Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Rev. mex. ing. bioméd ; 38(1): 363-371, ene.-abr. 2017. graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-902355

ABSTRACT

Resumen: Objetivo: Analizar los espectros de absorción neta de las películas radiocrómicas EBT2 y EBT3 para describir su influencia en el comportamiento de las curvas de dosis-respuesta. Metodología: Las películas se irradiaron en un acelerador lineal de 6 MV. La obtención de los espectros de absorción neta se realizó con espectrofotómetro UV/VIS. Las curvas de dosis-respuesta se obtuvieron con un escáner, un láser He-Ne y un espectrofotómetro. Resultados: El espectro de absorción de las EBT2 muestra tres bandas de absorción centradas que conservan la posición y aumentan su intensidad en función de la dosis, sin embargo, este comportamiento no se observa en las películas EBT3. La curva dosis-respuesta muestra la máxima sensibilidad utilizando el espectrofotómetro, pero no muestra un comportamiento definido. Implicaciones: Generación de nuevos conocimientos para la creación de nuevos sistemas ópticos capaces de amplificar la sensibilidad de la respuesta de las películas. Originalidad: Mostrar la correlación entre los espectros de absorción neta y su influencia en las curvas dosis-respuesta en tres diferentes sistemas ópticos. Conclusiones: El comportamiento de los espectros de absorción aunado al comportamiento de las curvas dosis-respuesta nos ayuda a descartar el uso de sistemas ópticos que no garanticen un uso clínico confiable.


Abstract: Objective: To analyze the net absorption spectra of EBT2 and EBT3 radiochromic films to describe their influence on the behavior of dose-response curves. Methodology: The films were irradiated in a linear accelerator of 6 MV. The net absorption spectra were obtained with a UV / VIS spectrophotometer. Dose-response curves were obtained with a scanner, a He-Ne laser and a spectrophotometer. Results: The absorption spectrum of the EBT2 shows three focused absorption bands that retain position and increase their intensity as a function of dose, however, this behavior is not observed in EBT3 films. The dose-response curve shows maximum sensitivity using the spectrophotometer, but does not show a defined behavior. Implications: Generation of new knowledge for the creation of new optical systems capable of amplifying the responsiveness of the films. Originality: Show the correlation between net absorption spectra and their influence on dose-response curves in three different optical systems. Conclusions: The behavior of absorption spectra combined with the behavior of the dose-response curves helps to discard the use of optical systems that do not guarantee a reliable clinical use.

2.
Med Phys ; 39(7Part2): 4621, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28516552

ABSTRACT

In a previous study, the variogram fractal dimension (FD) method was found to be very accurate at identifying planned head and neck IMRT fields that are overly-modulated. In the current study, the authors used MATLAB® to develop FracMod, a graphical user interface (GUI) and variogram FD analysis tool to assess modulation complexity of dynamic IMRT fields designed for treatments of the prostate alone and prostate plus pelvic nodes. A set of 5 prostate plans (25 fields) and 5 prostate plus pelvic node plans (35 fields) were used to choose FD cut-points that ensure no false positives (100% specificity) in distinguishing between moderate field modulation (typical modulation used clinically at the authors' institution) and high modulation. Field modulation was controlled by adjusting fluence smoothing parameters in the Eclipse™ treatment planning system. The area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to quantitatively compare the ability of FD and the number of monitor units (MUs) for distinguishing between the moderate and high modulation fields. The variogram FD method gave AUCs of 0.96 (almost perfect classification) and 1.00 (perfect classification) for the prostate alone and the prostate plus pelvic node fields, respectively. The variogram FD method is an accurate metric; performing better than the number of MUs at identifying high modulation IMRT fields planned for the treatment of prostatic carcinoma. Hence, FracMod will enable Radiotherapy Physicists to easily and accurately quantify the degree of modulation of IMRT fields and adjust overly-modulated fields at the treatment planning stage.

3.
Med Phys ; 32(11): 3286-94, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16370417

ABSTRACT

The Final Aperture Superposition Technique (FAST) is described and applied to accurate, near instantaneous calculation of the relative output factor (ROF) and central axis percentage depth dose curve (PDD) for clinical electron beams used in radiotherapy. FAST is based on precalculation of dose at select points for the two extreme situations of a fully open final aperture and a final aperture with no opening (fully shielded). This technique is different than conventional superposition of dose deposition kernels: The precalculated dose is differential in position of the electron or photon at the downstream surface of the insert. The calculation for a particular aperture (x-ray jaws or MLC, insert in electron applicator) is done with superposition of the precalculated dose data, using the open field data over the open part of the aperture and the fully shielded data over the remainder. The calculation takes explicit account of all interactions in the shielded region of the aperture except the collimator effect: Particles that pass from the open part into the shielded part, or visa versa. For the clinical demonstration, FAST was compared to full Monte Carlo simulation of 10 x 10, 2.5 x 2.5, and 2 x 8 cm2 inserts. Dose was calculated to 0.5% precision in 0.4 x 0.4 x 0.2 cm3 voxels, spaced at 0.2 cm depth intervals along the central axis, using detailed Monte Carlo simulation of the treatment head of a commercial linear accelerator for six different electron beams with energies of 6-21 MeV. Each simulation took several hours on a personal computer with a 1.7 Mhz processor. The calculation for the individual inserts, done with superposition, was completed in under a second on the same PC. Since simulations for the pre calculation are only performed once, higher precision and resolution can be obtained without increasing the calculation time for individual inserts. Fully shielded contributions were largest for small fields and high beam energy, at the surface, reaching a maximum of 5.6% at 21 MeV. Contributions from the collimator effect were largest for the large field size, high beam energy, and shallow depths, reaching a maximum of 4.7% at 21 MeV. Both shielding contributions and the collimator effect need to be taken into account to achieve an accuracy of 2%. FAST takes explicit account of the shielding contributions. With the collimator effect set to that of the largest field in the FAST calculation, the difference in dose on the central axis (product of ROF and PDD) between FAST and full simulation was generally under 2%. The maximum difference of 2.5% exceeded the statistical precision of the calculation by four standard deviations. This occurred at 18 MeV for the 2.5 x 2.5 cm2 field. The differences are due to the method used to account for the collimator effect.


Subject(s)
Electrons , Radiometry/methods , Algorithms , Computer Simulation , Computers , Mathematical Computing , Monte Carlo Method , Particle Accelerators , Phantoms, Imaging , Photons , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Radiotherapy, Computer-Assisted , Radiotherapy, Conformal , Radiotherapy, High-Energy , Reproducibility of Results , Scattering, Radiation , Time Factors , X-Rays
4.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 104(2): 113-9, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12918788

ABSTRACT

A benchmark set of measured beta particle spectra for a standardised 60Co hot particle source is presented. The spectra were obtained for conditions similar to those encountered in practical dosimetric applications. The measured spectra were compared with Monte Carlo calculations using the MCNP code. These comparisons provided information to guide the selection of the optimal set-up parameters of the code. Important differences were observed in the MCNP calculated spectra when ITS and the default indexing style algorithm were used. Overall the calculations using the default mode of MCNP version 4B provide the best agreement with the measured electron spectra.


Subject(s)
Cobalt Radioisotopes/analysis , Electrons , Linear Energy Transfer , Models, Biological , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiation Protection/methods , Radioisotopes/analysis , Radiometry/instrumentation , Body Burden , Calibration , Humans , Models, Statistical , Monte Carlo Method , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Power Plants , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Monitoring/standards , Radiation Protection/standards , Radiometry/standards , Relative Biological Effectiveness , Reproducibility of Results , Scattering, Radiation , Sensitivity and Specificity , Statistics as Topic
5.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 101(1-4): 449-51, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12382788

ABSTRACT

Measurements of absorbed dose at 5 cm depth in a 30 x 30 x 30 cm3 water phantom have been performed using three independent dosimetric techniques: Fricke, alanine and radiochromic dye film (GafChromic HD-810). The measurements were carried out in the secondary standard dosimetry laboratory at ININ Mexico using a collimated 60Co gamma source with a radiation field of 10 x 10 cm2 at the phantom front surface. The source to phantom distance was set at 100 cm. The reference absorbed dose at 5 cm depth in the water phantom was obtained using a 0.6 cm3 ionisation chamber. The absorbed dose to water for the test dosimetry techniques was around 100 Gy. The deviations of the dose obtained from these dosimetry techniques were within 4%. The reasons for these deviations are discussed.


Subject(s)
Alanine , Cobalt Radioisotopes/pharmacokinetics , Film Dosimetry/methods , Coloring Agents , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy/methods , Gamma Rays , Humans , Water
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...