Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 119: 109720, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714069

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Marginal ulcers are an acid-related complication of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Few cases of acute perforation have been described, and there are few reports on viable surgical management. This case report demonstrates a two-step surgical procedure for treating a perforated late marginal ulcer in a patient with sepsis. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 39-year-old smoker presented to the emergency department six years after undergoing a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Diagnostic findings revealed ascites and changes in intestinal calibre, indicating the need for surgery. Intraoperatively, a perforated marginal ulcer covered by the liver was observed. Given the extent of the perforation and the patient's increased instability, discontinuity resection was performed. After stabilisation and improvement in the nutritional status, the gastrojejunostomy was restored nine weeks later. DISCUSSION: Treatment of Marginal ulcers is controversial, with no clear guidelines. However, severe complications require endoscopic or surgical treatment. The literature considers three main surgical treatment options for perforated marginal ulcers: surgical repair, surgical anastomotic revision, and gastric bypass reversal. Complicated situations, significant intraoperative findings, and unstable patients require tailored approaches. CONCLUSION: A two-step procedure with discontinuity resection for damage control surgery, patient stabilisation, and improvement of nutritional status, followed by elective continuity restoration with a new gastrojejunostomy, is considered feasible in critically ill patients.

2.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2021(6): rjab248, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34178304

ABSTRACT

Although rare, postoperatively retained foreign bodies in the abdominal cavity still represent a serious issue for the surgical team as for the patients. Its clinical manifestation is often unspecific and the cases are therefore only irregularly registered. There are several known factors that increase the risk of retention of a foreign body, for example emergency surgeries, unplanned changes in procedure or a high body mass index. In this article, we would like to report the case of a male patient with a foreign body in the right lower quadrant after open appendectomy mimicking a tumor.

3.
Surg Endosc ; 29(12): 3803-5, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25783831

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has become the gold standard in the therapy of benignant and malignant colorectal pathologies. Anastomotic leakage is still a reason for laparotomy; applying a diverting stoma or performing a Hartman's procedure is common [1, 2]. Laparoscopic treatment of an early-detected anastomotic leakage is suggested from other authors [3, 4]. In our video we demonstrate a combined minimal invasive transabdominal and transanal treatment concept in patients with early-detected anastomotic leakage. METHODS: Two consecutive patients developing an anastomotic leakage after single-port laparoscopic sigmoid resection for stage II/III diverticulitis (Hanson & Stock) were treated with a combined minimal invasive approach. Anastomotic leakage was diagnosed by triple contrast computed tomography on postoperative day 4 in patient one and on postoperative day 7 in patient two. Operative treatment was performed immediately on the same day without delay. RESULTS: In both patients a combined transanal and transabdominal approach was performed. First step was a diagnostic laparoscopy in order to exclude fecal peritonitis. Using a single-port device (SILS Port Covidien), transanal inspection of the anastomosis was also performed: In both patients anastomotic tissue margins were vital, and the leakage affected only a quarter of the anastomotic circumference. Transanal stitches were placed to close the anastomotic leakage. Laparoscopic transabdominal irrigation was performed, and two suction drainages were placed in the pelvis. Postoperative antibiotic treatment and a gradual return to slid food were carried out. Functional result at follow-up of 102 and 112 days (with rectoscopy) showed no residual leak and no stricture of the anastomosis, and both of patients had a normal rectal function.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak/surgery , Colectomy/methods , Colon, Sigmoid/surgery , Diverticulitis, Colonic/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Sigmoid Diseases/surgery , Abdomen/surgery , Anal Canal/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...