Gene expression profiling in psoriatic scalp hair follicles: clobetasol propionate shampoo 0.05% normalizes psoriasis disease markers.

BACKGROUND: Clobetasol propionate shampoo is effective and safe in treatment of scalp psoriasis (SP). Gene expression profiling of psoriatic skin biopsies led to the identification of numerous disease-related genes. However, it remained unknown whether the gene expression profile of hair follicles of SP patients was also affected. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether psoriasis-related genes are differentially regulated in the hair follicles of SP patients and whether the modulation of these genes can be correlated with clinical severity scores. METHODS: A single arm, open study was conducted in three centres. SP patients received daily treatment with clobetasol propionate shampoo. At Baseline, Weeks 2 and 4, investigators assessed clinical severity parameters and collected scalp hair follicles in anagen phase. Total RNA extracted from hair follicles was used to determine the expression level of 44 genes, which were reported previously to be upregulated in the skin of psoriasis patients. RESULTS: RNA of good quality and sufficient quantity was obtained from hair follicles of psoriasis patients and healthy volunteers (HV). The expression level of 10 inflammation-related genes was significantly increased in psoriatic hair follicles. The patient's exploratory transcriptomic score, defined as the mean fold modulation of these 10 genes compared with HV, correlated with clinical severity scores. Clobetasol propionate shampoo was effective in decreasing both the exploratory transcriptomics and the clinical severity scores. CONCLUSION: Hair follicles of SP patients are affected by the inflammatory process. The change in the expression level of inflammation-related genes correlates with the severity of the disease.

A clinical study comparing methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy and surgery in small superficial basal cell carcinoma (8-20 mm), with a 12-month follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and cosmetic outcome (CO) of photodynamic therapy with topical methyl aminolevulinate (MAL-PDT) with simple excision surgery for superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC) over a 1-year period. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, controlled, open study, patients were treated at baseline either with MAL-PDT (two sessions, 7 days apart, repeated 3 months later if incomplete clinical response) or surgery (at baseline). Primary endpoints were clinical lesion response (CR) 3 months after last treatment and CO assessed by the investigator 12 months after last treatment. Secondary endpoints were CR at 12 months (i.e. recurrence) and CO assessed by the investigator at 3 and 6 months and by the patient at 3, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Overall, 196 patients were enrolled with 1.4 sBCC lesions on average per patient. Mean lesion count reduction at 3 months was 92.2% with MAL-PDT vs. 99.2% with surgery [per protocol (PP) population] confirming the non-inferiority hypothesis (95% confidence interval, -12.1, -1.9). A total of 92.2% lesions showed CR at 3 months with MAL-PDT vs. 99.2% with surgery (PP population). At 12 months, 9.3% lesions recurred with MAL-PDT and none with surgery. CO was statistically superior for MAL-PDT at all time points. At 12 months, 94.1% lesions treated with MAL-PDT had an excellent or good CO according to the investigator compared with 59.8% with surgery. This difference was confirmed with the patients' assessment. The proportion of excellent CO markedly improved with time with MAL-PDT unlike surgery. CONCLUSIONS: MAL-PDT offers a similarly high efficacy and a much better CO than simple excision surgery in the treatment of sBCC.

Multicentre intraindividual randomized trial of topical methyl aminolaevulinate-photodynamic therapy vs. cryotherapy for multiple actinic keratoses on the extremities.

BACKGROUND: Methyl aminolaevulinate-photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT) is an effective treatment in facial/scalp actinic keratosis (AK). OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare efficacy, safety, cosmetic outcome and patient preference of MAL-PDT vs. cryotherapy in patients with AK at other locations. METHODS: A multicentre, controlled, randomized, open, intraindividual, right-left comparison was performed. Patients with nonhyperkeratotic AK were treated once with MAL-PDT and cryotherapy on either side of the body. At week 12, lesions showing noncomplete response were retreated. The primary efficacy variable was the lesion response at week 24. Investigator's assessment of cosmetic outcome, patient's preference in terms of cosmetic outcome and a patient preference questionnaire were also analysed at week 24. RESULTS: In total, of 121 patients with 1343 lesions (98% located on the extremities and the remainder on the trunk and neck) were included. Both treatments provided a high mean percentage reduction in lesion count at week 24 with significantly higher efficacy for cryotherapy: 78% for MAL-PDT and 88% for cryotherapy (P=0.002, per protocol population). Investigator's assessment of cosmetic outcome was significantly better for MAL-PDT than cryotherapy (P<0.001), 79% of lesions having an excellent cosmetic outcome with MAL-PDT vs. 56% with cryotherapy at week 24. The cosmetic outcome achieved by MAL-PDT compared with cryotherapy was also preferred by patients (50% vs. 22%, respectively, P<0.001), and 59% of patients would prefer to have any new lesions treated with MAL-PDT compared with 25% with cryotherapy (P<0.001). Both treatment regimens were safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: MAL-PDT showed inferior efficacy for treatment of non-face/scalp AK compared with cryotherapy. However, both treatments showed high efficacy, and MAL-PDT conveyed the advantages of better cosmesis and higher patient preference.