31% of PMQR gene carrying E. coli isolates. We show that carriage of MDR-E (mostly ESBL-E) reached high levels in the community in Rio de Janeiro, increased by the selection of antimicrobial agents. Much of the resistant E. coli isolates are potential pathogenic strains. The widespread use of antimicrobial agents during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil may have worsened this picture.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Escherichia coli Infections , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Escherichia coli , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , beta-Lactamases/genetics
5.
Travel Med Infect Dis ; 41: 102028, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33737162

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance is increased by international mobility. We present data about intestinal colonization of travelers departing from a middle-income country. METHODS: Travelers were recruited from 2015 to 2019, collected an anal stool specimen and answered a questionnaire before and after travel. Enterobacterales isolates were investigated for antimicrobial resistance; extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase production; plasmid-encoded cephalosporinases (pAmpC), plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) and mcr genes by PCR and sequencing; and association with travel related variables. RESULTS: Among 210 travelers, 26 (12%) carried multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales (MDR-E) and 18 (9%) ESBL-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) before travel, with an increased prevalence from 1% to 11% over the study years. Acquisition of MDR-E and ESBL-E occurred in 59 (32%) and 43 (22%) travelers, respectively, mostly blaCTX-M-15 carrying Escherichia coli. One traveler acquired one isolate carrying blaOXA-181 gene, and two others, isolates carrying mcr-1. PMQR were detected in 14 isolates of returning travelers. The risk of MDR-E acquisition was higher in Southeast Asia and the Indian subcontinent, and after using antimicrobial agents. CONCLUSION: We describe an increasing pre-travel prevalence of ESBL-E colonization in subjects departing from this middle-income country over time. Travel to known risk areas and use of antimicrobial agents during travel were associated with acquisition of MDR-E. Travel advice is critical to mitigating this risk, as colonization by MDR-E may raise the chances of antimicrobial-resistant infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Travel , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Brazil/epidemiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/genetics , Humans , Travel-Related Illness , beta-Lactamases/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...