Methotrexate in the therapeutic pathway of patients with psoriasis. Analysis of clinical practice data and comparison with guidelines.

Psoriasis is an inflammatory skin disease with a chronic-relapsing course. It is estimated that the prevalence in Italy is 3%. An adequate model of taking care of the patient with psoriasis allows the patient to benefit from the most suitable treatment option for his health needs. In this position statement the observations, criticalities and proposals for improvement of the Pso-Path Working Group, composed by health economists, clinicians and patients, on the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway of the patient with psoriasis have been collected. In particular, the deviation of clinical practice from the current Guidelines for the management of patients with psoriasis, which recommend the use of biologic drugs in case of non-response, intolerance or contraindication to Methotrexate or Cyclosporine, was evaluated. A Working Group was convened whose participants were asked to express their thoughts on the diagnostic and therapeutic pathway of the patient with psoriasis, bringing out critical elements and proposals for improvement, based on their experiences. This position statement summarizes the experiences and consensus between clinicians and patients on actions to optimize the management of patients with psoriasis undergoing biological treatment. Compared to the epidemiological data currently available, it is believed that only a small percentage of patients with psoriasis are treated with systemic drugs. The perception of clinicians, according to their experience, confirms the data emerging from the National Report "National Observatory on the Use of Medicines" (Osmed) compiled by AIFA in 2015, according to which more than 77% of patients with psoriasis are started to treatment with biological drugs without a previous use of Methotrexate or Cyclosporine for at least 3 months. The Pso-Path Working Group concluded that it would be desirable to incentivize, through the formalization of regional guidelines, the creation of a network system that promotes not only a greater awareness, at the territorial level, of the importance and impact of the disease and the possible paths, but also the collaboration and connection between all the actors involved in the overall care of the patient.

Non steroid treatment for eczema: results from a controlled and randomized study.

AIM: This study assesses the efficacy of a new non steroid anti-inflammatory product in comparison to Hydrocortisone Butyrate 0.1% Cream in healing eczematous dermatitis. METHODS: A bilateral controlled randomized pilot study was conducted in Italian adults affected by eczema with at least two symmetric lesions at baseline, respectively assigned to a non steroid cream or Hydrocortisone. The severity of lesions was judged through the Global Clinical Score (GCS) and the recovery was defined as a GSC equal to 0. The study investigated: 1) the differences in GCS between four points in time during therapy (baseline, four, eight, twelve weeks), according to medication received; 2) treatment efficacy. RESULTS: The study showed that time, treatment and interaction between treatment and time were associated with GCS; moreover, lesions treated with Hydrocortisone went better on the whole but the post-hoc analysis showed a significant clinical improving at each point in time only for the non steroid cream. At the end of the study, in the intention to treat analysis, lesions recovered in 76.1% and 40.3% patients treated with Hydrocortisone and with the non steroid cream respectively; in the per protocol population, recovery was achieved in 91.7% and 58.3% of cases. CONCLUSION: According to the results, the non steroid cream has been demonstrated effective in reducing the severity of eczema and may be used with continuing success in the long term treatment of the disease.

Multiple eruptive dermatofibromas in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with prednisone.

Solitary dermatofibromas are a common occurrence, especially on the lower limbs of young women, while multiple dermatofibromas (MDF) are rare, accounting for less than 0.3% of all dermatofibromas and may suddenly develop in immunosuppressed patients. We report a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who developed MDF while she was taking oral prednisone. A 46-year-old woman presented in 1989 complaining of photosensitivity, arthralgias, fatigue, malaise and dyspepsia. The patient denied fever, Raynaud's phenomenon, oral ulcer and hair loss. On examination she presented a typical SLE malar rash. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was elevated (54 mm/h). Speckle patterned IgG/IgM antinuclear antibodies were present at 1/1280 titer. Antibodies anti Ro/SSA were detected by counterimmunelectrophoresis up to 1/8 titer. Other laboratory findings were negative or within normal limits. Systemic lupus erythematosus was diagnosed and the patient given 50 mg/day prednisone. After a few months, both clinical symptoms and immunologic parameters improved. Eighteen months later, prednisone was replaced by 500 mg/day hydroxychloroquine. In 1994, she presented again with malar rash, arthralgias and facial hyperpigmentation. Prednisone 15 mg/day was reintroduced and hydroxychloroquine stopped being a possible cause of the facial hyperpigmented macules. In 1996, while she was taking 5 mg/day prednisone, several nodules developed on her limbs within a few months. On examination we observed 16 firm, slightly elevated 3-15-mm wide brown nodules on her arms, legs and trunk. A biopsy specimen of a lesion of the trunk revealed an epidermal seborrheic-keratosis-like hyperplasia with dermal fibrosis and fibroblastic proliferation (Fig. 1). Dermatofibroma was diagnosed.

Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of oral terbinafine (Daskil) in patients with seborrhoeic dermatitis. A multicentre, randomized, investigator-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous uncontrolled trials have suggested that oral terbinafine, an antimycotic allylamine compound, could be useful in the treatment of seborrhoeic dermatitis. OBJECTIVES: To investigate in a placebo-controlled trial the clinical efficacy of oral terbinafine (Daskil(R), Mipharm, Milan, Italy) in patients with moderate to severe seborrhoeic dermatitis. METHODS: Sixty outpatients (mean +/- SD age 37 +/- 11 years; 32 men and 28 women) with moderate to severe seborrhoeic dermatitis were enrolled in a multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled, investigator-blinded, parallel-group, 12-week study. After a 2-week wash-out period, enrolled patients were randomized to treatment with oral terbinafine 250 mg daily (n = 30) or placebo (moisturizing ointment) (n = 30) applied twice daily for 4 weeks (weeks 0-4). Patients were followed up for an additional 8 weeks after completion of treatment and were clinically evaluated at weeks 0, 2, 4 and 12 by an investigator unaware of the patient's type of treatment. The primary end-point of the study was clinical evaluation of erythema, scaling and itching, each scored on a 0-3 scale. A global clinical score, representing the sum of each evaluated symptom, was also calculated. RESULTS: Demographic and clinical data were equally balanced between the placebo and terbinafine groups. All enrolled patients concluded the study. At baseline, the mean +/- SD global clinical score was 7.4 +/- 1.3 in the placebo group and 7.7 +/- 1.0 in the terbinafine-treated group. At weeks 4 and 12 the mean +/- SD global clinical score in the placebo group was 5.9 +/- 1.7 and 6.3 +/- 1.2, respectively, which was not significantly different from baseline. As compared with baseline values and the placebo group, terbinafine treatment significantly (P < 0.0001, Tukey-Kramer test) reduced the mean +/- SD global clinical score (to 1.0 +/- 1.1 at week 4, and 1.2 +/- 1.4 at week 12), as well as the individual erythema, scaling and itching scores. No serious adverse events were recorded during the study in either group. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first controlled trial that has shown oral terbinafine to be effective in the treatment of moderate to severe seborrhoeic dermatitis. Clinical improvement following 4 weeks treatment with terbinafine was maintained 8 weeks after completing treatment.