The continuing epidemics of obesity and diabetes in the United States.

CONTEXT: Recent reports show that obesity and diabetes have increased in the United States in the past decade. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and use of weight control strategies among US adults in 2000. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a random-digit telephone survey conducted in all states in 2000, with 184 450 adults aged 18 years or older. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Body mass index (BMI), calculated from self-reported weight and height; self-reported diabetes; prevalence of weight loss or maintenance attempts; and weight control strategies used. RESULTS: In 2000, the prevalence of obesity (BMI >/=30 kg/m(2)) was 19.8%, the prevalence of diabetes was 7.3%, and the prevalence of both combined was 2.9%. Mississippi had the highest rates of obesity (24.3%) and of diabetes (8.8%); Colorado had the lowest rate of obesity (13.8%); and Alaska had the lowest rate of diabetes (4.4%). Twenty-seven percent of US adults did not engage in any physical activity, and another 28.2% were not regularly active. Only 24.4% of US adults consumed fruits and vegetables 5 or more times daily. Among obese participants who had had a routine checkup during the past year, 42.8% had been advised by a health care professional to lose weight. Among participants trying to lose or maintain weight, 17.5% were following recommendations to eat fewer calories and increase physical activity to more than 150 min/wk. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of obesity and diabetes continues to increase among US adults. Interventions are needed to improve physical activity and diet in communities nationwide.

Recording of diabetes on death certificates. Has it improved?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the recording of diabetes on death certificates improved from 1986 to 1993. METHOD: Comparison of two National Mortality Follow-back Surveys that selected independent samples of death certificates with the purpose of obtaining information from informants about the decedents. RESULTS: The recording of diabetes on death certificates did not improve from 1986 to 1993. CONCLUSION: Periodic monitoring of the accuracy of death certificates is essential for proper interpretation of mortality statistics which are routinely used to describe the burden of diabetes in our society.

Report of the health care delivery work group: behavioral research related to the establishment of a chronic disease model for diabetes care.

As one of four work groups for the November 1999 conference on Behavioral Science Research in Diabetes, sponsored by the National Institute on Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the health care delivery work group evaluated the status of research on quality of care, patient-provider interactions, and health care systems' innovations related to improved diabetes outcomes. In addition, we made recommendations for future research. In this article, which was developed and modified at the November conference by experts in health care delivery, diabetes and behavioral science, we summarize the literature on patient-provider interactions, diabetes care and self-management support among underserved and minority populations, and implementation of chronic care management systems for diabetes. We conclude that, although the quality of care provided to the vast majority of diabetic patients is problematic, this is principally not the fault of either individual patients or health care professionals. Rather, it is a systems issue emanating from the acute illness model of care, which still predominates. Examples of proactive population-based chronic care management programs incorporating behavioral principles are discussed. The article concludes by identifying barriers to the establishment of a chronic care model (e.g., lack of supportive policies, understanding of population-based management, and information systems) and priorities for future research in this area needed to overcome these barriers.

Diabetes--a common, growing, serious, costly, and potentially preventable public health problem.

An estimated 135 million people worldwide had diagnosed diabetes in 1995, and this number is expected to rise to at least 300 million by 2025. The number of people with diabetes will increase by 42% (from 51 to 72 million) in industrialized countries between 1995 and 2025 and by 170% (from 84 to 228 million) in industrializing countries. Several potentially modifiable risk factors are related to diabetes, including insulin resistance, obesity, physical inactivity and dietary factors. Diabetes may be preventable in high-risk groups, but results of ongoing clinical trials are pending. Several efficacious and economically acceptable treatment strategies are currently available (control of glycemia, blood pressure, lipids; early detection and treatment of retinopathy, nephropathy, foot-disease; use of aspirin and ACE inhibitors) to reduce the burden of diabetes complications. Diabetes is a major public health problem and is emerging as a pandemic. While prevention of diabetes may become possible in the future, there is considerable potential now to better utilize existing treatments to reduce diabetes complications. Many countries could benefit from research aimed at better understanding the reasons why existing treatments are under-used and how this can be changed.

Diabetes trends in the U.S.: 1990-1998.

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in diabetes prevalence in the U.S. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was conducted via telephone surveys in states that participated in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System between 1990 and 1998. The participants consisted of noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 years or older. The main outcome measure was self-reported diabetes. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes rose from 4.9% in 1990 to 6.5% in 1998--an increase of 33%. Increases were observed in both sexes, all ages, all ethnic groups, all education levels, and nearly all states. Changes in prevalence varied by state. The prevalence of diabetes was highly correlated with the prevalence of obesity (r = 0.64, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of diabetes continues to increase rapidly in the U.S. Because the prevalence of obesity is also rising, diabetes will become even more common. Major efforts are needed to alter these trends.

If diabetes is a public health problem, why not treat it as one? A population-based approach to chronic illness.

It is increasingly acknowledged that diabetes and other chronic illnesses are major public health problems. Medicare and many managed health care organizations have recognized the enormous personal and societal costs of uncontrolled diabetes in terms of complications, patient quality of life, and health care system resources. However, the current system of reactive acute-episode focused disease care practiced in many settings does not adequately address this public health problem. An alternative proactive, population-based approach to chronic illnesses such as diabetes is proposed and illustrated. This multilevel systems approach addresses supportive and inhibitory social-environmental factors at multiple levels (personal, family, health care team, work, neighborhood, community). Key disciplines contributing to a population-based approach to diabetes include epidemiology, behavioral science, health care services, public health, health economics, and quality of life professions. Current and potential contributions of each of these disciplines are illustrated and an integrative, population-based systems approach to diabetes management and prevention of complications is proposed. This approach is also seen as applicable to other chronic illnesses.

Is diabetes mellitus associated with prostate cancer incidence and survival?

Results of two recent prospective incidence studies have suggested that certain subgroups of men with diabetes mellitus may be protected from developing prostate cancer. Two earlier studies, however, concluded that diabetes increased the risk of mortality from prostate cancer. With hundreds of thousands of male respondents, the 1959-1972 Cancer Prevention Study provided a unique opportunity to explore whether men with diabetes were more likely to develop prostate cancer during a 13-year follow-up period than were men without diabetes. After adjusting for factors associated with prostate cancer in previous studies, we found little association between diabetes at baseline and prostate cancer incidence [incidence density ratio (IDR) = 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.81-1.36]. Men who had diabetes mellitus for 5 or more years, however, had a higher incidence of prostate cancer than did men without diabetes (IDR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.02-2.38). Among all study participants who were diagnosed with prostate cancer, men with diabetes were only slightly more likely to die from prostate cancer than were men without diabetes (IDR = 1.11; 95% CI = 0.76-1.62).

The use of population attributable risk to estimate the impact of prevention and early detection of type 2 diabetes on population-wide mortality risk in US males.

The Population Attributable Risk (PAR) represents the proportion of the deaths (in a specified time) in the whole population that may be preventable if a cause of mortality were totally eliminated. This population-based measure was used to assess the potential impact of three public health interventions for type 2 diabetes (early detection + standard therapy; early detection + intensive therapy; and primary prevention) on the mortality risk from all causes and from cardiovascular (CVD) diseases. Potential reduction in mortality risks for several levels of compliance or implementation (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%) for each intervention were also estimated. Results suggest that among males aged 45-74 years, the interventions may have greater population-wide impact on total deaths among black males, and greater impact on the CVD deaths among white males. Overall, primary prevention (reduction in all-cause mortality 6.2-10.0%, and CVD mortality 7.9-9.0%) may offer greater marginal benefit than screening and early treatment (reduction in all-cause mortality 3.5-8.3%, and CVD mortality 2.8-8.6%). Often the question facing policy makers is not simply whether to but how much of an intervention is worth implementing? Estimated benefits for various intensities of intervention (as provided) may be useful to assess the likely marginal benefits of each intervention, and can be especially useful if combined with estimated marginal costs.

Strategies to improve diabetes care delivery.

Although the primary care office is an important location for integrating new advances in the treatment of diabetes, the current delivery of preventive primary care for patients with diabetes falls short of clinical recommendations. Barriers within the existing health care system, practice structure, and physician and patient support services are among the most commonly cited obstacles to initiating better preventive care. As public health groups demand greater accountability from the medical system, regulatory efforts focus more scrutiny on systems, clinic practices, and even individual physician practices. Although improving care delivery effectively and efficiently is difficult, strategies to exist that can increase the likelihood of improving patient outcomes. Successful diabetes initiatives are often characterized by the consensual adoption of an evidence-based treatment plan. Effective physician-oriented interventions include the use of reminder systems, local opinion leaders, and academic detailing. In addition, several national diabetes initiatives are likely to influence primary care practice. New measures of accountability will be widely used to determine the quality of primary diabetes care delivery.