ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The etiology of sleep bruxism in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients is not yet fully clarified. This prospective clinical study aimed to investigate the connection between probable sleep bruxism, electromyographic muscle tone, and respiratory sleep patterns recorded during polysomnography. METHODS: 106 patients with OSA (74 males, 31 females, mean age: 56.1 ± 11.4 years) were divided into two groups (sleep bruxism: SB; no sleep bruxism: NSB). Probable SB were based on the AASM criteria: self-report of clenching/grinding, orofacial symptoms upon awakening, abnormal tooth wear and hypertrophy of the masseter muscle. Both groups underwent clinical examination for painful muscle symptoms aligned with Temporomandibular Disorders Diagnostic Criteria (DC/TMD), such as myalgia, myofascial pain, and headache attributed to temporomandibular disorder. Additionally, non-complaint positive muscle palpation and orofacial-related limitations (Jaw Functional Limited Scale-20: JFLS-20) were assessed. A one-night polysomnography with electromyographic masseter muscle tone (EMG) measurement was performed. Descriptive data, inter-group comparisons and multivariate logistic regression were calculated. RESULTS: OSA patients had a 37.1% prevalence of SB. EMG muscle tone (N1-N3, REM; P = 0.001) and the number of hypopneas (P = 0.042) were significantly higher in the sleep bruxism group. While measures like apnea-hypopnea-index (AHI), respiratory-disturbance-index (RDI), apnea index (AI), hypopnea-index (HI), number of arousals, and heart rate (1/min) were elevated in sleep bruxers, the differences were not statistically significant. There was no difference in sleep efficiency (SE; P = 0.403). Non-complaint masseter muscle palpation (61.5%; P = 0.015) and myalgia (41%; P = 0.010) were significant higher in SB patients. Multivariate logistic regression showed a significant contribution of EMG muscle tone and JFLS-20 to bruxism risk. CONCLUSION: Increased EMG muscle tone and orofacial limitations can predict sleep bruxism in OSA patients. Besides, SB patients suffer more from sleep disorder breathing. Thus, sleep bruxism seems to be not only an oral health related problem in obstructive apnea. Consequently, interdisciplinary interventions are crucial for effectively treating these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Philipps-University Marburg (reg. no. 13/22-2022) and registered at the "German Clinical Trial Register, DRKS" (DRKS0002959).
Subject(s)
Electromyography , Polysomnography , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Sleep Bruxism , Humans , Male , Female , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Sleep Bruxism/complications , Sleep Bruxism/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Masseter Muscle/physiopathology , Oral Health , Adult , Muscle Tonus/physiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Snoring was monitored in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) using the LEOSound-Monitor and simultaneously polysomnographic (PSG) recording. In obstructive apneas snoring is normally apparent after apnea termination and the beginning of ventilation. We wanted to know how often obstructive apneas are terminated by ventilation in combination with snoring. METHODS AND INTENTION: In 40 patients with OSA (AHI > 15/h) simultaneous polysomnographic recordings were performed amongst long-term respiratory sound monitoring using the LEOSound monitor. Patients' average age was 57±11 years. Average weight was 100±19 kg by a mean body mass index (BMI) of 33±7 kg/m2. 12 out of 40 recordings had to be rejected for further analysis because of artifacts. Snoring recorded by polysomnography was compared with snoring monitored by LEOSound. RESULTS: 3778 obstructive apnea episodes were monitored. LEOSound identified snoring in 1921 (51,0%), polysomnography in 2229 (58,8%) obstructive apneas. Only in one patient there was a higher difference in snoring episodes between PSG and LEOSound. DISCUSSION: In nearly 60% of obstructive apnea events we found snoring during apnea-terminating hyperpnoea. LEOSound is a good diagnostic tool to monitor snoring. It is necessary to clarify why only 60% of all obstructive events/hyperpnoea develop snoring. From a pathophysiological point of view opening of collapsed upper airway should lead in a very high percentage to turbulences in airstream and committed snoring.
Subject(s)
Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Snoring/diagnosis , Snoring/etiology , Polysomnography/adverse effects , Polysomnography/methods , RespirationABSTRACT
Otorhinolaryngologists play a vital role in the management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in Germany, particularly with regards to outpatient diagnostics as well as conservative and surgical treatment of patients with intolerance to ventilation therapy. Although establishment of differential indications for surgical therapy and performance of additional preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopy in patients with sleep-disordered breathing are among the core competencies of otorhinolaryngologists, differential diagnostic considerations and detection of comorbid sleep disorders can be challenging, particularly for those without extensive sleep medicine training and experience. However, detection of comorbid sleep disorders is of particular importance when permanent surgical treatment is considered. Daytime sleepiness is the typical leading symptom of OSA; nevertheless, other disorders of hypersomnolence need to be considered in these patients and can easily be overlooked. This may lead to inadequate indications for surgical treatment. Based on two case reports, narcolepsy is presented as a comorbid disorder and differential diagnosis in patients with OSA.
Subject(s)
Disorders of Excessive Somnolence , Medicine , Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Diagnosis, Differential , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/diagnosis , Germany , Humans , Sleep , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/diagnosisABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Snoring was monitored in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) using the LEOSound-Monitor and simultaneously polysomnographic (PSG) recording. In obstructive apneas snoring is normally apparent after apnea termination and the beginning of ventilation. We wanted to know how often obstructive apneas are terminated by ventilation in combination with snoring. METHODS AND INTENTION: In 40 patients with OSA (AHIâ>â15/h) simultaneous polysomnographic recordings were performed amongst long-term respiratory sound monitoring using the LEOSound monitor. Patients' average age was 57â±â11 years. Average weight was 100â±â19âkg by a mean body âmass âindex (BMI) of 33â±â7âkg/m2. 12 out of 40 recordings had to be rejected for further analysis because of artifacts. Snoring recorded by polysomnography was compared with snoring monitored by LEOSound. RESULTS: 3778 obstructive apnea episodes were monitored. LEOSound identified snoring in 1921 (51,0â%), polysomnography in 2229 (58,8â%) obstructive apneas. Only in one patient there was a higher difference in snoring episodes between PSG and LEOSound. DISCUSSION: In nearly 60â% of obstructive apnea events we found snoring during apnea-terminating hyperpnoea. LEOSound is a good diagnostic tool to monitor snoring. It is necessary to clarify why only 60â% of all obstructive events/hyperpnoea develop snoring. From a pathophysiological point of view opening of collapsed upper airway should lead in a very high percentage to turbulences in airstream and committed snoring.
Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction/etiology , Polysomnography/methods , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Snoring/diagnosis , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Middle Aged , Respiration , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/epidemiology , Snoring/etiologyABSTRACT
Medication management of asthma is based on level of asthma control. GINA defined criteria for asthma control include asking about daytime symptoms, limitation of activity, nocturnal symptoms/awakenings and need for reliever treatment. Effective asthma control is necessary for preventing exacerbations and worsening of lung function. Standardized and validated questionnaires such as asthma control test (ACT) help to assess the level of asthma control. Asthma control is classified as controlled, partially controlled or uncontrolled. Multicenter studies like REALISE and AIRE give health care professionals information about effectiveness and adherence to medication over nearly 15 years. Asthma is still poorly controlled in more than 50â% of patients despite the availability of very effective drugs. Low adherence to the treatment, fear of systemic side effects related to long term treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, inadequate knowledge of the disease may be responsible factors for bad asthma control. Optimized tools for disease management and intensified education are necessary for therapeutic success.
