Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
2.
Surg Endosc ; 22(6): 1477-81, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18027039

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: About one-third of patients with colorectal carcinoma present with acute colonic obstruction requiring emergency surgery. Current surgical options are intraoperative lavage and resection of the colonic segment involved with primary anastomosis, subtotal colectomy with primary anastomosis, colostomy followed by resection, and resection of the colonic segment involved with end colostomy (Hartmann's procedure) requiring a second operation to reconstruct the colon. These procedures present risks and a poor quality of life. Endoscopic colonic stent insertion can effectively decompress the obstructed colon, allowing bowel preparation and elective resection. METHODS: The authors present their experience managing 31 patients with obstructing colorectal cancer who underwent endoscopic colonic decompression with self-expanding metallic stents. A total of 16 patients were treated with open resection, and 6 underwent a laparoscopic resection. The remaining 9 patients were managed with endoscopic palliation and adjuvant therapy. Of the 31 patients, 17 were treated with postoperative chemotherapy. RESULTS: The mean interval between stenting and surgery was 11 days (range, 1-21 days). There was no intraoperative morbidity. The incidence of postoperative morbidity was 20% for open surgery and 0% for laparoscopic surgery. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 13 days for the open surgery group, and 7 days for the laparoscopic group (p = 0.003). The hospital mortality rate was 3.2%. Follow-up evaluation was completed for 96% of the patients. The minimum follow-up period was 15 months. All the patients in the palliative group died of disease, with a median survival of 3 months. Of the 22 surgically treated patients, 17 (77%) are alive at this writing. CONCLUSION: This initial experience shows that after successful endoscopic stenting of malignant colorectal obstruction, elective surgical resection can be performed safely. The presence of the endoluminal stent does not prevent a laparoscopic approach. The combined endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures are a less invasive alternative to the multistage open operations and offer a faster recovery.


Subject(s)
Colectomy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Intestinal Obstruction/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparotomy/methods , Acute Disease , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/complications , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Stents , Treatment Outcome
3.
Endoscopy ; 37(1): 48-51, 2005 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15657858

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The placement of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the procedure of choice for the long-term management of dysphagic patients with neurological disease or with trauma or tumors of the head and neck. It is not always possible to perform conventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in such patients due to stenosis and/or occlusion of the mouth or pharynx and/or partial or complete trismus. The aim of this study was to show whether transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) offers a feasible and effective alternative method for PEG placement in these selected patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PEG placement was required for 155 patients at our institution during a 27-month period. In 12 patients oral access of an endoscope into the esophagus was not possible. Unsedated transnasal EGD (T-EGD) was then performed using an ultrathin video gastroscope, which had a distal-end diameter of 5.9 mm. A 16-Fr polyurethane PEG tube with a conical, flexible, soft distal end and a collapsible bumper was used in all cases. The Gauderer-Ponsky pull technique was used for PEG placement. RESULTS: T-EGD and perendoscopic transnasal placement of a PEG tube was successfully performed in all 12 patients. No patient required sedation during the procedure. No immediate or late-onset procedure-related complications occurred in any of the 12 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In some dysphagic patients in whom the oral route is not accessible with a standard endoscope, a transnasal endoscopic approach allows the placement of a PEG tube. In these selected patients this technique has been shown to be safe and effective and does not require the use of sedation.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy, Digestive System , Enteral Nutrition , Gastroscopes , Gastrostomy/methods , Intubation, Gastrointestinal/methods , Video-Assisted Surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Feasibility Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Malnutrition/therapy , Middle Aged
4.
Lancet ; 356(9237): 1232-5, 2000 Oct 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11072942

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: No available therapy has, as yet, proven effective to treat acute radiation proctitis (ARP) following radiation therapy for malignant pelvic disease. We assessed whether sodium butyrate enemas, at a dose of 80 mmol/L (80 mL/24 h), might offer effective treatment for this condition. METHODS: 20 patients presenting with ARP after completing a cycle of 35-52 Gy external-beam radiation therapy for pelvic malignant disease, were treated for 3 weeks with topical sodium butyrate and saline enemas according to a randomised, double-blind, crossover protocol. Clinical, endoscopic, and histological findings were assessed at enrollment, at week 3, and then at the end of the study. Data were analysed by two-tailed t test for paired data (continuous variables) and a logistic-regression model with variable multiple response for ordered categorical data. FINDINGS: Topical butyrate, but not saline, led to remission of symptoms (clinical score from 8.2 [SE 1.6] to 1.5 [0.7] vs 7.9 [1.8] to 8.1 [3.4]). When the treatment regimen was switched, eight out of nine of the previously placebo-treated patients went into remission, whereas three patients relapsed when switched to saline. The advantage of butyrate over placebo, expressed as CI, odds ratio, and p value was significant for almost all the clinical, endoscopic and histological factors taken into consideration. INTERPRETATION: Topical sodium butyrate, unlike other therapeutic regimens used so far, proved effective in the treatment of ARP.


Subject(s)
Butyrates/therapeutic use , Proctitis/prevention & control , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Administration, Topical , Butyrates/administration & dosage , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Proctitis/etiology , Proctitis/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Injuries/radiotherapy , Rectum/drug effects , Rectum/pathology , Treatment Outcome
5.
Dig Dis Sci ; 45(5): 976-81, 2000 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10795763

ABSTRACT

Butyrate represents the main source of energy for colonic epithelial cells; however, its availability/utilization is impaired in ulcerative colitis (UC). In the present randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study, the safety and efficacy of colonic targeted oral sodium butyrate tablets, coated with a pH-dependent soluble polymer, have been evaluated in ulcerative colitis. Thirty patients with mild to moderate colitis underwent a six-week course of oral sodium butyrate (4 g/day) plus oral mesalazine (2.4 g/day), (Group A) or of oral mesalazine plus placebo (Group B). Clinical, endoscopic, and histologic data were collected at the beginning and the end of the study. Twenty-five patients completed the study (12 in group A, 13 in group B). No untoward side effects were reported. In group A, seven patients underwent remission and four improved; in Group B the numbers were 5 and 5, respectively. After treatment, all clinical parameters had significantly improved in both treatment arms compared to pretreatment findings. The UC disease activity index (UCDAI) score decreased from 7.27 +/- 2.02 to 2.58 +/- 2.19 (P < 0.05) in the combined treatment group and from 6.07 +/-1.60 to 3.46 +/- 1.98 (P < 0.05) in group B. The endoscopic and histologic scores also significantly improved after treatment in both groups (P < 0.05). The difference between the two treatment arms was not significant, but a significantly better improvement vs baseline values (P < 0.05) was observed in the combined treatment group vs the mesalazine group, when considering both the clinical index (delta9.58 +/- 4.19 vs 5.92 +/- 3.48) and the UCDAI score (delta4.67 +/- 2.19 vs 2.54 +/- 2.18). A more favorable trend, although not significant, was observed for all individual parameters in group A. In conclusion, results of the present pilot study indicate that oral butyrate is safe and well tolerated. These data also suggest that oral butyrate may improve the efficacy of oral mesalazine in active ulcerative colitis and prompt the need of a large scale investigation to confirm the present findings.


Subject(s)
Butyrates/administration & dosage , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Mesalamine/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Adult , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis , Colonoscopy , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res ; 18(1): 63-7, 1999 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10374680

ABSTRACT

Over the past 20 years, fiberoptic endoscopy, followed by video-endoscopy, has taken on an increasingly important role in the diagnostics and therapy for digestive tract diseases. Especially in the field of oncology, endoscopy is fundamental not only for the diagnosis and staging of diseases of the gastroenteric tract but also as definitive and/or palliative therapy for tumors that do not respond to radical treatment. Endoscopic techniques are widely employed in diseases of the esophagus and the head and neck district. In fact, it is generally accepted that only 35% of patients with cancer of the esophagus or of the cardias may benefit from surgery with 5-year survival rates of about 5% in Western countries (1, 2).


Subject(s)
Endoscopy, Digestive System , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Dilatation , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Gastrostomy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Humans , Laser Therapy , Palliative Care , Survival Rate
7.
Angiology ; 46(11): 1009-14, 1995 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7486221

ABSTRACT

Kawasaki disease (KD) is a systemic vasculitis syndrome of early childhood. It involves particularly the coronary arteries and may cause aneurysms and thrombotic occlusions. Echocardiography is the most useful method of detecting coronary aneurysms. Nevertheless, obstructive lesions are difficult to evaluate and often need invasive coronary angiography. An important feature of this disease is the possibility of finding coronary pathology several years after the onset. This characteristic makes KD an important cause of coronary artery disease (CAD) in young adults. Thus patients with KD and previously diseased coronary arteries should be kept under long-term control. However, coronary angiography is invasive and cannot be performed repeatedly, especially in young patients. As an alternative, thallium 201 scintigraphy has been employed, but its low-energy photons are suboptimal for standard gamma-camera imaging, particularly in children aged less than three years. To verify the usefulness of a noninvasive assessment of myocardial perfusion, the authors used rest and dipyridamole 99mTc-Sestamibi scan in 15 children (ranging from one to six years of age) with Kawasaki's cardiac involvement. Coronary aneurysms have been demonstrated by echocardiography in 12 patients; 8 patients were also submitted to cardiac catheterization. The sensitivity of 99mTc-Sestamibi imaging for detection of overall coronary lesions was 88% and the specificity was 93%. These data suggest that rest/dipyridamole 99mTc-Sestamibi scintigraphy is an accurate and noninvasive method for the detection and follow-up of Kawasaki's cardiac damage even in patients aged one year.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/diagnostic imaging , Heart/diagnostic imaging , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Child , Child, Preschool , Coronary Disease/etiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Mucocutaneous Lymph Node Syndrome/complications , Radionuclide Imaging , Sensitivity and Specificity , Technetium Tc 99m Sestamibi
8.
Metabolism ; 44(6): 796-9, 1995 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7783666

ABSTRACT

Some data suggest that sorbitol intake may be responsible for diarrhea in diabetic patients. One hundred thirteen hydrogen breath tests were performed in type II diabetics (72) and normal controls (41) after oral loads of sorbitol ranging from 2.5 to 20 g in iso-osmolar solutions to assess the role of malabsorption of this compound in the genesis of abdominal symptoms. The prevalence of sorbitol malabsorption and abdominal symptoms, peak (Cmax H2) and total (Ctot H2) hydrogen production, and mouth to cecum transit time (MCTT) did not differ in type II diabetics and controls. Malabsorption was observed more frequently with the highest doses of sorbitol (10% of patients at a dose of 2.5 g and approximately 75% at 20 g). Symptoms, usually consisting of mild discomfort and abdominal distension, were observed only after sorbitol loads of 10 and 20 g in 27.2% of the diabetics and in 36.3% of the controls. Diarrhea was present in three subjects (two diabetics and one control) only at a dose of 20 g. These data indicate that it is highly unlikely for sorbitol to play a role in inducing diabetes diarrhea. A moderate (up to 10 g) sorbitol intake is not contraindicated in type II diabetics.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/physiopathology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology , Malabsorption Syndromes/complications , Sorbitol/pharmacokinetics , Aged , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sorbitol/administration & dosage , Sorbitol/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...