Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Eur J Radiol ; 175: 111401, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38604091

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Several studies report occupational orthopedic problems among interventional cardiologists. These health problems are usually multifactorial. However, the personal protective equipment used should play a major role. An online survey was conducted to determine the frequency of such health problems among interventional radiologists and to correlate them with the use of personal radiation protective clothing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An anonymous online survey that comprised of 17 questions was sent via e-mail to 1427 members of the German Society for Interventional Radiology (DeGIR) in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The questions were focused on interventional workload, the use of personal radiation protection apparel and orthopedic problems. Given the different scale levels, the associations between the variables were analyzed using different statistical methods. A significance level of p < 0.05 was chosen. RESULTS: There were 221 survey responders (15.5% response rate). About half of responders (47.7%) suffered from more than five episodes of orthopedic problems during their interventional career. Lumbar spine was involved in 81.7% of these cases, cervical spine in 32.8%, shoulder in 28.5% and knee in 24.7%. Because of orthopedic problems, 16.1% of the responders had to reduce and 2.7% had to stop their interventional practice. The number of affected body regions correlates with the fit of the radiation protection means (p < 0.05, r = 0.135) and the reduction of activity as an interventional radiologist (p < 0.05, r = -0.148). CONCLUSION: Overall, the survey reveals widespread orthopedic problems at several body regions among interventional radiologists, associated with the fit of radiation protection systems, among other factors. A connection between the orthopaedic complaints and the radiation protection system used could not be established.


Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases , Radiation Protection , Radiology, Interventional , Humans , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiology, Interventional/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Germany/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Protective Clothing/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/prevention & control , Musculoskeletal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Interventional/statistics & numerical data , Austria/epidemiology
2.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 44(3): 452-459, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33145701

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The presence of metal implants may reduce angiographic image quality due to automated beam adjustments. Digital variance angiography (DVA) is reported to be superior to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with increased contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and better image quality. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether DVA could counterbalance the image quality impairment of lower-limb angiographies with metal implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 2019 to January 2020, 85 raw lower-limb iodine contrast angiograms of 12 patients with metal implants were processed retrospectively with DVA analyses. For objective comparison, CNR of DSA and DVA images was calculated and the ratio CNRDVA/CNRDSA was determined. Visual image quality was evaluated in a paired comparison and by a five-grade Likert scale by three experienced radiologists. RESULTS: The CNR was calculated and compared in 1252 regions of interest in 37 image pairs containing metal implants. The median ratio of CNRDVA/CNRDSA was 1.84 with an interquartile range of 1.35-2.32. Paired comparison resulted in 84.5% in favour of DVA with an interrater agreement of 83.2% (Fleiss κ 0.454, p < 0.001). The overall image quality scores for DSA and DVA were 3.64 ± 0.08 and 4.43 ± 0.06, respectively (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) with consistently higher individual ratings for DVA. CONCLUSION: Our small-sample pilot study shows that DVA provides significantly improved image quality in lower-limb angiography with metal implants, compared to DSA imaging. The improved CNR suggest that this approach could reduce radiation exposure for lower-limb angiography with metal implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, case studies.


Subject(s)
Angiography, Digital Subtraction/methods , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Leg/blood supply , Leg/diagnostic imaging , Prostheses and Implants , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Artifacts , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Male , Metals , Pilot Projects , Retrospective Studies
3.
Eur J Radiol ; 132: 109245, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33011604

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Radiation-absorbing pads are an additional possibility to reduce scattered radiation at its source. The goal of this study is to investigate the efficacy of a new reusable radiation-absorbing pad at its origin in an experimental setup. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All measurements were carried out using a clinical angiography system with a standardized fluoroscopy protocol, different C-arm angulations and an anthropomorphic torso phantom as a scattering body. An ionization chamber was used to measure the radiation exposure at five different heights of a simulated operator during a simulated transfemoral angiography intervention. Measurements were carried out with and without radiation-absorbing pads with lead equivalents of 0.25 and 0.5 mm placed onto the scattering body. For all measurements a mobile acrylic shield and an under-table lead curtain was used. RESULTS: At all operator heights from 100 to 165 cm a significant radiation dose reduction of up to 80.6 % (p < 0.01) using the radiation-absorbing pad was measured, when compared to no radiation-absorbing pad. At the height of 165 cm the radiation-absorbing pad with a lead equivalence of 0.5 mm showed a significant radiation dose reduction (51.4 %, p < 0.01) in comparison to a lead equivalence of 0.25 mm. CONCLUSION: The addition of a radiation-absorbing pad to the standard protection means results in a significant dose reduction for the operator, particularly for upper body parts.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Radiation Exposure , Radiation Protection , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiography, Interventional , Radiology, Interventional , Scattering, Radiation
4.
Eur J Radiol ; 131: 109244, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32905956

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To ensure that patients survive cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is needed. However, the procedure itself can lead to severe injuries. This study aims to examine both possibilities of resuscitation - mechanical or manual - with regard to their risk of injury. To this end, we compare the injuries patterns in both groups of patients after successful resuscitation based on computer tomography (CT). METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study included 32 patients (female: 21.87 %, male: 78.12 %, Mean age: 60.22 ± 13.93 years) with cardiac arrest followed by successful mechanical CPR, who underwent an early whole-body CT. A control group of 32 patients (female: 21.87 %, male: 78.12 %, mean age: 60.75 ± 13.34 years) that had been resuscitated successfully with manual CPR was matched according to gender and age for a better statistical comparison. Patients with cardiac arrest due to trauma were excluded from the study population. RESULTS: Mechanically resuscitated patients showed significantly more CPR-related injuries than those who were resuscitated manually (100 % vs. 84.37 %; p = 0.02). In particular, dislocated rib fractures (40.47 vs. 23.80 mean rank, p < 0.01), sternal fractures (74.19 % vs. 25 %; p < 0,01), bleeding complications (29.03 % vs. 3.12 %; p = 0.01), pneumothorax (38.71 % vs. 9.37 %; p = 0.01), mediastinal haematomas (58.01 % vs. 25 %, p = 0.01) and liver lacerations (29.03 % vs. 0 %, p = 0.04) were observed significantly more in patients after mechanical CPR compared to those with manual resuscitation. CONCLUSIONS: The guideline-based use of mechanical CPR results in a significant increase of internal and musculoskeletal injuries compared to manual CPR.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/adverse effects , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Heart Arrest/therapy , Thoracic Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Injuries/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/instrumentation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Rib Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Rib Fractures/etiology , Survivors
5.
Emerg Radiol ; 27(1): 23-29, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31468207

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Non-traumatic cardiac arrest (CA) and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are often associated with multiple pathologies. Expecting a high prevalence of important findings, a whole-body CT (WBCT) could be of relevance for therapy. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and diagnostic yield of an early WBCT in this setting. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 100 consecutive patients (27 female; 73 male; mean age 68.5± 12.57 years) with non-traumatic, in- and out-of-hospital CA and ROSC following CPR, who underwent a contrast-enhanced WBCT within 6 h after ROSC over 12 months. CT findings were determined corresponding to anatomical region. RESULTS: Early WBCT was successfully carried out in 100% of the patients with CA and ROSC after CPR. Acute pathologies were found not only in the chest but also in the head (15%) and the abdomen (6%). Early global brain edema (n = 12), acute stroke (n = 3), pulmonary embolism (n = 10), pneumothorax (26%), acute abdominal pathologies (n = 6), iatrogenic bleeding (4%), and CPR-related injuries (93%) were detected by CT right from the beginning of the post-cardiac arrest care. CONCLUSIONS: An early WBCT is feasible and provides added diagnostic value for patients with ROSC after non-traumatic CA.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Heart Arrest/complications , Heart Arrest/therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Whole Body Imaging , Aged , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies
6.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 43(1): 127-134, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31489475

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of different designs and types of ocular radiation protection devices depending on simulated varied body heights in a phantom-simulated thoracic intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A clinical angiography system with a standardized fluoroscopy protocol with an anthropomorphic chest phantom as a scattering object and optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters for measuring radiation dose were used. The dosimeters were placed at the position of eyes of an anthropomorphic head phantom simulating the examiner. The head phantom was placed on a height-adjustable stand simulating the height of the examiner from 160 to 200 cm with 10 cm increments. The dose values were then measured with no radiation protection, a weightless-like radiation protection garment, radiation protection glasses and visors. RESULTS: The average dose reduction using radiation protection devices varied between 57.7 and 83.4% (p < 0.05) in comparison with no radiation protection. Some radiation protection glasses and visors showed a significant dose reduction for the eye lenses when the height of the examiner increased. The right eye was partially less protected, especially if the distances between the simulated examiner's head and the scatter object were small. CONCLUSION: All the investigated protection devices showed a significant reduction in radiation exposure to the simulated examiner. For some devices, the radiation dose increased with decreasing distance to the scattering object, especially for the right eye lens.


Subject(s)
Eye Protective Devices , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Protection/methods , Equipment Design , Radiation Dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...