Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
2.
Anaesthesia ; 75(2): 162-170, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31270799

ABSTRACT

NHS England recently mandated that the National Early Warning Score of vital signs be used in all acute hospital trusts in the UK despite limited validation in the postoperative setting. We undertook a multicentre UK study of 13,631 patients discharged from intensive care after risk-stratified cardiac surgery in four centres, all of which used VitalPACTM to electronically collect postoperative National Early Warning Score vital signs. We analysed 540,127 sets of vital signs to generate a logistic score, the discrimination of which we compared with the national additive score for the composite outcome of: in-hospital death; cardiac arrest; or unplanned intensive care admission. There were 578 patients (4.2%) with an outcome that followed 4300 sets of observations (0.8%) in the preceding 24 h: 499 out of 578 (86%) patients had unplanned re-admissions to intensive care. Discrimination by the logistic score was significantly better than the additive score. Respective areas (95%CI) under the receiver-operating characteristic curve with 24-h and 6-h vital signs were: 0.779 (0.771-0.786) vs. 0.754 (0.746-0.761), p < 0.001; and 0.841 (0.829-0.853) vs. 0.813 (0.800-0.825), p < 0.001, respectively. Our proposed logistic Early Warning Score was better than the current National Early Warning Score at discriminating patients who had an event after cardiac surgery from those who did not.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/mortality , Early Warning Score , Heart Arrest/diagnosis , Intensive Care Units , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , United Kingdom
3.
Anaesthesia ; 74(10): 1282-1289, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31273760

ABSTRACT

The measurement of extravascular lung water is a relatively new technology which has not yet been well validated as a clinically useful tool. We studied its utility in patients undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy as they frequently suffer reperfusion lung injury and associated oedematous lungs. Such patients are therefore ideal for evaluating this new monitor. We performed a prospective observational cohort study during which extravascular lung water index measurements were taken before and immediately after surgery and postoperatively in intensive care. Data were analysed for 57 patients; 21 patients (37%) experienced severe reperfusion lung injury. The first extravascular lung water index measurement after cardiopulmonary bypass failed to predict severe reperfusion lung injury, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.59 (95%CI 0.44-0.74). On intensive care, extravascular lung water index correlated most strongly at 36 h, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.90 (95%CI 0.80-1.00). Peri-operative extravascular lung water index is not a useful measure to predict severe reperfusion lung injury after pulmonary endarterectomy, however, it does allow monitoring and measurement during the postoperative period. This study implies that extravascular lung water index can be used to directly assess pulmonary fluid overload and that monitoring patients by measuring extravascular lung water index during their intensive care stay is useful and correlates with their clinical course. This may allow directed, pre-empted therapy to attenuate the effects and improve patient outcomes and should prompt further studies.


Subject(s)
Endarterectomy/adverse effects , Extravascular Lung Water , Lung Injury/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Pulmonary Artery/surgery , Reperfusion Injury/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Edema/diagnosis , Pulmonary Edema/etiology , ROC Curve , Thermodilution
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...