Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Herbal Formulations of Septilin and Triphala with Conventional 2% Chlorhexidine on Root Canal and Oral Commensal Bacteria using Kirby Bauer Method: An in-vitro Study.

Background: Endodontic flareups are always very difficult to treat because of reasons like drug resistance previously sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine have been used in the literature but with advancements newer materials like herbal products have been tried for this purpose. Thus, present vitro study was conducted to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of herbal formulations on commensals of oral cavity and root canal. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine 2%, Septilin and Triphala wer evaluated with the help of Kirby Bauer test. The microorganisms used were Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. The samples were placed in standardized wells and were subjected to incubation. Subsequently zones of inhibition were measured with the help of a caliper. One-factor analysis of variance, Tukey's least significant difference post hoc test and Student's independent t-test were performed to find a significant difference (P < 0.05) in the two groups. Results: For chlorhexidine in S. aureus mean antibacterial efficacy was 11.10 ± 1.25 and in E. coli 10.0 ± 1.33. The value for S. aureus was lesser in Triphala with a value of 10.35 ± 1.63 and in E. coli mean value was 9.05 ± 1.27. For Septilin the mean for S. aureus was 10.40 ± 1.04, and the mean antibacterial efficacy in E. coli was 9.65 ± 1.38. Conclusion: Septilin and Triphala showed remarkable efficacy concerning zones of inhibition. These herbal formulations have tremendous potential to be used as adjuncts to traditional disinfection modalities though it has scope of further research.

Comparative Assessment of Clinical and Quality of Life Outcomes in Mandibular Angle Fractures Treated with Standard and Three-Dimensional Mini-Plates.

Aims and Objectives: To undertake a multidimensional comparative assessment of the standard and three dimensional (3D) mini-plates in managing isolated mandibular angle fractures (MAFs). Patients and Methods: Thirty-six subjects were divided equally into two groups. Group A underwent fixation with a standard 2 mm miniplate, while group B with 2 mm 3D mini-plates. Evaluations were done preoperatively (T0), postoperatively at one week (T1), one month (T2) and three months (T3). Maximal inter-incisal mouth opening (MIO) and mean bite force (MBF) at the central incisors, right and left molars were calculated. Postoperative complications and Quality of life (QoL) outcomes were evaluated using the short form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Results: Mean operative time was almost similar for both groups. Although mean MIO improved significantly from T1 to T3 in both groups, intergroup comparison of MIO was not significant. The MBF values were significantly higher in group B on the right and left molars at T2 and T3. Although significant improvement in OHIP-14 scores was seen from T2 to T3 in both the groups, intergroup comparison of OHIP was not significant. Conclusion: 3D plates demonstrated similar clinical and QoL outcomes compared to the standard mini-plates.