Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Ter ; 167(2): 25-8, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27212568

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The use of inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) may represent a non-invasive method to evaluate the sensory nerve function in the maxillofacial region. The aim of this work is to confirm the feasibility of a technique, previously reported in the literature, and the data previously obtained. MATERIALS AND METHODS: SEPs were obtained following electrical stimulation (square wave pulses 0.2 millisecond [ms] in duration, 4 to 6.5 mA, 0.7/second repetition rate, 200 averages) of the gum at the mental foramen level, in the IAN region, via a new designed type of intraoral surface electrodes and recorded from the contralateral central scalp sites. RESULTS: We recognized waveforms of sufficient quality and consistently recorded a "W"-shaped response. Peak latencies of waves were at 14, 20, 27, 34 and 43 ms respectively. One side of the lower lip can be compared with the contralateral side. CONCLUSIONS: IAN SEPs, obtained with the present technique, may represent an objective, non-invasive, and reliable way of testing sensory nerve function in the maxillofacial region.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology , Face/innervation , Mandibular Nerve/physiology , Electric Stimulation , Humans
2.
Eur J Pain ; 16(10): 1389-97, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22438237

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To investigate changes in heat pain threshold and modifications in heat pain processing during pregnancy and labour, seventy-six nulliparous pregnant women were enrolled in two studies. METHODS: In the first study (psychophysical), 60 pregnant women underwent a quantitative sensory testing (QST) investigating heat perception in two body areas (right forearm and T10 dermatome) according to these groups: 32-33 gestational weeks (GW), 39-40 GW, early stage of active labour and 24 h after the delivery. In the other study (neurophysiological), contact heat-evoked potentials (CHEPs) were recorded in other 16 women at the 32nd GW and in 11 of these also at the 40th GW. RESULTS: The psychophysical study showed that heat pain threshold was significantly increased at the forearm at 32-33 GW (median ± IQR: 39.6 ± 0.7 °C), at 39-40 GW (40.6 ± 1.1 °C) and at early stage of active labour (40.8 ± 1.5 °C) as compared to 20 non-pregnant controls (p < 0.001). Heat pain threshold tested at T10 level was significantly increased at 32-33 GW (41.0 ± 1.6 °C), at 39-40 GW (42.1 ± 1.8 °C), and at early stage of active labour (42.3 ± 1.3 °C) as compared to the non-pregnant women (p < 0.001). The N2-P2 CHEP amplitude (main negative N2 and positive P2 components of the vertex biphasic potential) recorded from the pregnant women was significantly lower at the 40th than at the 32nd GW, after stimulation of both the forearm (p < 0.001) and the abdomen (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In pregnant women, there is a progressive increase of heat pain threshold and a reduction of the CHEP amplitude, suggesting that a general inhibitory mechanism may be involved.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology , Pain Perception/physiology , Pain Threshold/physiology , Pregnancy/physiology , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Hot Temperature , Humans , Labor Stage, First/physiology , Postpartum Period/physiology , Pregnancy Trimester, Third/physiology
3.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 122(12): 2469-74, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21601514

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the presence of multiple spinothalamic pathways for warmth in the human spinal cord. METHODS: Laser evoked potentials to C-fiber stimulation (C-LEPs) were recorded in 15 healthy subjects after warmth stimulation of the dorsal midline at C5, T2, T6, and T10 vertebral levels. This method allowed us to calculate the spinal conduction velocity (CV) in two different ways: (1) the reciprocal of the slope of the regression line was obtained from the latencies of the different C-LEP components, and (2) the distance between C5 and T10 was divided by the latency difference of the responses at the two sites. In particular, we considered the C-N1 potential, generated in the second somatosensory (SII) area, and the late C-P2 response, generated in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). RESULTS: The calculated CV of the spinal fibers generating the C-N1 potential (around 2.5m/s) was significantly different (p<0.01) from the one of the pathway producing the P2 response (around 1.4m/s). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the C-N1 and the C-P2 components are generated by two parallel spinal pathways. SIGNIFICANCE: Warmth sensation is subserved by parallel spinothalamic pathways, one probably reaching the SII area, the other the ACC.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory/physiology , Spinothalamic Tracts/physiology , Thermosensing/physiology , Adult , Female , Hot Temperature , Humans , Male , Somatosensory Cortex/physiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...