Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 91, 2024 Jan 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38267883

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association of current and childhood socioeconomic status (SES) with patient-reported functional status, quality of life and disability in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Cross-sectional study amongst individuals seeking care for any medical reason in a primary care family-practice clinic in Mexico City. We included individuals with self-reported doctor-diagnosed arthritis, recruited through waiting-room posters and invitations by treating family physicians. We administered a survey using validated Spanish language versions of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Osteoarthritis of Lower Limbs and Quality of Life (AMICAL), and the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). To estimate current and childhood SES, we collected data on education level and occupation type for both the patient and their parents, as well as using a validated tool to estimate income quintile. RESULTS: We recruited 154 patients and excluded 8 patients. There was a high correlation between outcome scores. Estimated income and education levels were correlated with WOMAC, AMICAL and HAQ-DI scores, and significant differences were found in all scores by occupation type. The associations for current SES variables and outcome scores remained significant independently of age, sex, BMI, and presence of diabetes or hypertension, and were largely explained by current income in mutually adjusted models. Childhood SES - in particular as measured through maternal education - was best correlated with AMICAL scores, though its effect seemed largely mediated by its association with current SES. CONCLUSIONS: Current Socioeconomic Status impacts functional status, quality of life and disability amongst OA patients in Mexico City. The WOMAC, AMICAL and HAQ-DI scores correlate with each other and are all potentially useful markers of disease severity. More research is needed to elucidate the relationships between childhood SES and OA outcomes. Awareness of life-course SES may be useful in identifying patients at risk for worse outcomes.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Hip , Child , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Hip/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis, Hip/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Mexico/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Lower Extremity , Outcome Assessment, Health Care
2.
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc ; 61(Suppl 3): S387-S394, 2023 Oct 02.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37934733

ABSTRACT

Background: The use of benzodiazepines as a treatment for insomnia can have side effects such as impaired coordination causing falls in adults and even dependence. Objective: To assess the factors associated with dependence on benzodiazepines in patients with insomnia. Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, prospective, and analytical study, at the first level of care. Patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of insomnia and a benzodiazepine prescription were selected. The dependency was measured with the International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Results: 107 patients were included. Median age 67 years, predominantly female (72%), 74% attended secondary school or more, 71% had more than 3 years of diagnosis, 84% used clonazepam. The 54% presented dependency. In the bivariate analysis, schooling RM 0.392 (95%CI: 0.15-0.96) p = 0.038, moderate and severe clinical insomnia RM 3.618 (95%CI: 1.44-9.08) p = 0.005 and more than 3 years of diagnosis RM 2.428 (95%CI: 1.03-5.71) p = 0.040. In the multivariate model, schooling (p = 0.084), years of diagnosis (p = 0.062) and frequency of consumption (p = 0.065) obtained an R2 of 0.13. Conclusions: Primary schooling showed a lower risk of presenting dependence on benzodiazepines. The risk was increased in those with more than 3 years of diagnosis, and in those with moderate and severe insomnia.


Introducción: el uso de benzodiacepinas como tratamiento para el insomnio puede tener efectos secundarios, como el deterioro de la coordinación que puede provocar caídas en adultos e, incluso, dependencia. Objetivo: evaluar los factores asociados a la dependencia a benzodiacepinas en pacientes con insomnio. Material y métodos: estudio observacional, transversal, prospectivo y analítico, llevado a cabo en el primer nivel de atención. Se seleccionaron pacientes mayores de 18 años con diagnóstico de insomnio y prescripción de benzodiacepina. La dependencia se midió con la Entrevista Neuropsiquiátrica Internacional. Resultados: se incluyeron 107 pacientes, la mediana de edad fue de 67 años, con predominio del sexo femenino (72%), el 74% cursó educación secundaria o más, el 71% tenía más de tres años con diagnóstico de insomnio, el 84% usaba clonazepan. El 54% presentó dependencia. En el análisis bivariado, la escolaridad primaria mostró una razón de momios (RM) de 0.392 (IC95%: 0.15-0.96), p = 0.038; el insomnio clínico moderado y grave RM de 3.618 (IC95%: 1.44-9.08) p = 0.005, y más de tres años de diagnóstico con una RM de 2.428 (IC95%: 1.03-5.71) p = 0.040. En el modelo multivariado, la escolaridad (p = 0.084), los años de diagnóstico (p = 0.062) y la frecuencia de consumo (p = 0.065) obtuvieron una R2 de 0.13. Conclusiones: los pacientes con escolaridad primaria mostraron un menor riesgo de presentar dependencia a benzodiacepinas. El riesgo se incrementó en los pacientes con más de tres años de diagnóstico y en aquellos con insomnio moderado y grave.


Subject(s)
Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Substance-Related Disorders , Adult , Humans , Female , Aged , Male , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/diagnosis , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/chemically induced , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prospective Studies , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology
3.
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc ; 60(2): 134-141, 2022 Mar 01.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35758923

ABSTRACT

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a great impact and high cost on the education of physicians that has not been determined in the long term. Objective: To determine the impact of COVID-19 on undergraduate interns and how it affected their academic training. Material and methods: Mixed study. Qualifications of the bimonthly departmental exam from 2018 to 2020 of the FACMED-UNAM internal doctors were reviewed, the focus group technique was used to investigate their experience and repercussions during the pandemic. Results: The grade point average for 18-19 was 70.76+/- 10.12. In 2020 76.19+/-10.66 (p = 0.000). In the CDMX 2018-2019 an average 70,405+/-10,156 against 71.97+/- 10.28 of foreign headquarters (p > 0.05). In 2020, the capital's headquarters an average of 77.02+/-10.31 against 73.86+/-11.296 in the interior (p = 0.000). When comparing the bimonthly ratings, there were no significant differences in 2018 and 2019; However, in 2020 there is an increase from 69.40 +/-9.538 to 79.39 +/-10.709. Conclusions: The ratings for 2020 had better results in relation to 2018 and 2019, they were higher in capital cities in relation to foreign ones. The retrospective perception of the inmates was that they had more time to study thematic contents and less pressure in the care work; They stated that they would have preferred to stay in their rotations, with the necessary protective equipment to avoid getting infected.


Introducción: la pandemia por COVID-19 ha tenido un gran impacto y alto costo en la educación de los médicos en formación que no ha sido determinado a largo plazo. Objetivo: determinar el impacto del COVID-19 en médicos internos de pregrado y cómo repercutió en su formación académica. Material y métodos: estudio mixto en el que se revisaron las calificaciones del examen departamental bimestral del 2018 al 2020 de los médicos internos Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; se utilizó la técnica de grupos focales para indagar su experiencia y repercusiones durante la pandemia. Resultados: el promedio de calificaciones de los años 2018-2019 fue de 70.76 +/- 10.12. En el 2020 de 76.19 +/- 10.66 (p = 0.000). En la CDMX durante 2018-2019 se registró una media de 70.40 +/- 10.15 frente a 71.97 +/- 10.28 de las sedes foráneas (p > 0.05). En el 2020, las sedes de la capital tuvieron una media de 77.02 +/- 10.31 frente a 73.86 +/- 11.296 de las del interior (p = 0.000). Al comparar las calificaciones bimestrales, no hubo diferencias significativas en 2018 y 2019; sin embargo, en el 2020 hubo una elevación de 69.40 +/- 9.538 a 79.39 +/- 10.70. Conclusiones: se registraron mejores resultados en las calificaciones del 2020 en relación con las del 2018 y 2019, estas fueron más altas en las sedes capitalinas en relación con las foráneas. La percepción retrospectiva de los internos fue que dispusieron de más tiempo para el estudio de contenidos temáticos y menor presión en el trabajo asistencial; declararon que hubieran preferido quedarse en sus rotaciones, con el equipo de protección necesario para evitar contagiarse.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Physicians , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Focus Groups , Humans , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies
4.
Rev. Méd. Inst. Mex. Seguro Soc ; 60(2): 134-141, abr. 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1367303

ABSTRACT

Introducción: la pandemia por COVID-19 ha tenido un gran impacto y alto costo en la educación de los médicos en formación que no ha sido determinado a largo plazo. Objetivo: determinar el impacto del COVID-19 en médicos internos de pregrado y cómo repercutió en su formación académica. Material y métodos: estudio mixto en el que se revisaron las calificaciones del examen departamental bimestral del 2018 al 2020 de los médicos internos Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; se utilizó la técnica de grupos focales para indagar su experiencia y repercusiones durante la pandemia. Resultados: el promedio de calificaciones de los años 2018-2019 fue de 70.76 +/- 10.12. En el 2020 de 76.19 +/- 10.66 (p = 0.000). En la CDMX durante 2018-2019 se registró una media de 70.40 +/- 10.15 frente a 71.97 +/- 10.28 de las sedes foráneas (p > 0.05). En el 2020, las sedes de la capital tuvieron una media de 77.02 +/- 10.31 frente a 73.86 +/- 11.296 de las del interior (p = 0.000). Al comparar las calificaciones bimestrales, no hubo diferencias significativas en 2018 y 2019; sin embargo, en el 2020 hubo una elevación de 69.40 +/- 9.538 a 79.39 +/- 10.70. Conclusiones: se registraron mejores resultados en las calificaciones del 2020 en relación con las del 2018 y 2019, estas fueron más altas en las sedes capitalinas en relación con las foráneas. La percepción retrospectiva de los internos fue que dispusieron de más tiempo para el estudio de contenidos temáticos y menor presión en el trabajo asistencial; declararon que hubieran preferido quedarse en sus rotaciones, con el equipo de protección necesario para evitar contagiarse.


Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a great impact and hig+h cost on the education of physicians that has not been determined in the long term. Objective: To determine the impact of COVID-19 on undergraduate interns and how it affected their academic training. Material and methods: Mixed study. Qualifications of the bimonthly departmental exam from 2018 to 2020 of the FACMED-UNAM internal doctors were reviewed, the focus group technique was used to investigate their experience and repercussions during the pandemic. Results: The grade point average for 18-19 was 70.76+/10.12. In 2020 76.19+/-10.66 (p = 0.000). In the CDMX 2018-2019 an average 70,405+/-10,156 against 71.97+/10.28 of foreign headquarters (p > 0.05). In 2020, the capital's headquarters an average of 77.02+/-10.31 against 73.86+/-11.296 in the interior (p = 0.000). When comparing the bimonthly ratings, there were no significant differences in 2018 and 2019; However, in 2020 there is an increase from 69.40 +/-9.538 to 79.39 +/-10.709. Conclusions: The ratings for 2020 had better results in relation to 2018 and 2019, they were higher in capital cities in relation to foreign ones. The retrospective perception of the inmates was that they had more time to study thematic contents and less pressure in the care work; They stated that they would have preferred to stay in their rotations, with the necessary protective equipment to avoid getting infected.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Professional Practice , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Academic Performance/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19 , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Sex Distribution , Mexico
5.
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc ; 57(2): 118-123, 2019 Jul 31.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31618567

ABSTRACT

Background: Annular pancreas is a congenital abnormality which causes duodenal obstruction in neonates. It befalls upon 1 patient amongst every 12 000-15 000 newborns. It often appears in adulthood. Clinical traits include abdominal pain, intestinal obstruction, vomiting, and pancreatitis. The diagnosis requires image studies and surgical exploration. Clinical case: Female patient, 11 years of age, presenting intermittent chronic abdominal pain, underweight for her age. Treated by a private physician with ranitidine (4 mg/kg/day) and ibuprofen (5 mg/kg/dose) orally, for one month, due to acid-peptic disease. On December 31, 2017, she was attended at Pediatric Emergency presenting epigastric pain, and nausea. She vomited bile contents 4 times over a 24 hour span. Other symptoms included painful reaction to epigastric palpation, positive pancreatic points, negative Murphy's sign, no hepatomegaly or splenomegaly, decreased peristaltic noises. Reported: amylase 2163 U/L, lipase 821 U/L, lactic dehydrogenase 461 U/L. Pancreatic ultrasound: 19.3 mm head, 23.2 mm body and 10 mm tail. She was admitted to pediatrics, where the annular pancreas condition was confirmed through ultrasound and computed tomography scan. She then underwent conservative treatment. Conclusion: The patient displayed typical annular pancreas symptoms. Image studies were key to the diagnosis.


Introducción: el páncreas anular es una anomalía congénita que causa obstrucción duodenal en el neonato. Se reporta en 1 por cada 12 000-15 000 recién nacidos, a menudo se revela en la edad adulta. Clínicamente incluye obstrucción intestinal, dolor abdominal, vómitos y puntos pancreáticos positivos. El diagnóstico requiere estudios de imagenología y exploración quirúrgica. Caso clínico: paciente del sexo femenino, de 11 años de edad, con dolor abdominal crónico intermitente, de bajo peso para su edad. Tratada por médico privado con ranitidina (4 mg/kg/día) e ibuprofeno (5 mg/kg/dosis) vía oral, durante un mes, por enfermedad acido-péptica. El 31 de diciembre del 2017 fue atendida en urgencias pediátricas, por dolor en epigastrio, náuseas y vómitos de contenido gastrobiliar en número de 4 en 24 horas. Abdomen doloroso a la palpación en epigastrio, puntos pancreáticos positivos, Murphy negativo, sin hepatomegalia ni esplenomegalia, ruidos peristálticos disminuidos. Se reportó: amilasa 2163 U/L, lipasa 821 U/L, deshidrogenasa láctica 461 U/L. Ultrasonido de páncreas: cabeza de 19.3 mm, cuerpo de 23.2 mm y cola de 10 mm. Fue internada en pediatría, confirmándose páncreas anular por ultrasonido y tomografía; recibió tratamiento conservador. Conclusión: la paciente presentó síntomas típicos del páncreas anular, su estudio mediante imágenes fue decisivo para establecer el diagnóstico.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/etiology , Pancreas/abnormalities , Pancreatic Diseases/complications , Pancreatic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Child , Female , Humans , Pancreas/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Abdominal , Stomach/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...