ABSTRACT
Resumen Introducción: La relación entre 25-OH-vitamina D y el sistema inmune en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica es objeto de atención. Objetivos: Evaluar la prevalencia de la deficiencia de vitamina D en pacientes en hemodiálisis e investigar la asociación entre la vitamina D y proteína C reactiva ultrasensible (PCRus), índice neutrófilo/linfocito (INL) e índice plaqueta/linfocito (IPL). Método: Estudio transversal de 80 pacientes en hemodiálisis, divididos en dos grupos: un nivel sérico de 25-OH-vitamina D < 20 ng/mL se consideró como deficiencia de vitamina D y ≥ 20 ng/mL, como normal. Con el análisis de correlación de Spearman se definió la relación entre los parámetros. Resultados: 40 % de los pacientes presentó deficiencia de vitamina D. Hubo diferencias significativas entre los grupos en PCRus (p = 0.047), INL (p = 0.039), IPL (p = 0.042) y tratamiento con análogos de vitamina D (p = 0.022). La vitamina D tuvo una correlación negativa significativa con PCRus (p = 0.026), INL (p = 0.013) e IPL (p = 0.022). Conclusiones: La deficiencia de vitamina D fue de 40 %. Los niveles de PCRus, INL e IPL fueron significativamente más altos ante deficiencia de vitamina D. Se encontró correlación inversa significativa entre vitamina D y PCRus, INL e IPL.
Abstract Introduction: The relationship between 25-OH-vitamin D and the immune system in patients with chronic kidney disease is a subject of attention. Objectives: To assess the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients on hemodialysis and to investigate the association between vitamin D, ultra-sensitive C-reactive protein (US-CRP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Method: Cross-sectional study of 80 patients on hemodialysis, divided into two groups: a serum 25-OH-vitamin D level < 20 ng/mL was considered to be vitamin D deficiency and a serum level ≥ 20 ng/mL was regarded as normal. The relationship between the parameters was defined with Spearmans correlation analysis. Results: 40 % of the patients had vitamin D deficiency. There were significant differences between groups in US-CRP (p = 0.047), NLR (p = 0.039), PLR (p = 0.042) and treatment with vitamin D analogues (p = 0.022). Vitamin D had a significant negative correlation with US-CRP (p = 0.026), NLR (p = 0.013) and PLR (p = 0.022). Conclusions: The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was 40 %. The values of US-CRP, NLR and PLR were significantly higher in the presence of vitamin D deficiency. A significant inverse correlation was found between vitamin D levels and US-CRP, NLR and PLR.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Vitamin D/blood , Vitamin D Deficiency/blood , Vitamin D Deficiency/epidemiology , Renal Dialysis , Inflammation Mediators/blood , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/blood , Blood Platelets/cytology , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Lymphocytes/cytology , Biomarkers/blood , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Neutrophils/cytologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The relationship between 25-OH-vitamin D and the immune system in patients with chronic kidney disease is a subject of attention. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in patients on hemodialysis and to investigate the association between vitamin D, ultra-sensitive C-reactive protein (US-CRP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). METHOD: Cross-sectional study of 80 patients on hemodialysis, divided into two groups: a serum 25-OH-vitamin D level < 20 ng/mL was considered to be vitamin D deficiency and a serum level ≥ 20 ng/mL was regarded as normal. The relationship between the parameters was defined with Spearman's correlation analysis. RESULTS: 40 % of the patients had vitamin D deficiency. There were significant differences between groups in US-CRP (p = 0.047), NLR (p = 0.039), PLR (p = 0.042) and treatment with vitamin D analogues (p = 0.022). Vitamin D had a significant negative correlation with US-CRP (p = 0.026), NLR (p = 0.013) and PLR (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was 40 %. The values of US-CRP, NLR and PLR were significantly higher in the presence of vitamin D deficiency. A significant inverse correlation was found between vitamin D levels and US-CRP, NLR and PLR. INTRODUCCIÓN: La relación entre 25-OH-vitamina D y el sistema inmune en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica es objeto de atención. OBJETIVOS: Evaluar la prevalencia de la deficiencia de vitamina D en pacientes en hemodiálisis e investigar la asociación entre la vitamina D y proteína C reactiva ultrasensible (PCRus), índice neutrófilo-linfocito (INL) e índice plaqueta-linfocito (IPL). MÉTODO: Estudio transversal de 80 pacientes en hemodiálisis, divididos en dos grupos: un nivel sérico de 25-OH-vitamina D < 20 ng/mL se consideró como deficiencia de vitamina D y ≥ 20 ng/mL, como normal. Con el análisis de correlación de Spearman se definió la relación entre los parámetros. RESULTADOS: 40 % de los pacientes presentó deficiencia de vitamina D. Hubo diferencias significativas entre los grupos en PCRus (p = 0.047), INL (p = 0.039), IPL (p = 0.042) y tratamiento con análogos de vitamina D (p = 0.022). La vitamina D tuvo una correlación negativa significativa con PCRus (p = 0.026), INL (p = 0.013) e IPL (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONES: La deficiencia de vitamina D fue de 40 %. Los niveles de PCRus, INL e IPL fueron significativamente más altos ante deficiencia de vitamina D. Se encontró correlación inversa significativa entre vitamina D y PCRus, INL e IPL.
Subject(s)
Inflammation Mediators/blood , Renal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/blood , Vitamin D Deficiency/blood , Vitamin D Deficiency/epidemiology , Vitamin D/blood , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Blood Platelets/cytology , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Lymphocytes/cytology , Male , Neutrophils/cytology , Prevalence , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the best treatment for end-stage renal disease. In this setting, a significant percentage of transplants are not undertaken because of medical and nonmedical reasons of both donors and recipients. However, the impact of these discards in a transplant program has not been identified thoroughly so far. Our objective was to clarify key reasons for exclusion of LDKTs and the consequences for the discarded transplant candidates in the following 5 years. METHODS: Analysis of donors' and recipients' characteristics of 781 couples evaluated in our hospital from January 2005 to December 2013. The consequences of discards in transplant candidates were analyzed in the cohort 2012 to 2013 (n = 106) and followed up until October 2018. RESULTS: In our study group, 402 (51.5%) LDKT couples were successfully donated, and 379 (48.5%) were excluded. Donor and transplant recipient candidates discarded were older at the evaluation (55.07 ± 12.14 years vs 51.73 ± 10.93 years, P < .001; 48.81 ± 14.05 years vs 44.62 ± 13.91 years, P < .001, respectively). The most frequent reason for kidney discard was medical contraindication found in the potential donor (47.5%; low eGFR, diabetes mellitus, impaired glucose tolerance, high blood pressure, cardiovascular pathology casually found during evaluation, and proteinuria). Of the discarded candidates from 2012 to 2013, 36.8% received a deceased donor kidney transplant, 17% a LDKT with another donor, 7.5% stayed on the waiting list, 18.9% died, 3.8% were excluded from the waiting list, and 14.2% were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In most cases, transplantation was not undertaken because of donor pathology. Fifty-three percent of the discarded patients were eventually transplanted, with a 31.4% probability to receive an organ from another living donor.
