Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Opt Express ; 30(8): 12510-12520, 2022 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35472885

ABSTRACT

Free-space all-optical diffractive systems have shown promise for neuromorphic classification of objects without converting light to the electronic domain. While the factors that govern these systems have been studied for coherent light, the fundamental properties for incoherent light have not been addressed, despite the importance for many applications. Here we use a co-design approach to show that optimized systems for spatially incoherent light can achieve performance on par with the best linear electronic classifiers even with a single layer containing few diffractive features. This performance is limited by the inherent linear nature of incoherent optical detection. We circumvent this limit by using a differential detection scheme that achieves greater than 94% classification accuracy on the MNIST dataset and greater than 85% classification accuracy for Fashion-MNIST, using a single layer metamaterial.

2.
Front Comput Neurosci ; 14: 39, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32477089

ABSTRACT

Historically, neuroscience principles have heavily influenced artificial intelligence (AI), for example the influence of the perceptron model, essentially a simple model of a biological neuron, on artificial neural networks. More recently, notable recent AI advances, for example the growing popularity of reinforcement learning, often appear more aligned with cognitive neuroscience or psychology, focusing on function at a relatively abstract level. At the same time, neuroscience stands poised to enter a new era of large-scale high-resolution data and appears more focused on underlying neural mechanisms or architectures that can, at times, seem rather removed from functional descriptions. While this might seem to foretell a new generation of AI approaches arising from a deeper exploration of neuroscience specifically for AI, the most direct path for achieving this is unclear. Here we discuss cultural differences between the two fields, including divergent priorities that should be considered when leveraging modern-day neuroscience for AI. For example, the two fields feed two very different applications that at times require potentially conflicting perspectives. We highlight small but significant cultural shifts that we feel would greatly facilitate increased synergy between the two fields.

3.
Neural Comput ; 30(10): 2660-2690, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30021083

ABSTRACT

Neural-inspired spike-based computing machines often claim to achieve considerable advantages in terms of energy and time efficiency by using spikes for computation and communication. However, fundamental questions about spike-based computation remain unanswered. For instance, how much advantage do spike-based approaches have over conventional methods, and under what circumstances does spike-based computing provide a comparative advantage? Simply implementing existing algorithms using spikes as the medium of computation and communication is not guaranteed to yield an advantage. Here, we demonstrate that spike-based communication and computation within algorithms can increase throughput, and they can decrease energy cost in some cases. We present several spiking algorithms, including sorting a set of numbers in ascending/descending order, as well as finding the maximum or minimum or median of a set of numbers. We also provide an example application: a spiking median-filtering approach for image processing providing a low-energy, parallel implementation. The algorithms and analyses presented here demonstrate that spiking algorithms can provide performance advantages and offer efficient computation of fundamental operations useful in more complex algorithms.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...