Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
G E N ; 45(1): 1-8, 1991.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1843678

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Evaluation of the fine needle aspiration cytology guided by ultrasonography in the diagnosis of abdominal and retroperitoneal tumors. DESIGN: Transversal study of diagnostic standard-criterion test. PLACE: Ultrasonographic Unity Digestive Disease Department. Hospital Oncológico Padre Machado. SAMPLE: 98 patients with intraabdominal and retroperitoneal lesions. INTERVENTION: Fine needle aspiration cytology guided by Ultrasonography. INDICE TEST: Laparoscopy and/or laparotomy. MEASUREMENTS: Estimation of sensibility (S), Specificity (E), Efficacy (Ef), positive predictive value (VPP), negative predictive value (VPN), measure of false positives (TFP) and measure of false negatives (TFN) by diagnosis method. RESULTS: VP: 81%; VN: 12%; FP: 1%; FN: 6%; S: 93%; E: 92.3%; Ef.: 97%; VPP: 98.7%; VPN: 66%; TFP: 1.25%; Benign lesions: 22.5%; Malignancy lesions: 65.5%; non lesions: 12%; complications: severe: 1%, non significance: 5%. CONCLUSIONS: Fine needle aspiration cytology guided by ultrasound has high sensibility, specificity, efficacy, with low value of false positive. However, it has high incidence of false negatives and negative predictive value. We recommend diagnostic procedures when the suspicion of tumor is high did the cytology is negative.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries/pathology , Biopsy, Needle/methods , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/pathology , Abdominal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy, Needle/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Retroperitoneal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL