ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The isolated heart apparatus is over 100 years old, but remains a useful research tool today. While designs of many large animal systems have been described in the literature, trouble-shooting and refining such a model to yield a stable, workable system has not been previously described. This paper outlines the issues, in tabular form, that our group encountered in developing our own porcine isolated heart rig with the aim of assisting other workers in the field planning similar work. The paper also highlights some of the modern applications of the isolated heart apparatus. Methods Landrace pigs (50-80 kg) were used in a pilot project to develop the model. The model was then used in a study examining the effects of various cardioplegic solutions on function after reanimation of porcine hearts. During the two projects, non-protocol issues were documented as well as their solutions. These were aggregated in this paper. RESULTS: Issues faced by the group without explicit literature solutions included pig size selection, animal acclimatisation, porcine transoesophageal echocardiography, cannulation and phlebotomy for cross-clamping, cardioplegia delivery, heart suspension and rig tuning. CONCLUSION: Prior recognition of issues and possible solutions faced by workers establishing a porcine isolated heart system will speed progress towards a useable system for research. The isolated heart apparatus remains applicable in transplant, ischaemia reperfusion, heart failure and organ preservation research.
Subject(s)
Heart/physiology , Isolated Heart Preparation/instrumentation , Perfusion/instrumentation , Swine/physiology , Animals , Cardioplegic Solutions/administration & dosage , Equipment Design , Heart Arrest, Induced/instrumentation , Heart Arrest, Induced/methods , Isolated Heart Preparation/methods , Organ Preservation/instrumentation , Organ Preservation/methods , Perfusion/methods , Pilot ProjectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We report the successful transplantation of a heart following an out-of-body time of 611 minutes into a recipient with dilated cardiomyopathy and left ventricular assist device implant. PATIENTS: Our patient was urgently waiting for a cardiac transplant whilst receiving LVAD support. Recurrent VF and repeated AICD shocks necessitated this action. RESULTS: Although requiring ECMO and inotropic support in the first 17 hours post-transplant, the patient was discharged from hospital on day 15 post-transplant with normal cardiac function. CONCLUSION: We report some of the salient points of the process and discuss the utility of this technology to an Australian transplant unit.
