Computed Tomography Scan Versus Saline Load Test in the Detection of Traumatic Arthrotomies of the Ankle: A Cadaveric Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity and ability of computed tomography (CT) scan for diagnosing traumatic ankle arthrotomies compared with that of the saline load test (SLT). METHODS: Eleven cadaveric ankles were included in this study. Before intervention, a CT scan was obtained to confirm the absence of intra-articular air. Arthrotomies were created at the anterolateral, posterolateral, anteromedial, and posteromedial aspects of the ankle under fluoroscopic visualization. A postarthrotomy and postrange of motion CT scan was obtained to evaluate for the presence of intra-articular air. Each ankle then underwent a SLT with 60 mL of saline, where volumes provoking extravasation were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 11 included ankles, intra-articular air was detected in all 11 ankles by CT scan. All 11 ankles also demonstrated extravasation of saline through the arthrotomy site during SLT. Thus, the sensitivity for both CT scan and SLT for detecting ankle traumatic arthrotomy was 100%. The mean volume of saline needed for extravasation was 7.7 mL, with a range of 3-22 mL and a SD of 5.4. CONCLUSIONS: Given that CT scan was equally as sensitive to the SLT, this study presents good evidence that CT scan may be used for the detection of ankle traumatic arthrotomies.

Computed Tomography Scan Versus Saline Load Test for Detection of Traumatic Shoulder Arthrotomy: A Cadaveric Study.

OBJECTIVES: Traumatic shoulder arthrotomy (TSA) is a rare injury that is commonly detected through saline load test (SLT). There are no studies that have studied the ability of computed tomography (CT) scan to detect a TSA. The purpose of this study is to determine the ability of CT scan to detect a TSA and compare it with the SLT. METHODS: Twelve cadaveric shoulders were included in the study. Before intervention, a CT scan was conducted to determine presence of intra-articular air. After confirmation that no air was present, an arthrotomy was made at the anterior or posterior portal site. A CT was obtained postarthrotomy to evaluate for intra-articular air. Each shoulder then underwent an SLT to assess the sensitivity of SLT and the volume needed for extravasation. RESULTS: Twelve shoulders were included after a pre-intervention CT scan. Six shoulders received an arthrotomy through the anterior portal and six shoulders received an arthrotomy through the posterior portal. After the arthrotomy, air was visualized on CT scan in 11 of the 12 shoulders (92%). All 12 shoulders demonstrated extravasation during SLT. The mean volume of saline needed for extravasation was 29 mL with an SD of 10 and range of 18-50 mL. CONCLUSIONS: CT scan is a sensitive modality (sensitivity of 92%) for detection of TSA. In comparison, SLT is more sensitive (sensitivity of 100%) and outperforms CT scan for the diagnosis of TSA in a cadaveric model. Further research is needed to solidify the role that CT imaging has in the diagnosis of TSAs.

Perioperative management of leg-length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty: a review.

Leg-length discrepancy (LLD) presents a significant management challenge to orthopedic surgeons and remains a leading cause of patient dissatisfaction and litigation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Over or under-lengthening of the operative extremity has been shown to have inferior outcomes, such as dislocation, exacerbation of back pain and sciatica, and general dissatisfaction postoperatively. The management of LLD in the setting of THA is multifactorial, and must be taken into consideration in the pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative settings. In our review, we aim to summarize the best available practices and techniques for minimizing LLD through each of these phases of care. Pre-operatively, we provide an overview of the appropriate radiographic studies to be obtained and their interpretation, as well as considerations to be made when templating. Intra-operatively, we discuss several techniques for the assessment of limb length in real time, and post-operatively, we discuss both operative and non-operative management of LLD. By providing a summary of the best available practices and strategies for mitigating the impact of a perceived LLD in the setting of THA, we hope to maximize the potential for an excellent surgical and clinical outcome.

Conversion total hip arthroplasty following extracapsular hip fracture fixation with a cephalomedullary device: a comprehensive review.

With the annual incidence of hip fractures and hip fracture fixation rising, the need for conversion total hip arthroplasty has also risen. About half of the 280,000 hip fractures that occur annually in the United States are extracapsular. Commonly extracapsular hip fractures are treated with either cephalomedullary nails (CMNs) or sliding hip screws (SHS). More recently, there has been a shift toward increased CMN use due to increased training with this fixation method as well as perioperative and biomechanical benefits. Given this shift, orthopedic surgeons need to understand the factors that lead to CMN failure. Failed CMN treatment leaves both patients and surgeons with few management options including revision fixation with or without osteotomy, conversion total hip arthroplasty, and conversion hemiarthroplasty. Surgeons must consider the patient and injury characteristics before deciding the best treatment plan. Conversion total hip arthroplasty is indicated in younger patients without femoral head and/or acetabular articular injury, degenerative joint disease, or avascular necrosis. Conversion total arthroplasty is a technically demanding and resource-intensive surgery associated with lower success rates and outcomes than primary total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedic surgeons should have thorough understanding of preoperative workup needed prior to surgery, implant selection associated with best outcomes, most common surgical approaches used, intraoperative considerations, and complications associated with conversion total hip arthroplasty. A comprehensive understanding of these concepts gives patients the best chance of having a successful outcome.

Team Approach: Management of Geriatric Acetabular Fractures.

¼: Geriatric acetabular fractures are defined as fractures sustained by patients who are ≥60 years old. With the rapidly aging American populace and its increasingly active lifestyle, the prevalence of these injuries will continue to increase. ¼: An interdisciplinary approach is necessary to ensure successful outcomes. This begins in the emergency department with hemodynamic stabilization, diagnosis of the fracture, identification of comorbidities and concomitant injuries, as well as early consultation with the orthopaedic surgery service. This multifaceted approach is continued when patients are admitted, and trauma surgery, geriatrics, and cardiology teams are consulted. These teams are responsible for the optimization of complex medical conditions and risk stratification prior to operative intervention. ¼: Treatment varies depending on a patient's preinjury functional status, the characteristics of the fracture, and the patient's ability to withstand surgery. Nonoperative management is recommended for patients with minimally displaced fractures who cannot tolerate the physiologic stress of surgery. Percutaneous fixation is a treatment option most suited for patients with minimally displaced fractures who are at risk for displacing the fracture or are having difficulty mobilizing because of pain. Open reduction and internal fixation is recommended for patients with displaced acetabular fractures who are medically fit for surgery and have a displaced fracture pattern that would do poorly without operative intervention. Fixation in combination with arthroplasty can be done acutely or in delayed fashion. Acute fixation combined with arthroplasty benefits patients who have poorer bone quality and fracture characteristics that make healing unlikely. Delayed arthroplasty is recommended for patients who have had failure of nonoperative management, have a fracture pattern that is not favorable to primary total hip arthroplasty, or have developed posttraumatic arthritis.

Fentanyl versus remifentanil-based TIVA for pediatric scoliosis repair: does it matter?

INTRODUCTION: Opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) and acute opioid tolerance have been demonstrated extensively in patients undergoing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) repair. Remifentanil infusion has been strongly linked to both tolerance and OIH in these patients; however, the impact of using an intraoperative fentanyl infusion has not been well studied. This study aims to determine if patients undergoing operative management of AIS have decreased opioid consumption and pain scores when an intraoperative fentanyl infusion is used as compared with a remifentanil infusion. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of patients with AIS who underwent posterior spinal fusion. During the period January 2012-June 2013, patients received remifentanil infusion as part of total intravenous anesthesia. From July 2013 to June 2015, remifentanil was replaced by fentanyl as standard protocol. The remifentanil cohort included 37 patients and the fentanyl cohort included 25 patients. The primary outcome was the total opioid consumption (morphine equivalents) in the first 24 hours postsurgery. Secondary outcomes included mean postoperative pain score in the first 24 hours postsurgery, postoperative opioid consumption 24-48 hours after surgery, time to extubation, time to assisted ambulation, length of stay, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: Compared with the remifentanil group, the fentanyl group had significantly higher postoperative opioid usage during the first 48 hours and significantly higher postoperative mean pain score during the first 24 hours. There was no difference between the two groups in mean pain score for 24-48 hours, extubation time, time to assisted ambulation, length of stay, or postoperative nausea and vomiting. DISCUSSION: Despite concerns for hyperalgesia and acute tolerance, remifentanil is widely used for intraoperative opioid infusions for surgical correction of AIS. This retrospective study examined a practice change from intraoperative remifentanil to intraoperative fentanyl as a potential approach to avoid OIH. Surprisingly, patients receiving fentanyl intraoperatively showed increased postoperative opioid use and pain scores in the first 24 hours postsurgery compared with the prior cohort receiving remifentanil. Substitution of fentanyl for remifentanil during surgical correction of AIS does not appear to solve the problem of OIH or acute tolerance. Prospective studies are needed to confirm this unexpected result.