Brain Metastases from Adult Sarcomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study from the Hellenic Group of Sarcomas and Rare Cancers (HGSRC).

Brain metastases are rare events in patients with sarcoma and the available information is relatively limited. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with sarcoma who developed brain metastases between April 2010 and April 2020 in six centers. Thirty-four adult patients were included with a median age at brain metastases diagnosis of 55.5 years (range, 18-75). The primary sarcomas originated either from soft tissue (n = 27) or bone (n = 7) and the most common subtypes were leiomyosarcoma (n = 8), Ewing sarcoma/peripheral neuroectodermal tumor (PNET) (n = 7) and osteosarcoma (n = 3). Most primary tumors were of high grade and located mainly in the extremities (n = 18). The vast majority of patients at the time of brain metastasis diagnosis already had extracranial metastatic disease (n = 26). The median time from sarcoma diagnosis to cerebral metastasis diagnosis was 16 months (range, 1-136). Treatment modalities for brain metastatic disease included whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) (n = 22), chemotherapy (n = 17), exclusive palliative care (n = 5), surgery (n = 9), targeted therapy (n = 6) or stereotactic radiosurgery (n = 2). Most patients experienced a progression of brain metastases (n = 11). The median overall survival from brain metastasis diagnosis was 3 months (range, 0-80). OS was significantly influenced by time-to-brain metastases (p = 0.041), WBRT (p = 0.018), surgery (p = 0.002) and chemotherapy (p = 0.006). In a multivariate analysis, only the localization of the primary (p = 0.047) and WBRT (p = 0.038) were associated with survival with statistical significance. Patients with sarcoma brain metastases have a particularly poor prognosis and an appropriate therapeutic approach is yet to be defined.

Consensus statement of the Hellenic and Cypriot Gastric Cancer Study Group on the diagnosis, staging and management of gastric cancer.

Gastric Cancer epidemics have changed over recent decades, declining in incidence, shifting from distal to proximal location, transforming from intestinal to diffuse histology. Novel chemotherapeutic agents combined with modern surgical operations hardly changed overall disease related survival. This may be attributed to a substantial inherent geographical variation of disease genetics, but also to a failure to standardize and implement treatment protocols in clinical practice. To overcome these drawbacks in Greece and Cyprus, a Gastric Cancer Study Group under the auspices of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO) and Gastrointestinal Cancer Study Group (GIC-SG) merged their efforts to produce a consensus considering ethnic parameters of healthcare system and the international proposals as well. Utilizing structured meetings of experts, a consensus was reached. To achieve further consensus, statements were subjected to the Delphi methodology by invited multidisciplinary national and international experts. Sentences were considered of high or low consensus if they were voted by ≥ 80%, or < 80%, respectively; those obtaining a low consensus level after both voting rounds were rejected. Forty-five statements were developed and voted by 71 experts. The median rate of abstention per statement was 9.9% (range: 0-53.5%). At the end of the process, one statement was rejected, another revised, and all the remaining achieved a high consensus. Forty-four recommendations covering all aspects of the management of gastric cancer and concise treatment algorithms are proposed by the Hellenic and Cypriot Gastric Cancer Study Group. The importance of centralization, care by a multidisciplinary team, adherence to guidelines, and individualization are emphasized.

Consensus statement of the Hellenic and Cypriot Oesophageal Cancer Study Group on the diagnosis, staging and management of oesophageal cancer.

In spite of recent advances in the diagnosis and management of oesophageal cancer, the overall survival of the disease worldwide remains disappointingly low. In Greece and Cyprus, this may be partly due to a failure of health care providers to implement standardised treatment protocols in clinical practice. Development of clinical practice guidelines was undertaken as a joint project between the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO) and Gastro-Intestinal Cancer Study Group (GIC-SG) in an effort to provide guidance for Greek and Cypriot clinicians in all aspects of the management of oesophageal cancer. A study group was formed comprising clinicians from different disciplines with a special interest in the management of oesophageal cancer. Following extensive review of the literature, the members of the group met in person and consensus statements were developed, which were later subjected to the Delphi survey process by invited national and international experts. Statements that achieved a rate of voting consensus > 80% were adopted. Those that reached a voting consensus of < 80% were revised or rejected. In total, 46 sentences were developed and subjected to the voting process. Of those, 45 sentences achieved a rate of consensus > 80% during the first voting round. One sentence that did not reach a satisfactory rate of consensus was revised by the members of the study group and subsequently incorporated to the final statement. Forty-six recommendations covering all aspects of the management of oesophageal cancer and concise treatment algorithms are proposed by the Hellenic and Cypriot Oesophageal Cancer Study Group. In particular, centralisation of services, care by multidisciplinary teams and adherence to clinical guidelines are strongly recommended.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of metastatic colorectal cancer: a consensus statement of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncologists (HeSMO).

There is discrepancy and failure to adhere to current international guidelines for the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) in hospitals in Greece and Cyprus. The aim of the present document is to provide a consensus on the multidisciplinary management of metastastic CRC, considering both special characteristics of our Healthcare System and international guidelines. Following discussion and online communication among the members of an executive team chosen by the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), a consensus for metastastic CRC disease was developed. Statements were subjected to the Delphi methodology on two voting rounds by invited multidisciplinary international experts on CRC. Statements reaching level of agreement by ≥80% were considered as having achieved large consensus, whereas statements reaching 60-80% moderate consensus. One hundred and nine statements were developed. Ninety experts voted for those statements. The median rate of abstain per statement was 18.5% (range: 0-54%). In the end of the process, all statements achieved a large consensus. The importance of centralization, care by a multidisciplinary team, adherence to guidelines, and personalization is emphasized. R0 resection is the only intervention that may offer substantial improvement in the oncological outcomes.

Clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer: a consensus statement of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncologists (HeSMO).

In rectal cancer management, accurate staging by magnetic resonance imaging, neo-adjuvant treatment with the use of radiotherapy, and total mesorectal excision have resulted in remarkable improvement in the oncological outcomes. However, there is substantial discrepancy in the therapeutic approach and failure to adhere to international guidelines among different Greek-Cypriot hospitals. The present guidelines aim to aid the multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer, considering both the local special characteristics of our healthcare system and the international relevant agreements (ESMO, EURECCA). Following background discussion and online communication sessions for feedback among the members of an executive team, a consensus rectal cancer management was obtained. Statements were subjected to the Delphi methodology voting system on two rounds to achieve further consensus by invited multidisciplinary international experts on colorectal cancer. Statements were considered of high, moderate or low consensus if they were voted by ≥80%, 60-80%, or <60%, respectively; those obtaining a low consensus level after both voting rounds were rejected. One hundred and two statements were developed and voted by 100 experts. The mean rate of abstention per statement was 12.5% (range: 2-45%). In the end of the process, all statements achieved a high consensus. Guidelines and algorithms of diagnosis and treatment were proposed. The importance of centralization, care by a multidisciplinary team, adherence to guidelines, and personalization is emphasized.

Clinical practice guidelines for the surgical management of colon cancer: a consensus statement of the Hellenic and Cypriot Colorectal Cancer Study Group by the HeSMO.

Despite considerable improvement in the management of colon cancer, there is a great deal of variation in the outcomes among European countries, and in particular among different hospital centers in Greece and Cyprus. Discrepancy in the approach strategies and lack of adherence to guidelines for the management of colon cancer may explain the situation. The aim was to elaborate a consensus on the multidisciplinary management of colon cancer, based on European guidelines (ESMO and EURECCA), and also taking into account local special characteristics of our healthcare system. Following discussion and online communication among members of an executive team, a consensus was developed. Statements entered the Delphi voting system on two rounds to achieve consensus by multidisciplinary international experts. Statements with an agreement rate of ≥80% achieved a large consensus, while those with an agreement rate of 60-80% a moderate consensus. Statements achieving an agreement of <60% after both rounds were rejected and not presented. Sixty statements on the management of colon cancer were subjected to the Delphi methodology. Voting experts were 109. The median rate of abstain per statement was 10% (range: 0-41%). In the end of the voting process, all statements achieved a consensus by more than 80% of the experts. A consensus on the management of colon cancer was developed by applying the Delphi methodology. Guidelines are proposed along with algorithms of diagnosis and treatment. The importance of centralization, care by a multidisciplinary team, and adherence to guidelines is emphasized.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer: a consensus statement of the Hellenic and Cypriot Colorectal Cancer Study Group by the HeSMO.

Colorectal cancer remains a major cause of cancer mortality in the Western world both in men and women. In this manuscript a concise overview and recommendations on adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer are presented. An executive team from the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology was assigned to develop a consensus statement and guidelines on the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer. Fourteen statements on adjuvant treatment were subjected to the Delphi methodology. Voting experts were 68. All statements achieved a rate of consensus above than 80% (>87%) and none revised and entered to a second round of voting. Three and 8 of them achieved a 100 and an over than 90% consensus, respectively. These statements describe evaluations of therapies in clinical practice. They could be considered as general guidelines based on best available evidence for assistance in treatment decision-making. Furthermore, they serve to identify questions and targets for further research and the settings in which investigational therapy could be considered.

Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer.

During the past few decades, significant progress has been achieved in the management of rectal cancer with the introduction of total mesorectal excision. The role of radiotherapy in improving local control and survival has been investigated extensively. Randomized trials of preoperative radiotherapy reported statistically significant lower local recurrence rates with either short regimens (25 Gy in 5 fractions) or conventionally fractionated regimens (45-50 Gy in 25 fractions) and some also showed a survival improvement. Preoperative radiotherapy appears more effective in terms of local control and toxicity compared to postoperative therapy. Several recent studies show that 5-FU-based chemotherapy enhances tumor response to radiotherapy and preoperative chemoradiotherapy is being increasingly used for stage II and III disease.

Diagnostic 131I whole body scanning after thyroidectomy and ablation for differentiated thyroid cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of the diagnostic whole body (131)I scan after thyroidectomy and (131)I ablation. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of all patients with differentiated thyroid cancer treated in one centre between 1990 and 2000. RESULTS: A total of 153 consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic scanning following ablative therapy were identified. This diagnostic scan was positive in 20 patients (13%) and faintly positive in 16 patients (11%). The majority (117 patients) had negative scans. Of the 20 patients with positive scans, four received no further treatment, nine showed no abnormal uptake following a second ablative (131)I dose and seven had uptake in the thyroid bed (six) or in neck nodes (one) after repeat ablation. OUTCOME: In the group with positive scans, the four patients who received no further treatment and the nine with a negative second ablation scan remained disease free during follow-up. No patient with a positive diagnostic scan received additional (131)I therapy which would not otherwise have been given based on the clinical findings, serum thyroglobulin (Tg) values or the presence of anti-Tg antibodies. Ten of the patients with negative scans developed recurrent disease which was always detected clinically or by a rising serum Tg value. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic whole body (131)I scans add little extra information and in our experience do not influence patient management. They should be reserved for patients in whom serum Tg levels are unreliable because of the presence of antibodies or when there is clinical suspicion of tumour.

Long-term results in elderly patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The authors assessed the biologic behavior of differentiated thyroid carcinoma in patients age 70 years or older and evaluated factors that influenced long-term survival. METHODS: Among 1448 patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma who were treated at the authors' institution over the past 60 years, 111 patients were identified who were age 70 years or older at the time of their initial diagnosis (range, 70-93 years). The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of the outcome of these 111 patients, who had a median follow-up of 9 years (range, 2-9 years). RESULTS: There were 83 female patients and 28 male patients (female to male ratio, 3:1). Fifty-eight tumors were papillary, 46 tumors were follicular, and 7 tumors were Hürthle cell carcinoma. Eighty percent of patients presented with a thyroid mass, and 70% of tumors were pathologic stage T3 (pT3) or pT4. Lymph node disease was evident at presentation in 44% of patients, and distant metastases were documented at diagnosis in 23% of patients. Forty-six patients underwent total thyroidectomy, and the remaining patients underwent subtotal thyroidectomy or biopsy only. Radioiodine was administered to 80 patients, and external beam radiotherapy was administered to 19 patients. The cause specific survival rates were 75%, 50%, and 50% at 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of metastases was the most important independent prognostic factor for survival. External beam radiotherapy was associated with a poorer prognosis, in that it was reserved for patients with either inoperable disease or residual disease after surgery and patients with no uptake of radioiodine. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of thyroid tumors showed extrathyroid spread and distant metastases, which frequently were not iodine-avid. The prevalent histologic type was papillary, often with features of poor differentiation. Thyroid carcinoma in the elderly appears to behave more aggressively, and they have a less favorable prognosis compared with younger adults.

Management of thyroid cancer.

Thyroid cancers are a diverse group of malignant disorders ranging from indolent micropapillary carcinoma, which has no effect on life expectancy, to anaplastic tumours, which are invariably fatal even with aggressive treatment. Although the estimated incidence has increased by 14.6% over the past 40 years, the estimated death rate has fallen by 21%, probably as a result of earlier diagnosis. The natural history of thyroid tumours is no longer a mystery, and the prognostic factors identified can predict outcome fairly accurately. Improvements in management have mostly depended on information from large retrospective series, though there are still many areas open to debate. There has been, however, a general acceptance that thyroid cancer should be managed by multidisciplinary teams in specialised units following evidence-based guidelines.

Testicular dose and fertility in men following I(131) therapy for thyroid cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Young adults with differentiated thyroid cancer are treated with high doses of radioiodine and have an excellent long-term prognosis. However, there is limited information on the effects of this treatment on the gonads and fertility in male patients. We have reviewed the outcome of treatment in our centre with respect to male fertility. We have also assessed directly the radiation dose received by the testes. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of males attending the thyroid clinic at the Royal Marsden Hospital for treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer. A prospective study was also performed to assess radiation dose to testes in 14 consecutive patients attending for thyroid cancer treatment. PATIENTS: Males under the age of 40 years at the time of treatment with a minimum of 3 years follow-up. MEASUREMENTS: Number of children fathered by patients and number of congenital malformations. For the prospective study: gonadal function assessed by serum FSH, LH and testosterone measurements; radiation dose to the testes (Gy) measured by thermoluminescent dosimetry. RESULTS: Fertility was assessed in 122 men with a median follow-up of 21 years (range 3-39) of whom 93 were under active follow-up. One hundred and six children were fathered by 59 patients; the remainder had no wish to have children. No major malformations were reported. Of these 59 patients, 12 had received a single 3 GBq ablation dose, 19 had been treated with up to 14 GBq radioiodine and 28 had received up to 44 GBq. In 14 patients followed prospectively, the median estimated radiation dose to each testis was 6.4 cGy following 3 GBq, 14.1 cGy following 5.5 GBq and 21.2 cGy following 9.2 GBq. There was a transient elevation in serum FSH after radioiodine which normalized within 9 months from the last administration. CONCLUSIONS: Radioiodine treatment for thyroid cancer may result in transient impairment of gonadal function. The radiation dose absorbed by the testis after a single ablative dose of radioiodine is well below that associated with permanent damage to germinal epithelium and the risk of infertility in these patients is minimal. Patients requiring multiple administrations for persistent or metastatic thyroid cancer may be at greater risk of gonadal damage although even in this group, we found no evidence of infertility.