Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e083046, 2024 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777590

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent arthritis type and a leading cause of chronic mobility disability. While pain medications provide only symptomatic pain relief; growing evidence suggests pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS) is chondroprotective and could have anti-inflammatory effects in knee OA. This study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of oral PPS in symptomatic knee OA with dyslipidaemia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: MaRVeL is a phase II, single-centre, parallel, superiority trial which will be conducted at Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia. 92 participants (46 per arm) aged 40 and over with painful knee OA and mild to moderate structural change on X-ray (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 or 3) will be recruited from the community and randomly allocated to receive two cycles of either oral PPS or placebo for 5 weeks starting at baseline and week 11. Primary outcome will be the 16-week change in overall average knee pain severity measured using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale. Main secondary outcomes include change in knee pain, patient global assessment, physical function, quality of life and other structural changes. A biostatistician blinded to allocation groups will perform the statistical analysis according to the intention-to-treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the NSLHD Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (2021/ETH00315). All participants will provide written informed consent online. Study results will be disseminated through conferences, social media and academic publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12621000654853); U1111-1265-3750.


Subject(s)
Dyslipidemias , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Pentosan Sulfuric Polyester , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Pentosan Sulfuric Polyester/therapeutic use , Pentosan Sulfuric Polyester/administration & dosage , Dyslipidemias/drug therapy , Dyslipidemias/complications , Quality of Life , Male , Treatment Outcome , Female , Middle Aged , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Australia , Pain Measurement , Adult
2.
Osteoarthr Cartil Open ; 5(2): 100343, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36879559

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS, Elmiron®) for dyslipidaemia and knee osteoarthritis (OA) related symptoms. Method: This was a single-arm, open-label, prospective, non-randomised pilot study. People with painful knee OA and a history of primary hypercholesterolemia were included. PPS was taken orally in a dosage of 10 â€‹mg/kg once every 4 days for 5 weeks for two cycles. There was 5 weeks of no medication between the cycles. The main outcomes included the change in lipidemia levels, the change in knee OA-related symptoms assessed by pain numerical rating scale (NRS) and Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and knee MRI semi-quantitative score. The changes were analysed using paired t-tests. Results: 38 participants were included, with a mean age of 62.2 years. We found a statistically significant decrease in total cholesterol (from 6.23 â€‹± â€‹0.74 to 5.95 â€‹± â€‹0.77 â€‹mmol/L; P â€‹= â€‹0.01) and low-density lipoprotein (from 4.03 â€‹± â€‹0.61 to 3.82 â€‹± â€‹0.61 â€‹mmol/L; P â€‹= â€‹0.009) from baseline to week 16. Knee pain NRS was significantly reduced at weeks 6, 16 and 26 from 6.39 â€‹± â€‹1.33 to 4.18 â€‹± â€‹1.99, 3.63 â€‹± â€‹2.28 and 4.38 â€‹± â€‹2.55, respectively (P â€‹< â€‹0.001). However, there was no significant difference in terms of the primary outcome of triglyceride levels before and after treatment. The most common AEs were positive faecal occult blood tests, followed by headache and diarrhoea. Conclusion: The findings suggest that PPS has promising effects on improving dyslipidaemia and symptomatic pain relief in people with knee OA.

3.
Clin J Sport Med ; 32(3): e243-e250, 2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34516433

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether a hip brace can improve hip health quality-of-life (QoL) and is well-tolerated in people with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) or symptomatic labral tears after 6 weeks of wear. DESIGN: Parallel, two-arm, exploratory randomized trial. SETTING: Hospital and private clinics of orthopaedic surgeons. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals >18 years with FAIS or labral tears. INTERVENTIONS: Usual conservative care versus usual conservative care plus a hip brace. MAIN OUTCOMES: Patient-reported outcomes were assessed with the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33), and Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Scores (HAGOS). Brace acceptability was measured using the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology survey. Independent t-tests assessed between-group differences. RESULTS: Thirty-eight participants were recruited, 19 each group, 60% women, mean age 39.3 ± 11.8 years, body mass index 25.3 ± 4.4 kg/m2, iHOT-33 36.6 ± 24.8. Three participants dropped out (one usual care, 2 braced). The mean between-group difference for iHOT-33 was 19.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68-37.06, P = 0.03) favoring the brace. There were improvements in most HAGOS subscale scores favoring the brace. Issues with brace tolerability for some participants were perceived comfort and effectiveness. Three brace-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Between-group differences favored the braced group for hip health QoL, pain, symptoms, and function. Although these were promising results, the CIs for the estimates were wide, the small sample size likely a contributing factor. Our results suggest that further investigation of the brace is warranted, we calculated sample sizes and made recommendations for the design of a future trial.


Subject(s)
Femoracetabular Impingement , Hip Injuries , Adult , Arthroscopy/methods , Female , Femoracetabular Impingement/diagnosis , Hip Injuries/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome
4.
BMJ Open ; 11(11): e056382, 2021 11 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34845081

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a highly prevalent disabling joint disease. Intra-articular stem cell therapy is increasingly being used for treating KOA with little high-quality evidence to support its use. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells (Cymerus MSCs) for treating symptomatic tibiofemoral KOA and improving knee structure over 24 months. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Stem Cell injections for symptomatic relief and strUctural improvement in people with Tibiofemoral knee OsteoaRthritis study is a phase III, multi-centre, parallel, superiority, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, which will be conducted in Sydney and Hobart, Australia. 440 participants (220 per arm) aged over 40 years with painful KOA and mild to moderate structural change on X-ray (Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 or 3) with medial minimum joint space width between 1 and 4 mm in the study knee will be recruited from the community and randomly allocated to receive either intra-articular MSCs or saline at baseline, week 3 and week 52. The coprimary outcomes will be the proportion of participants achieving patient-acceptable symptom state for knee pain at 24 months and quantitative central medial femorotibial compartment cartilage thickness change from baseline to 24 months. Main secondary outcomes include change in knee pain, Patient Global Assessment, physical function, quality of life and other structural changes. Additional data for cost-effectiveness analysis will also be recorded. Adverse events will be monitored throughout the study. The primary analysis will be conducted using modified intention-to-treat. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by The University of Sydney (USYD) Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) #: 2020/119 and The University of Tasmania (UTAS) HREC #: H0021868. All participants will be required to provide informed consent. Dissemination will occur through conferences, social media, and scientific publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000870954); U1111-1234-4897.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis, Knee , Aged , Australia , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Osteoarthritis, Knee/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Stem Cells , Treatment Outcome
5.
BMJ Open ; 10(2): e035672, 2020 02 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32075845

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hand osteoarthritis (HOA) is a highly prevalent disabling joint disease. The current management regimens are limited. Potentially as a consequence, many people turn to complementary and alternative medicines for symptomatic relief. A combination of two or more supplements is common in clinical practice; however, evidence for the efficacy of this approach is lacking. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of a supplement combination for treating symptomatic HOA in comparison to placebo. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The RADIANT study is an internet-based, parallel, superiority, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, two-arm clinical trial. A participatory design is used to facilitate the study procedures. One hundred and six participants aged over 40 years with painful HOA and structural change on X-ray (Kellgren and Lawrence grade (KLG) ≥2) will be recruited from the community and randomly allocated to receive either a supplement combination composed of: (1) combined supplement containing Boswellia serrata extract, pine bark extract and methylsulfonylmethane and (2) curcumin or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary outcome will be 12-week change in hand pain on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Main secondary outcomes include adverse events, change in hand function, patient global assessment of disease activity and quality of life. A range of additional measures will be recorded, and an individual patient placebo response will be performed. The primary analysis will be conducted using an intention-to-treat approach. Adverse events will be monitored weekly throughout the study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC No. 2018/766). Dissemination will occur through conferences, social media, scientific publications and PhD thesis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619000835145); Pre-results.


Subject(s)
Curcumin/therapeutic use , Dimethyl Sulfoxide/therapeutic use , Hand/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Pain Management , Plant Preparations/therapeutic use , Sulfones/therapeutic use , Australia , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Internet , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...