Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis in a general population cohort from Argentina.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: South America is one of the regions with the highest rates of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). This study aimed to assess the prevalence and severity of NAFLD in suburban Argentina. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study involved a general community cohort of 993 subjects evaluated sequentially with a comprehensive lifestyle questionnaire, laboratory testing, abdominal ultrasound (US) and transient elastography with XL probe. NAFLD was diagnosed according to standard criteria. RESULTS: The prevalence of NAFLD by the US was 37.2% (326/875) overall, 50.3% in subjects with overweight/obesity, 58.6% with hypertriglyceridemia, 62.3% with diabetes/hyperglycemia and 72.1% with all three risk factors. Male gender (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.03-1.47, p = 0.029), age (50-59 years: OR 1.98, 95 CI 1.16-3.39, p = 0.013 and ≥60 years: OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.13-3.09, p = 0.015), BMI (25-29: OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.86-4.51, p<0.001 and ≥30: OR 9.57, 95% CI 6.14-15.20, p<0.001), diabetes/hyperglycemia (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.05-2.61, p = 0.029) and hypertriglyceridemia (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.20-2.48, p = 0.002) were independent predictors of NAFLD. Among patients with steatosis, 22.2% (69/311) had ≥F2 fibrosis (overweight 25%, hypertriglyceridemia 32%, diabetes/hyperglycemia 34%). BMI (OR 5.22, 95% CI 2.64-11.74, p<0.001), diabetes/hyperglycemia (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.05-4.29, p = 0.04) and hypertriglyceridemia (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.03-3.68, p = 0.040) were independent predictors of liver fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: This general population study from Argentina showed a high prevalence of NAFLD. Significant liver fibrosis was present in 22% of subjects with NAFLD. This information adds to the existing knowledge of NAFLD epidemiology in Latin America.

What is the optimal antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent postoperative infectious complications after liver transplantation? A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial prophylaxis is well-accepted in the liver transplant (LT) setting. Nevertheless, optimal regimens to prevent bacterial, viral, and fungal infections are not defined. OBJECTIVES: To identify the optimal antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent post-LT bacterial, fungal, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections, to improve short-term outcomes, and to provide international expert panel recommendations. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central. METHODS: Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel. PROSPERO ID: CRD42021244976. RESULTS: Of 1853 studies screened, 34 were included for this review. Bacterial, CMV, and fungal antimicrobial prophylaxis were evaluated separately. Pneumocystis jiroveccii pneumonia (PJP) antimicrobial prophylaxis was analyzed separately from other fungal infections. Overall, eight randomized controlled trials, 21 comparative studies, and five observational noncomparative studies were included. CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial prophylaxis is recommended to prevent bacterial, CMV, and fungal infection to improve outcomes after LT. Universal antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended to prevent postoperative bacterial infections. The choice of antibiotics should be individualized and length of therapy should not exceed 24 hours (Quality of Evidence; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong). Both universal prophylaxis and preemptive therapy are strongly recommended for CMV prevention following LT. The choice of one or the other strategy will depend on individual program resources and experiences, as well as donor and recipient serostatus. (Quality of Evidence; Low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong). Antifungal prophylaxis is strongly recommended for LT recipients at high risk of developing invasive fungal infections. The drug of choice remains controversial. (Quality of Evidence; High | Grade of Recommendation; Strong). PJP prophylaxis is strongly recommended. Length of prophylaxis remains controversial. (Quality of Evidence; Very Low | Grade of Recommendation; Strong).

Twenty-year follow-up of an outbreak of hepatitis C in a small rural town of Argentina: The O'Brien Project.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: In 1999, a population-based survey showed a 5.6 % (102/1832) prevalence of HCV infection in O'Brien, a small rural town of Argentina. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of screening, clinical evaluation and antiviral therapy on elimination of HCV after 20 years of follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HCV+ subjects (n=102) underwent clinical, biochemical and histological evaluation to assess the presence and severity of liver disease. Antiviral therapy included pegylated interferon + ribavirin in 2005 and direct antiviral agents from 2017. RESULTS: All viremic subjects (n=84) had genotype 1b with 90%-97.5% sequence homology scores, suggesting the existence of a common source of infection (use of unsafe injections administered by the same health professional). Liver biopsy (n=55) showed chronic hepatitis in all patients. The prevalence of cirrhosis was 28% overall (29/102) and 34.5% among viremic patients. Sustained virological response (SVR) was obtained in 20/34 (59%) patients treated with interferon. From 2005 to 2017, when oral antivirals became available 37/50 untreated patients died. Median age of this group in 2005 was 67 years. Six interferon non-responders and five naive subjects received direct antiviral agents and all developed SVR. Only 1/31 patient (3.2%) with SVR died and none developed decompensated cirrhosis or HCC. In 2019, a new population-based study showed that the prevalence of HCV in O'Brien decreased 20-fold, from 5.6% to 0.28% (3/1070). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high mortality rate precluding timely access to direct antiviral agents, the O'Brien Project is a good example of HCV micro-elimination studies.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: impact of expansion criteria in a multicenter cohort study from a high waitlist mortality region.

This study aimed to compare liver transplantation (LT) outcomes and evaluate the potential rise in numbers of LT candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of different allocation policies in a high waitlist mortality region. Three policies were applied in two Latin American cohorts (1085 HCC transplanted patients and 917 listed patients for HCC): (i) Milan criteria with expansion according to UCSF downstaging (UCSF-DS), (ii) the AFP score, and (iii) restrictive policy or Double Eligibility Criteria (DEC; within Milan + AFP score ≤2). Increase in HCC patient numbers was evaluated in an Argentinian prospective validation set (INCUCAI; NCT03775863). Expansion criteria in policy A showed that UCSF-DS [28.4% (CI 12.8-56.2)] or "all-comers" [32.9% (CI 11.9-71.3)] had higher 5-year recurrence rates compared to Milan, with 10.9% increase in HCC patients for LT. The policy B showed lower recurrence rates for AFP scores ≤2 points, even expanding beyond Milan criteria, with a 3.3% increase. Patients within DEC had lower 5-year recurrence rates compared with those beyond DEC [13.3% (CI 10.1-17.3) vs 24.2% (CI 17.4-33.1; P = 0.0006], without significant HCC expansion. In conclusion, although the application of a stricter policy may optimize the selection process, this restrictive policy may lead to ethical concerns in organ allocation (NCT03775863).

Argentinian clinical practice guideline for surveillance, diagnosis, staging and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

The A.A.E.E.H has developed this guideline for the best care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from Argentina. It was done from May 2018 to March 2020. Specific clinical research questions were systematically searched. The quality of evidence and level of recommendations were organized according to GRADE. HCC surveillance is strongly recommended with abdominal ultrasound (US) every six months in the population at risk for HCC (cirrhosis, hepatitis B or hepatitis C); it is suggested to add alpha-feto protein (AFP) levels in case of inexeperienced sonographers. Imaging diagnosis in patients at risk for HCC has high specificity and tumor biopsy is not mandatory. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer algorithm is strongly recommended for HCC staging and treatment-decision processes. Liver resection is strongly recommended for patients without portal hypertension and preserved liver function. Composite models are suggested for liver transplant selection criteria. Therapies for HCC with robust clinical evidence include transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and first to second line systemic treatment options (sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, cabozantinib and ramucirumab). Immunotherapy with nivolumab and pembrolizumab has failed to show statistical benefit but the novel combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has recently shown survival benefit over sorafenib in frontline.

Liver transplantation in adults with acute liver failure: Outcomes from the Argentinean Transplant Registry.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Liver transplantation (LT) for acute liver failure (ALF) still has a high early mortality. We aimed to evaluate changes occurring in recent years and identify risk factors for poor outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively obtained from the Argentinean Transplant Registry from two time periods (1998-2005 and 2006-2016). We used survival analysis to evaluate risk of death. RESULTS: A total of 561 patients were listed for LT (69% female, mean age 39.5±16.4 years). Between early and later periods there was a reduction in wait-list mortality from 27% to 19% (p<0.02) and 1-month post-LT survival rates improved from 70% to 82% (p<0.01). Overall, 61% of the patients underwent LT and 22% died on the waiting list. Among those undergoing LT, Cox regression analysis identified prolonged cold ischemia time (HR 1.18 [1.02-1.36] and serum creatinine (HR 1.31 [1.01-1.71]) as independent risk factors of death post-LT. Etiologies of ALF were only available in the later period (N=363) with indeterminate and autoimmune hepatitis accounting for 28% and 26% of the cases, respectively. After adjusting for age, gender, private/public hospital, INR, creatinine and bilirubin, and considering LT as the competing event, indeterminate etiology was significantly associated with death (SHR 1.63 [1.06-2.51] and autoimmune hepatitis presented a trend to improved survival (SHR 0.61 [0.36-1.05]). CONCLUSIONS: Survival of patients with ALF on the waiting list and after LT has significantly improved in recent years. Indeterminate cause and autoimmune hepatitis were the most frequent etiologies of ALF in Argentina and were associated with mortality.

Calibración y validación de la Razón Internacional Normatizada (RIN) en pacientes cirróticos / Calibration and Validation of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) in Cirrhotic Patients

El MELD es un modelo pronóstico de score matemático usado para priorizar los pacientes en lista de espera para trasplante hepático, incluye resultados de creatinina, bilirrubina y tiempo de protrombina expresado como RIN. La disparidad en el score MELD como resultado de la variabilidad interlaboratorio de los componentes de la formula nos lleva a cuestionar la validez del mismo como herramienta de medición objetiva para la locación del órgano. El motivo de utilizar el MELD se basa en la presunción que el score debería ser igual en distintos lugares, si los métodos utilizados para medir las distintas variables llegaran al mismo resultado numérico. La evidencia muestra que la metodología utilizada para las mediciones puede influenciar en el cálculo del MELD identificando al RIN como la variable más importante. Esta variabilidad está dada por la distinta procedencia biológica de las tromboplastinas y de su ISI el cual refleja la capacidad de respuesta de la tromboplastina a la disminución de los factores de coagulación dependientes de la vitamina k. El RIN estandariza el tiempo de protrombina durante la anticoagulación oral, su uso se extendió para estandarizar el tiempo de protrombina en la enfermedad hepática y se incluyó en los modelos pronósticos como el MELD. Sin embrago los mecanismos de prolongación del tiempo de protrombina en la enfermedad hepática difieren de aquellos implicados en la anticoagulación oral y las tromboplastinas difieren en su sensibilidad para detectar las variaciones en los diferentes mecanismos. Tripodi y Velez han propuesto que los valores de ISI para las distintas tromboplastinas deberían ser calculados con plasmas de pacientes cirróticos y así calcular el RIN hepático lo que resolvería la variabilidad relacionada al RIN en el cálculo del MELD.

MELD is a prognostic model from amathematical score used to prioritize patients on a waiting list for liver transplantation and includes creatinine, bilirubin and prothrombin time expressed as an INR. The disparity in the MELD score, as a result of interlaboratory variability of the formula components, has lead us to question its validity as an objective measuring tool to localize the organ. The reason to use the MELD is based on the assumption that the score should be the same through different places, if methods used to measure the different variables reached the same numerical results. The evidence shows that the methods used in measuring can affect the MELD assessment by identifying the INR as the most important variable. This variability is caused by the different biological origin of the thromboplastins and their ISI, which reflects the thromboplastin's capacity of response to the decrease of vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors. The INR standardizes the prothrombin time during oral coagulation; its use was extended to standardize the prothrombin time in liver disease and was included in prognostic models like MELD. However, the mechanisms to extend the prothrombin time in liver disease are different from those involved in oral anticoagulation and the sensitivity of thromboplastins differ when detecting the variations in the different mechanisms. Tripodi and Velez have proposed that the ISI values for the different thromboplastins should be calculated on the basis of plasma from cirrhotic patients and thus the liver IRN should be calculated as well, which would resolve the variability associated to the IRN in calculating the MELD.

Hepatitis C virus infection in Argentina: Burden of chronic disease.

AIM: To estimate the progression of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemic and measure the burden of HCV-related morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Age- and gender-defined cohorts were used to follow the viremic population in Argentina and estimate HCV incidence, prevalence, hepatic complications, and mortality. The relative impact of two scenarios on HCV-related outcomes was assessed: (1) increased sustained virologic response (SVR); and (2) increased SVR and treatment. RESULTS: Under scenario 1, SVR raised to 85%-95% in 2016. Compared to the base case scenario, there was a 0.3% reduction in prevalent cases and liver-related deaths by 2030. Given low treatment rates, cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and decompensated cirrhosis decreased < 1%, in contrast to the base case in 2030. Under scenario 2, the same increases in SVR were modeled, with gradual increases in the annual diagnosed and treated populations. This scenario decreased prevalent infections 45%, liver-related deaths 55%, liver cancer cases 60%, and decompensated cirrhosis 55%, as compared to the base case by 2030. CONCLUSION: In Argentina, cases of end stage liver disease and liver-related deaths due to HCV are still growing, while its prevalence is decreasing. Increasing in SVR rates is not enough, and increasing in the number of patients diagnosed and candidates for treatment is needed to reduce the HCV disease burden. Based on this scenario, strategies to increase diagnosis and treatment uptake must be developed to reduce HCV burden in Argentina.

Combinational Effect of CYP3A5 and MDR-1 Polymorphisms on Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics in Liver Transplant Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have reported reduced tacrolimus dose-adjusted exposure in individuals expressing the CYP3A5*1 allele (reference single nucleotide polymorphism identification number 776746). However, results on patients from South America are scarce. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of CYP3A5 and MDR1 allelic variants and their correlation on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus and a modified release formulation of tacrolimus in stable patients with liver transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, single center, open-label study. Included patients were ≥ 18 years old and receiving a stable dose of tacrolimus for at least 6 months. Patients receiving stable treatment of twice daily tacrolimus were switched to a once-daily dose of modified release tacrolimus, on a milligram-to-milligram basis, with the modified release formulation administered for at least 4 weeks. Blood levels of tacrolimus were obtained before and 1 month after treatment was switched to the modified release formulation. RESULTS: The frequency of the intron 3 allelic variant of the CYP3A5 isoform (G-to-A substitution at nucleotide 6986) in recipients was 16.6% and 25% in donors. Dose levels of tacrolimus and the modified formulation were significantly higher in donors and recipients who expressed CYP3A5 versus donors and recipients who did not express this allele. In addition, patients who received a liver from a donor expressing CYP3A5 had significantly lower trough concentrations of tacrolimus and the modified formulation. CYP3A5 expression in the donor liver affected tacrolimus (40.46%, P = .001) and modified formulation (37.56%, P = .001) variability. No association was found between the ABCB1 genotype and levels of tacrolimus or its modified formulation. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that CYP3A5*1 in either the donor or recipient resulted in higher mean daily doses of tacrolimus or its modified formulation to achieve target drug exposure in liver transplant patients.

Sustained virological response to antiviral therapy in a randomized trial of cyclosporine versus tacrolimus in liver transplant patients with recurrent hepatitis C infection.

BACKGROUND: Choice of calcineurin inhibitor may influence response to antiviral therapy in liver transplant patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a randomized, multicenter, 80-week trial, liver transplant recipients (>6 months and £10 years post-transplant) with recurrent HCV infection received cyclosporine (n=50) or tacrolimus (n=42) with a 48-week course of pegylated interferon (peg-IFNα2a) and ribavirin. Twenty-three patients in each group completed the trial on study medication. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR) 24 weeks after the end of antiviral therapy, for which 43 patients were eligible for analysis. RESULTS: The rate of SVR was 60.0% (12/20) with cyclosporine and 43.5% (10/23) with tacrolimus (adjusted odds ratio 1.85; 95% CI 0.53-6.43; p=0.331). There were no significant intergroup differences for rapid or early virological response, relapse, HCV RNA viral load, or fibrosis progression. One cyclosporine-treated patient experienced acute rejection. One patient died in each group. Adverse events, treatment-related adverse events, and serious adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Since fewer patients were recruited than planned (92 versus 355), the study was underpowered and robust conclusions cannot be drawn regarding the effect of cyclosporine and tacrolimus on virological responses to antiviral treatment for recurrent HCV after liver transplantation. However, as reported in other trials, SVR was higher in cyclosporine-treated patients.

Donor selection criteria for liver transplantation in Argentina: are current standards too rigorous?

Organ shortage is the major limitation for the growth of deceased donor liver transplant worldwide. One strategy to ameliorate this problem is to maximize the liver utilization rate. To assess predictors of liver utilization in Argentina. The national database was used to analyze transplant activity in 2010. Donor, recipient, and transplant variables were evaluated as predictors of graft utilization of number of rejected donor offers before grafting and with the occurrence of primary nonfunction (PNF) or early post-transplant mortality (EM). Of the 582 deceased donors, 293 (50.3%) were recovered for liver transplant. Variables associated with the nonrecovery of the liver were age ≥46 years, umbilical perimeter ≥92 cm, organ procurement outside Gran Buenos Aires, AST ≥42 U/l and ALT ≥29 U/l. The median number of rejected offers before grafting was 4, and in 71 patients (25%), there were ≥13. The only independent predictor for the occurrence of PNF (3.4%) or EM (5.2%) was the recipient's emergency status. During 2010 in Argentina, the liver was recovered in only half of donors. The low incidence of PNF and EM and the characteristics of the nonrecovered liver donors suggest that organ acceptance criteria should be less rigorous.

Results after the adoption of a MELD/PELD-based liver allocation policy in Argentina.

In July 2005, Argentina switched from a categorical liver allocation system to a MELD/PELD-based policy for patients with CLD. To analyze WL outcomes and survival after LT in children. From January 2000 to December 2010, 923 children were registered. Two consecutive five-yr periods were analyzed and compared: Era I (January 2000-July 2005) (n = 379) and Era II (July 2005-December 31, 2010) (n = 544). All data were prospectively collected and analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. After adopting the MELD/PELD system, WL registrations increased by 44% (from 379 to 544) and the number of LT increased by only 24% (from 278 to 365). However, three-month WL mortality rate (32% to 18%, p < 0.0001, HR 2.002 CI 95% 1.5-2.8) decreased significantly. No significant differences were observed between Era 1 and II in one-yr post-LT survival (77.5% vs. 84.1%, p = 0.3053) and in acute re-LT rate (9% vs. 5%, p = 0.1746). Under the MELD/PELD-based allocation system in Argentina, mortality on the WL significantly decreased in children with CLD without affecting post-LT survival, although reduced access to LT was observed.

Simeprevir versus telaprevir with peginterferon and ribavirin in previous null or partial responders with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection (ATTAIN): a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: We did a phase 3 study in previous non-responders with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection and compensated liver disease that related to the standard of care for these patients at the time this study was initiated. We investigated whether simeprevir is non-inferior in terms of efficacy to telaprevir, each in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin. METHODS: We did this randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial at 169 investigational sites in 24 countries. We enrolled adults (≥18 years) with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection, compensated liver disease, and plasma HCV RNA higher than 10 000 IU/mL who were null or partial responders during at least one previous course of peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin treatment. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients (stratified by HCV genotype 1 subtype [1a plus other/1b] and previous treatment response [partial or null]) to receive simeprevir (150 mg once a day) plus telaprevir placebo (three times a day 7-9 h apart) or telaprevir (750 mg three times a day) plus simeprevir placebo (once a day) in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 12 weeks followed by 36 weeks of peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin alone. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response 12 weeks after end of treatment (SVR12) in the intention-to-treat and the per-protocol population. We compared groups with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. We established a non-inferiority margin of 12%. Adverse events were reported descriptively. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01485991. FINDINGS: Patient screening began on Jan 19, 2012, and the last visit was on April 7, 2014. We included 763 patients (472 previous null responders [62%]). Simeprevir and peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin was non-inferior to telaprevir and peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for SVR12 (54% [203/379] vs 55% [210/384]; difference -1·1%, 95% CI -7·8 to 5·5; p=0·0007). SVR12 was achieved in 70% (101/145) versus 68% (100/146) of previous partial responders and 44% (102/234) versus 46% (110/238) of previous null responders with simeprevir and peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin and telaprevir and peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin treatment, respectively. We recorded differences between treatment groups in simeprevir or telaprevir-related adverse events (69% [261/379] in the simeprevir group vs 86% [330/384] in the telaprevir group), serious adverse events (2% [8/379] vs 9% [33/384]), and adverse events leading to simeprevir or telaprevir discontinuation (2% [7/379] vs 8% [32/384]). INTERPRETATION: Simeprevir once a day with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin was well tolerated in HCV genotype 1-infected previous non-responders and was non-inferior to telaprevir, thus providing an alternative treatment in areas of the world where all-oral HCV regimens are not available or accessible. FUNDING: Janssen.

Fibrosis progression in maintenance liver transplant patients with hepatitis C recurrence: a randomised study of everolimus vs. calcineurin inhibitors.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Robust clinical data evaluating fibrosis progression in hepatitis C virus (HCV) liver transplant patients receiving an mTOR inhibitor vs. calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) are lacking. To evaluate fibrosis progression in maintenance liver transplant patients receiving everolimus- or CNI-based immunosuppression. METHODS: In a randomised, multicentre, open-label study, 43 maintenance liver transplant patients with recurrent HCV infection were randomised to continue CNI-based immunosuppression or switch to everolimus. RESULTS: For patients with biopsy data at month 12, mean Ishak-Knodell fibrosis score at baseline was 2.6 ± 0.9 (n = 14) with everolimus vs. 1.9 ± 1.1 (n = 18) with CNI (P = 0.043), and 1.9 ± 1.2 vs. 2.2 ± 1.3 at month 12. Ishak-Knodell fibrosis score decreased from baseline to month 12 by a mean of -0.7 ± 1.1 with everolimus, but increased by 0.2 ± 1.2 with CNI (P = 0.046). No acute rejection or graft losses occurred up to month 12. Estimated GFR at month 12 was 65.6 ml/min/1.73 m² with everolimus and 62.2 ml/min/1.73 m² with CNI [mean difference 3.4 ml/min/1.73 m² compared to CNI control group, 95% CI -4.9, 11.8 ml/min/1.73 m², P = 0.411 (analysis of covariance adjusting for baseline GFR)]. Adverse events occurred in 95.5% of everolimus patients and 71.4% of CNI patients (serious adverse events 31.8% and 0.0%, respectively). Adverse events led to everolimus discontinuation in five patients (22.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory study suggests that conversion from CNI to everolimus reduces progression of liver fibrosis, and preserves renal function without jeopardising efficacy in liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV, but is associated with a higher incidence of adverse events and serious adverse events. These preliminary findings merit examination in a larger trial.

Simeprevir with pegylated interferon alfa 2a or 2b plus ribavirin in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection (QUEST-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Pegylated interferon (peginterferon) alfa 2a or 2b plus ribavirin regimens were the standard of care in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but the sustained virological response can be suboptimum in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the combination of simeprevir, a one-pill, once-daily, oral HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor versus placebo, plus peginterferon alfa 2a or 2b plus ribavirin was assessed in treatment-naive patients with HCV genotype 1 infection. METHODS: In the QUEST-2, phase 3 study, done at 76 sites in 14 countries (Europe, and North and South Americas), patients with confirmed chronic HCV genotype 1 infection and no history of HCV treatment were randomly assigned with a computer-generated allocation sequence in a ratio of 2:1 and stratified by HCV genotype 1 subtype and host IL28B genotype to receive simeprevir (150 mg once daily, orally), peginterferon alfa 2a (180 µg once weekly, subcutaneous injection) or 2b (according to bodyweight; 50 µg, 80 µg, 100 µg, 120 µg, or 150 µg once weekly, subcutaneous injection), plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day or 800-1400 mg/day, orally; simeprevir group) or placebo (once daily, orally), peginterferon alfa 2a or 2b, plus ribavirin (placebo group) for 12 weeks, followed by just peginterferon alfa 2a or 2b plus ribavirin. Total treatment duration was 24 weeks or 48 weeks (simeprevir group) based on criteria for response-guided therapy (ie, HCV RNA <25 IU/mL undetectable or detectable at week 4 and undetectable week 12) or 48 weeks (placebo). Patients, study personnel, and the sponsor were masked to treatment assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response at 12 weeks after the planned end of treatment (SVR12). Analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01290679. Results from the primary (SVR12, week 60) analysis are presented. FINDINGS: 209 (81%) of 257 patients in the simeprevir group and 67 (50%) of 134 in the placebo group had SVR12 (adjusted difference 32·2%, 95% CI 23·3-41·2; p<0·0001). The incidences of adverse events were similar in the simeprevir and placebo groups at 12 weeks (246 [96%] vs 130 [97%]) and for the entire treatment (249 [97%] vs 132 [99%]), irrespective of the peginterferon alfa used. The most common adverse events were headache, fatigue, pyrexia, and influenza-like illness at 12 weeks (95 [37%) vs 45 [34%], 89 [35%] vs 52 [39%], 78 [30%] vs 48 [36%], and 66 [26%] vs 34 [25%], respectively) and for the entire treatment (100 [39%] vs 49 [37%], 94 [37%] vs 56 [42%], 79 [31%] vs 53 [40%], and 66 [26%] vs 35 [26%], respectively). Rash and photosensitivity frequencies were higher in the simeprevir group than in the placebo group (61 [24%] vs 15 [11%] and ten [4%] vs one [<1%], respectively). There was no difference in the prevalence of anaemia between the simeprevir and placebo groups (35 [14%] vs 21 [16%], respectively, at 12 weeks, and 53 [21%] vs 37 [28%], respectively, during the entire treatment). INTERPRETATION: Addition of simeprevir to either peginterferon alfa 2a or peginterferon alfa 2b plus ribavirin improved SVR in treatment-naive patients with HCV genotype 1 infection, without worsening the known adverse events associated with peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin. FUNDING: Janssen Infectious Diseases-Diagnostics.

Improved waiting-list outcomes in Argentina after the adoption of a model for end-stage liver disease-based liver allocation policy.

In July 2005, Argentina became the first country after the United States to introduce the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) for organ allocation. In this study, we investigated waiting-list (WL) outcomes (n = 3272) and post-liver transplantation (LT) survival in 2 consecutive periods of 5 years before and after the implementation of a MELD-based allocation policy. Data were obtained from the database of the national institute for organ allocation in Argentina. After the adoption of the MELD system, there were significant reductions in WL mortality [28.5% versus 21.9%, P < 0.001, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.37-1.81] and total dropout rates (38.6% versus 29.1%, P < 0.001, HR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.16-1.48) despite significantly less LT accessibility (57.4% versus 50.7%, P < 0.001, HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.39-1.68). The annual number of deaths per 1000 patient-years at risk decreased from 273 in 2005 to 173 in 2010, and the number of LT procedures per 1000 patient-years at risk decreased from 564 to 422. MELD and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium scores were excellent predictors of 3-month WL mortality with c statistics of 0.828 and 0.857, respectively (P < 0.001). No difference was observed in 1-year posttransplant survival between the 2 periods (81.1% versus 81.3%). Although patients with a MELD score > 30 had lower posttransplant survival, the global accuracy of the score for predicting outcomes was poor, as indicated by a c statistic of only 0.523. Patients with granted MELD exceptions (158 for hepatocellular carcinoma and 52 for other reasons) had significantly higher access to LT (80.4%) in comparison with nonexception patients with equivalent listing priority (MELD score = 18-25; 54.6%, P < 0.001, HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.40-0.61). In conclusion, the adoption of the MELD model in Argentina has resulted in improved liver organ allocation without compromising posttransplant survival.