Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Comput Inform Nurs ; 33(2): 78-84, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25636043

ABSTRACT

High-fidelity simulation has become a growing educational modality among institutions of higher learning ever since the Institute of Medicine recommended that it be used to improve patient safety in 2000. However, there is limited research on the effect of high-fidelity simulation on psychomotor clinical performance improvement of undergraduate nursing students being evaluated by experts using reliable and valid appraisal instruments. The purpose of this integrative review and meta-analysis is to explore what researchers have established about the impact of high-fidelity simulation on improving the psychomotor clinical performance of undergraduate nursing students. Only eight of the 1120 references met inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis using Hedges' g to compute the effect size and direction of impact yielded a range of -0.26 to +3.39. A positive effect was shown in seven of eight studies; however, there were five different research designs and six unique appraisal instruments used among these studies. More research is necessary to determine if high-fidelity simulation improves psychomotor clinical performance in undergraduate nursing students. Nursing programs from multiple sites having a standardized curriculum and using the same appraisal instruments with established reliability and validity are ideal for this work.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Computer Simulation , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate , Psychomotor Performance , Simulation Training , Students, Nursing , Curriculum , Humans , Learning , Manikins
2.
Support Care Cancer ; 23(7): 2019-24, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25519756

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel-based chemotherapy continues to be an integral component of breast cancer treatment. Prolonged use of paclitaxel may result in repeated doses of premedications that can have unwanted side effects. Infusion hypersensitivity reactions occurring beyond the second dose of paclitaxel are infrequent and not well characterized. We previously published the results of a small, prospective pilot trial demonstrating the safety and feasibility of discontinuing premedications in patients who received the first two doses of paclitaxel-based chemotherapy without experiencing an infusion hypersensitivity reaction. In this study, we aimed to retrospectively characterize the incidence of rescue medication using this abbreviated premedication regimen in our institution following the publication of the pilot study. METHODS: Patients with stages I-IV breast cancer who received paclitaxel from January 2011 through June 2013 were screened for eligibility. Patients who did not experience an infusion hypersensitivity reaction with their first or second dose of paclitaxel and discontinued paclitaxel premedication for subsequent doses were included in this analysis. The primary endpoint was to estimate the incidence of rescue medication use for the treatment of paclitaxel infusion hypersensitivity during doses three to six of paclitaxel in the study population. RESULTS: In total, 449 patients received paclitaxel-based chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer during the interval time period. After receiving the first two doses of paclitaxel-based chemotherapy without experiencing an infusion hypersensitivity reaction, 234 breast cancer patients had their premedications discontinued for all remaining paclitaxel doses. These patients tolerated future paclitaxel doses without severe or life-threatening complications related to infusion hypersensitivity. The majority of patients did not have any symptoms of an infusion reaction, with only two of these patients requiring rescue medication to treat an infusion hypersensitivity reaction with subsequent paclitaxel doses (0.85; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.10-3.05 %). CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of paclitaxel premedications in breast cancer patients who have not experienced an infusion hypersensitivity reaction with the first two doses of paclitaxel is not associated with increased rate of rescue medication use for infusion hypersensitivity.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/prevention & control , Paclitaxel/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Diphenhydramine/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Famotidine/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Premedication/methods , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
3.
Biol Res Nurs ; 11(2): 117-8, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19502240
4.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect ; 40(1): 4-13, 2007 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17332901

ABSTRACT

Listeria monocytogenes (commonly called Listeria) is a Gram-positive facultatively intracellular foodborne pathogen often found in food and elsewhere in nature. It can cause a rare but serious disease called listeriosis, especially among pregnant women, the elderly or individuals with a weakened immune system. In serious cases, it can lead to brain infection and even death. Listeria is more likely to cause death than other bacteria that cause food poisoning. In fact, 20 to 30% of food borne listeriosis infections in high-risk individuals may be fatal. Recent technological developments have increased the ability of scientists to identify the cause of foodborne illnesses. L. monocytogenes has been used as a model organism for the study of intracellular parasitism. Whilst the basic mechanisms of cellular pathogenesis have been elucidated by a series of elegant studies, recent research has begun to focus upon the gastrointestinal phase of L. monocytogenes infection. Epidemiological studies of outbreaks of human disease now demonstrate that the pathogen can cause gastroenteritis in the absence of invasive disease and associated mortality. Elucidation of whole genome sequences and virulence determinants have greatly contributed to understanding of the organism and its infection pathways.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Food Microbiology , Listeria monocytogenes , Listeriosis/epidemiology , Listeriosis/physiopathology , Animals , Gastroenteritis/pathology , Genome, Bacterial , Global Health , Humans , Listeria monocytogenes/classification , Listeria monocytogenes/genetics , Listeria monocytogenes/pathogenicity , Species Specificity , Virulence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...