Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc ; 16(6): 1018-26, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20630120

ABSTRACT

Confabulation has been documented in schizophrenia, but its neuropsychological correlates appear to be different from those of confabulation in neurological disease states. Forty-five schizophrenic patients and 37 controls were administered a task requiring them to recall fables. They also underwent testing with a range of memory and executive tasks. The patients with schizophrenia produced significantly more confabulations than the controls. After correcting for multiple comparisons, confabulation was not significantly associated with memory impairment, and was associated with impairment on only one of eight executive measures, the Brixton Test. Confabulation scores were also associated with impairment on two semantic memory tests. Confabulation was correlated with intrusion errors in recall, but not false positive errors in a recognition task. The findings suggest that confabulation in schizophrenia is unrelated to the episodic memory impairment seen in the disorder. However, the association with a circumscribed deficit in executive function could be consistent with a defective strategic retrieval account of confabulation similar to that of Moscovitch and co-workers, interacting with defective semantic memory.


Subject(s)
Confusion/complications , Confusion/diagnosis , Memory Disorders/complications , Memory Disorders/diagnosis , Neuropsychological Tests , Adult , Confusion/etiology , Executive Function/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Memory Disorders/etiology , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Schizophrenia/complications , Semantics , Statistics as Topic , Verbal Learning
2.
Bipolar Disord ; 10(3): 400-12, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18402628

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) is an instrument for the detection of patients with bipolar disorder (BD). The original English version is validated in both the psychiatric and the general population, but a validated Spanish version is not yet available. Psychometric properties of the Spanish adaptation of the MDQ in psychiatry are described. METHODS: The MDQ is a self-administered questionnaire comprising a list of 13 hypomanic symptoms and two questions about concurrence of symptoms and functional impairment caused by the symptoms. We selected patients from 15 psychiatric outpatient departments, diagnosed with BD type I and II (BDI and BDII) and major depression (MD) according to DSM-IV-TR criteria (concurrent validity instrument). A control group of healthy subjects (HS) was selected. The patient-selection criteria included stability of the disorder and pharmacological treatment. The MDQ was administered to 236 subjects, distributed among the four groups, on two occasions, four weeks apart. We analysed the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and discriminative capacity of the MDQ for the detection of patients with BD. RESULTS: Concurrent validity based on diagnosis according to DSM-IV-TR was 0.83. The internal consistency, evaluated by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.90. The mean (SD) number of affirmative responses by group was: 9.8 (2.4) for BDI, 8.5 (2.8) for BDII, 2.7 (2.2) for MD, and 1.02 (1.9) for HS. Statistically significant differences between all the groups were found (Kruskal-Wallis test, p < 0.001). Concurrent validity using the diagnostic variable was 0.83. Test-retest reliability was 0.92. We analysed the scale's discriminative capacity, revealing a sensitivity value of 0.60 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.51-0.69] and a specificity value of 0.98 (95% CI = 0.94-0.99) in the detection of BD. The positive and negative probability ratios were 35.5 and 2.4, respectively. If we consider only seven positive responses as the discriminative criterion, sensitivity increases to 0.81 (95% CI = 0.73-0.88), the specificity value is 0.95 (95% CI = 0.89-0.98) and the positive and negative probability quotients are 16 and 5.3. CONCLUSIONS: The psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version are similar to those of the original version. In the Spanish adaptation of the MDQ, seven positive responses to hypomanic symptoms show a good discriminative capacity for BD in patients attending psychiatric outpatient facilities; therefore, this cut-off score is proposed for the detection of BD in psychiatric outpatients.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Translations , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bipolar Disorder/classification , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Humans , Middle Aged , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spain/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...