Low absolute risk of thrombotic and cardiovascular events in outpatient pregnant women with COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Pregnancy may contribute to an excess risk of thrombotic or cardiovascular events. COVID-19 increases the risk of these events, although the risk is relatively limited among outpatients. We sought to determine whether outpatient pregnant women with COVID-19 are at a high risk for cardiovascular or thrombotic events. MATERIALS & METHODS: We analyzed pregnant outpatients with COVID-19 from the multicenter CORONA-VTE-Network registry. The main study outcomes were a composite of adjudicated venous or arterial thrombotic events, and a composite of adjudicated cardiovascular events. Events were assessed 90 days after the COVID-19 diagnosis and reported for non-pregnant women ≤45 years, and for men ≤45 years, as points of reference. RESULTS: Among 6585 outpatients, 169 were pregnant at diagnosis. By 90-day follow-up, two pregnant women during the third trimester had lower extremity venous thrombosis, one deep and one superficial vein thrombosis. The cumulative incidence of thrombotic events was 1.20 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.0 to 2.84 %). Respective rates were 0.47 % (95 % CI: 0.14 % to 0.79 %) among non-pregnant women, and 0.49 % (95 % CI: 0.06 % to 0.91 %) among men ≤45 years. No non-thrombotic cardiovascular events occurred in pregnant women. The rates of cardiovascular events were 0.53 % (95 % CI: 0.18 to 0.87) among non-pregnant women, and 0.68 % (95 % CI: 0.18 to 1.18) in men aged ≤45 years. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombotic and cardiovascular events are rare among outpatients with COVID-19. Although a higher event rate among outpatient pregnant women cannot be excluded, the absolute event rates are low and do not warrant population-wide cardiovascular interventions to optimize outcomes.

Outcomes of outflow graft stenting in HeartMate 3 left ventricular assist devices: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: LVAD outflow graft stenosis continues to remain prevalent with a high complication rate. We sought to pool the existing evidence on indications, utilization patterns, and outcomes of transcatheter interventions for outflow graft stenosis in the HeartMate 3 LVAD. METHODS: An electronic search was performed to identify all studies in the English literature reporting on HeartMate 3 LVAD outflow graft stenting. Patient-level data were extracted for analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen published reports and one unpublished case comprising a total of 28 patients were included. Median patient age was 68.5 years [Interquartile range: 58, 71] and 25.9% (7/27) were female. Dyspnea [60.7% (17/28)] was the most common presenting symptom. Low flow alarms were present in 60% (15/25) of patients. Findings included external compression [35.7% (10/28)], graft twist [21.4% (6/28)], graft twist and external compression [14.3% (4.28)], intraluminal thrombus [10.7% (3/28)], graft twist and intraluminal thrombus [3.6% (1/28)], and pseudoaneurysm of outflow graft [3.6% (1/28)]. Median time from LVAD implantation to stenting was 2.1 years [1.4, 3]. Immediate flow normalization after stenting was observed in 85.7% (24/28). The 30-day mortality was 12% (3/25). Overall mortality was 12% (3/25) at a median follow-up of 3.9 months [1, 17]. CONCLUSION: Outflow graft stenting in the HeartMate 3 LVAD appears to be a reasonable treatment option for outflow graft stenosis, with low overall rates of complications and mortality. Further refinement of indications and approaches may improve outcomes.

Evaluation of Intracardiac Pressures Using Subharmonic-aided Pressure Estimation with Sonazoid Microbubbles.

Purpose To investigate if the right ventricular (RV) systolic and left ventricular (LV) diastolic pressures can be obtained noninvasively using the subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) technique with Sonazoid microbubbles. Materials and Methods Individuals scheduled for a left and/or right heart catheterization were prospectively enrolled in this institutional review board-approved clinical trial from 2017 to 2020. A standard-of-care catheterization procedure was performed by advancing fluid-filled pressure catheters into the LV and aorta (n = 25) or RV (n = 22), and solid-state high-fidelity pressure catheters into the LV and aorta in a subset of participants (n = 18). Study participants received an infusion of Sonazoid microbubbles (GE HealthCare), and SHAPE data were acquired using a validated interface developed on a SonixTablet (BK Medical) US scanner, synchronously with the pressure catheter data. A conversion factor, derived using cuff-based pressure measurements with a SphygmoCor XCEL PWA (ATCOR) and subharmonic signal from the aorta, was used to convert the subharmonic signal into pressure values. Errors between the pressure measurements obtained using the SHAPE technique and pressure catheter were compared. Results The mean errors in pressure measurements obtained with the SHAPE technique relative to those of the fluid-filled pressure catheter were 1.6 mm Hg ± 1.5 [SD] (P = .85), 8.4 mm Hg ± 6.2 (P = .04), and 7.4 mm Hg ± 5.7 (P = .09) for RV systolic, LV minimum diastolic, and LV end-diastolic pressures, respectively. Relative to the measurements with the solid-state high-fidelity pressure catheter, the mean errors in LV minimum diastolic and LV end-diastolic pressures were 7.2 mm Hg ± 4.5 and 6.8 mm Hg ± 3.3 (P ≥ .44), respectively. Conclusion These results indicate that SHAPE with Sonazoid may have the potential to provide clinically relevant RV systolic and LV diastolic pressures. Keywords: Ultrasound-Contrast, Cardiac, Aorta, Left Ventricle, Right Ventricle ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.: NCT03245255 © RSNA, 2024.

Outcomes of Patients Transferred to Tertiary Care Centers for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Consensus recommendations for cardiogenic shock (CS) advise transfer of patients in need of advanced options beyond the capability of "spoke" centers to tertiary/"hub" centers with higher capabilities. However, outcomes associated with such transfers are largely unknown beyond those reported in individual health networks. OBJECTIVES: To analyze a contemporary, multicenter CS cohort with the aim of comparing characteristics and outcomes of patients between transfer (between spoke and hub centers) and nontransfer cohorts (those primarily admitted to a hub center) for both acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) and heart failure-related HF-CS. We also aim to identify clinical characteristics of the transfer cohort that are associated with in-hospital mortality. METHODS: The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group (CSWG) registry is a national, multicenter, prospective registry including high-volume (mostly hub) CS centers. Fifteen U.S. sites contributed data for this analysis from 2016-2020. RESULTS: Of 1890 consecutive CS patients enrolled into the CSWG registry, 1028 (54.4%) patients were transferred. Of these patients, 528 (58.1%) had heart failure-related CS (HF-CS), and 381 (41.9%) had CS related to acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS). Upon arrival to the CSWG site, transfer patients were more likely to be in SCAI stages C and D, when compared to nontransfer patients. Transfer patients had higher mortality rates (37% vs 29%, < 0.001) than nontransfer patients; the differences were driven primarily by the HF-CS cohort. Logistic regression identified increasing age, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and higher number of vasoactive drugs prior to or within 24 hours after CSWG site transfer as independent predictors of mortality among HF-CS patients. Conversely, pulmonary artery catheter use prior to transfer or within 24 hours of arrival was associated with decreased mortality rates. Among transfer AMI-CS patients, BMI > 28 kg/m2, worsening renal failure, lactate > 3 mg/dL, and increasing numbers of vasoactive drugs were associated with increased mortality rates. CONCLUSION: More than half of patients with CS managed at high-volume CS centers were transferred from another hospital. Although transfer patients had higher mortality rates than those who were admitted primarily to hub centers, the outcomes and their predictors varied significantly when classified by HF-CS vs AMI-CS.

Major cardiovascular events after COVID-19, event rates post-vaccination, antiviral or anti-inflammatory therapy, and temporal trends: Rationale and methodology of the CORONA-VTE-Network study.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with excess risk of cardiovascular and thrombotic events in the early post-infection period and during convalescence. Despite the progress in our understanding of cardiovascular complications, uncertainty persists with respect to more recent event rates, temporal trends, association between vaccination status and outcomes, and findings within vulnerable subgroups such as older adults (aged 65 years or older), or those undergoing hemodialysis. Sex-informed findings, including results among pregnant and breastfeeding women, as well as adjusted comparisons between male and female adults are similarly understudied. METHODS: Adult patients, aged ≥18 years, with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 who received inpatient or outpatient care at the participating centers of the registry are eligible for inclusion. A total of 10,000 patients have been included in this multicenter study, with Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, MA) serving as the coordinating center. Other sites include Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Anne Arundel Medical Center, University of Virginia Medical Center, University of Colorado Health System, and Thomas Jefferson University Health System. Data elements will be ascertained manually for accuracy. The two main outcomes are 1) a composite of venous or arterial thrombotic events, and 2) a composite of major cardiovascular events, defined as venous or arterial thrombosis, myocarditis or heart failure with inpatient treatment, new atrial fibrillation/flutter, or cardiovascular death. Clinical outcomes are adjudicated by independent physicians. Vaccination status and time of inclusion in the study will be ascertained for subgroup-specific analyses. Outcomes are pre-specified to be reported separately for hospitalized patients versus those who were initially receiving outpatient care. Outcomes will be reported at 30-day and 90-day follow-up. Data cleaning at the sites and the data coordinating center and outcomes adjudication process are in-progress. CONCLUSIONS: The CORONA-VTE-Network study will share contemporary information related to rates of cardiovascular and thrombotic events in patients with COVID-19 overall, as well as within key subgroups, including by time of inclusion, vaccination status, patients undergoing hemodialysis, the elderly, and sex-informed analyses such as comparison of women and men, or among pregnant and breastfeeding women.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Cardiac Amyloidosis and Aortic Stenosis.

Aortic stenosis (AS) and cardiac amyloidosis (CA) occur concomitantly in a significant number of patients and portend a higher risk of all-cause mortality. Previous studies have investigated outcomes in patients with concomitant CA/AS who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus medical therapy alone, but no evidence-based consensus regarding the ideal management of these patients has been established. Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Methodologic bias was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies. A total of 4 observational studies comprising 83 patients were included. Of these, 45 patients (54%) underwent TAVI, whereas 38 (46%) were managed conservatively. Of the 3 studies that included baseline characteristics by treatment group, 30% were women. The risk of all-cause mortality was found to be significantly lower in patients who underwent TAVI than those treated with conservative medical therapy alone (odds ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.08 to 0.73). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with CA with AS who underwent TAVI than those managed with medical therapy alone.

Noninvasive Evaluation of Cardiac Chamber Pressures Using Subharmonic-Aided Pressure Estimation With Definity Microbubbles.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive and accurate assessment of intracardiac pressures has remained an elusive goal of noninvasive cardiac imaging. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate if errors in intracardiac pressures obtained noninvasively using contrast microbubbles and the subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) technique are <5 mm Hg. METHODS: In a nonrandomized institutional review board-approved clinical trial (NCT03243942), patients scheduled for a left-sided and/or right-sided heart catheterization procedure and providing written informed consent were included. A standard-of-care catheterization procedure was performed advancing clinically used pressure catheters into the left and/or right ventricles and/or the aorta. After pressure catheter placement, patients received an infusion of Definity microbubbles (n = 56; 2 vials diluted in 50 mL of saline; infusion rate: 4-10 mL/min) (Lantheus Medical Imaging). Then SHAPE data was acquired using a validated interface developed on a SonixTablet scanner (BK Medical Systems) synchronously with the pressure catheter data. A conversion factor (mm Hg/dB) was derived from SHAPE data and measurements with a SphygmoCor XCEL PWA device (ATCOR Medical) and was combined with SHAPE data from the left and/or the right ventricles to obtain clinically relevant systolic and diastolic ventricular pressures. RESULTS: The mean value of absolute errors for left ventricular minimum and end diastolic pressures were 2.9 ± 2.0 and 1.7 ± 1.2 mm Hg (n = 26), respectively, and for right ventricular systolic pressures was 2.2 ± 1.5 mm Hg (n = 11). Two adverse events occurred during Definity infusion; both were resolved. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the SHAPE technique with Definity microbubbles is encouragingly efficacious for obtaining intracardiac pressures noninvasively and accurately. (Noninvasive, Subharmonic Intra-Cardiac Pressure Measurement; NCT03243942).

Microaxial circulatory support for percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Microaxial circulatory support devices have been used to support patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMICS). The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to pool and analyze the existing evidence on the baseline characteristics, periprocedural data, and outcomes of microaxial support before and after PCI in AMICS. METHODS: An electronic database search was performed to identify all cohort studies on Impella and PCI for cardiogenic shock in the English language. A total of five articles comprising 543 patients were included. These patients received microaxial support either before (pre-PCI) or after (post-PCI) undergoing PCI. Comparative analyses were done between both groups. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 66 years [95% Confidence Interval (58-74)], and 22% (89/396) of patients were female. ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (MI) comprised 64% (44-80) of MIs and 50% (44-56) of MIs involved the left anterior descending artery. The mean number of diseased vessels was 2.21 (1.62-2.80). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 31% (23.4-38.6). The mean arterial pressure was 66.3 mm Hg (54.1-78.5). Mean serum lactate [6.1 mmol/L (3.3-8.9)] and serum creatinine [1.4 mg/dl (1.0-1.7)] were similar between groups. 30-day mortality was lower in the pre-PCI group [41% (34%-49%)] compared to the post-PCI group [61% (42%-77%), p < 0.01]. Pooled Kaplan-Meier analysis showed better early survival in the pre-PCI group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients presenting with AMICS were similar at baseline in both pre-PCI and post-PCI groups. Nevertheless, pre-PCI group showed better early survival compared to post-PCI group.

Trends and Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease: Insights From the National Readmissions Database.

Due to shared risk factors, many patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) also have concomitant peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The readmission rates and long term clinical outcomes of these patients following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in a large sample has not been well defined. The National Readmissions Database (NRD) (2015-2019) was used to identify patients undergoing TAVI. TAVI in patients with PAD was compared with those without PAD using a propensity score matched (PSM) analysis to obtain adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) of net adverse clinical events (NACE), and its components. A total of 189,216 patients were identified, of which 14,925 patients (7386 with PAD, 7539 without PAD) were selected for adjusted analysis. Using PSM, patients with PAD undergoing TAVI had significantly higher in-hospital adjusted odds of NACE (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.36-1.88), and mortality (aOR 4.10, 95% CI 2.88-5.83). However, rates of other in-hospital peri procedural complications (stroke, major bleeding, paravalvular leak, cardiogenic shock) were not significantly different. There was no significant difference in the incidence of NACE, mortality, or other complications between the 2 groups at 30- and 180 days follow-up. Patients with PAD undergoing TAVI have an increased risk of mortality and NACE during the periprocedural period. However, following discharge, there was no statistically significant difference in 30 days and 6 month outcomes of TAVI in this population compared to those without significant PAD.

PCI for acute myocardial infarction in patients with a pre-existing LVAD, does it improve survival?

BACKGROUND: It is well established that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a life-saving procedure for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the general population and is guideline-recommended for both STEMI and NSTEMI. There is little literature regarding its use in patients with a pre-implanted Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) Database to select all US adult patients (>18 years) with an LVAD diagnosed with an AMI divided into two groups; those who received PCI during the hospitalization and those who did not. RESULTS: A total of 3722 LVAD patients with AMI were identified, of these 17% of patients received PCI and 83% did not. After propensity matching of LVAD patients with AMI, there were 626 patients who received PCI and 623 who did not. Of patients receiving PCI, 37.5% had a STEMI while 29.7% of patients who did not receive PCI had STEMI. Rates of kidney injury (36.5% vs. 43.3%, OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94, p = 0.016), sepsis (3.2% vs. 11.4%, OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.15-0.43, p < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (44.1% vs. 50.4%, OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.97, p = 0.03) and mortality (17.4% vs. 28.9%, OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.68, p < 0.001) were all better for patients receiving PCI. Vascular complications (1.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.008) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (1.6% vs. 0, p = 0.004) were both more common in the group receiving PCI. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, patients supported by LVAD with AMI had an elevated risk of mortality compared to generally accepted mortality rates of patients without LVAD. In this analysis PCI was associated with a decreased risk of mortality, cardiogenic shock, and kidney injury while increasing the risk for vascular complications and intracranial hemorrhage.

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus redo surgical mitral valve replacement in patients with failed mitral bioprostheses.

BACKGROUND: Data on the safety of valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement (ViV-TMVR) compared with redo surgical mitral valve replacement (SMVR) in patients with a history of bioprosthetic mitral valve (MV) remain limited. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the in-hospital, 30-day and 6-month readmission outcomes of ViV-TMVR compared with redo-SMVR in a real-world cohort. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmission Database was utilised, analysing data from 2015 to 2019. To determine the adjusted odds ratio (aOR), we used the propensity-matched analysis for major outcomes at index hospitalisation, 30 days, and 6 months during the episode of readmission. RESULTS: A total of 3,691 patients were included, of these, 24.2% underwent ViV-TMVR and 75.8% underwent redo-SMVR. Patients undergoing ViV-TMVR were older with higher rates of comorbidities. The mean length of stay (15 days vs 4 days) and cost of hospitalisation ($76,558 vs $46,743) were significantly higher for redo-SMVR. The rate of in-hospital all-cause mortality was also significantly lower in ViV-TMVR (2.6% vs 7.3%). By contrast, 30-day all-cause mortality during the episode of readmission (aOR 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40-2.55) and all-cause readmission rates (aOR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.66-1.02) were similar between both groups. The incidence of all-cause readmissions at 6 months (aOR 0.83, 95% CI: 0.65-1.05) and all-cause mortality during the episode of readmission at 6 months (aOR 1.84, 95% CI: 0.54-6.36) were also comparable. The utilisation of the ViV-TMVR procedure increased significantly during our study duration, from 5.2% to 36.8%, (ptrend<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: ViV-TMVR is associated with lower odds of in-hospital mortality, complications, and resource utilisation. The all-cause readmissions and 30-day and 6-month mortality during the episode of readmissions were comparable between both groups.

Innovative use of biotrace tempo pacemaker lead following cardiac surgery.

The Tempo® Temporary Pacing Lead is a temporary, transvenous, active fixation pacemaker lead used exclusively in structural heart and electrophysiology procedures since regulatory approval in 2016. We utilized the Tempo lead for four patients undergoing redo-robotic cardiac surgery in which surgical epicardial leads could not be placed. No failure-to-pace events were encountered and patients were able to participate in various levels of physical activity without limitation.

Orifice Areas of Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valves: A Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiographic Study.

BACKGROUND: Accurate expected effective orifice area (EOA) values for balloon-expandable (BE) transcatheter heart valves (THV) are crucial for preventing patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) and assessment of THV function. Currently published reference EOAs, however, are based on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), which may be subject to left ventricular outflow tract diameter underestimation and/or suboptimal THV Doppler interrogation. The objective of this study was to establish reference EOA values for BE THVs on the basis of Doppler and three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). METHODS: Two hundred twelve intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiographic examinations performed during BE THV implantation with optimal postimplantation Doppler and 3D imaging were retrospectively reviewed. Continuity equation-derived EOAs were compared with geometric orifice areas by 3D planimetry (GOA3D). Performance indices (i.e., EOA normalized to valve size) and PPM rates were determined. TTE-based EOAs obtained within 30 days were also calculated in a subset of 170 patients. RESULTS: The average EOA for all BE THV valves (77% SAPIEN 3) was 2.3 ± 0.5 cm2, while the average EOA was 1.6 ± 0.2 cm2 for 20-mm, 2.0 ± 0.2 cm2, for 23-mm, 2.5 ± 0.3 cm2 for 26-mm, and 3.0 ± 0.3 cm2 for 29-mm THV size (P < .001). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated very good agreement between EOA and GOA3D (bias -0.04 ± 0.15 cm2). There were strong correlations between annular area and TEE-based EOA (R = 0.84) and GOA3D (R = 0.87). The mean performance index was 47 ± 5% and was similar for all THV sizes (P = .21). EOAs based on TTE were smaller compared with those based on TEE, while the correlation with annular area (R = 0.67) and agreement with GOA3D (bias -0.26 ± 0.43 cm2) was not as strong. The overall PPM rate was 2% in the TEE cohort and 12% in the TTE cohort. CONCLUSIONS: EOAs for BE THVs based on intraprocedural Doppler and 3D TEE suggest that previously published TTE-based reference values for EOA are underestimated, while PPM rates may be overestimated. Our findings have important clinical implications for preimplantation decision-making and for the evaluation of THV hemodynamics and function during follow-up.

3 Cases of Superior Vena Cava Syndrome Following Percutaneous Right Ventricular Assist Device Placement.

We present 3 cases of superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome following percutaneous right ventricular assist device (RVAD) placement. Each case underscores the importance of early recognition of SVC syndrome in patients with percutaneous RVAD insertion via the internal jugular vein and calls for heightened awareness of device-associated complications. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Percutaneous coronary intervention of totally occluded coronary venous bypass grafts: An exercise in futility?

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of diseased saphenous vein grafts (SVG) continues to pose a clinical challenge. Current PCI guidelines give a class III recommendation against performing PCI on chronically occluded SVG. However, contemporary outcomes after SVG intervention have incrementally improved with distal protection devices, intracoronary vasodilators, drug-eluting stents, and prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy. AIM: To reassess the procedural and long-term outcomes of PCI for totally occluded SVG with contemporary techniques. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at a single university hospital. The study population consisted of 35 consecutive patients undergoing PCI of totally occluded SVG. Post-procedure dual antiplatelet therapy was continued for a minimum of one year and aspirin was continued indefinitely. Clinical outcomes were assessed at a mean follow-up of 1221 ± 1038 d. The primary outcome was freedom from a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) defined as the occurrence of any of the following: death, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat bypass surgery, repeat PCI, or graft reocclusion. RESULTS: The study group included 29 men and 6 women with a mean age of 69 ± 12 years. Diabetes was present in 14 (40%) patients. All patients had Canadian Heart Classification class III or IV angina. Clinical presentation was an acute coronary syndrome in 34 (97%) patients. Mean SVG age was 12 ± 5 years. Estimated duration of occlusion was acute (< 24 h) in 34% of patients, subacute (> 24 h to 30 d) in 26%, and late (> 30 d) in 40%. PCI was initially successful in 29/35 SVG occlusions (83%). Total stent length was 52 ± 35 mm. Intraprocedural complications of distal embolization or no-reflow occurred in 6 (17%) patients. During longer term follow-up, MACE-free survival was only 30% at 3 years and 17% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: PCI of totally occluded SVG can be performed with a high procedural success rate. However, its clinical utility remains limited by poor follow-up outcomes.

Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background As transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) technology expands to healthy and lower-risk populations, the burden and predictors of procedure-related complications including the need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation needs to be identified. Methods and Results Digital databases were systematically searched to identify studies reporting the incidence of PPM implantation after TAVR. A random- and fixed-effects model was used to calculate unadjusted odds ratios (OR) for all predictors. A total of 78 studies, recruiting 31 261 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall, 6212 patients required a PPM, with a mean of 18.9% PPM per study and net rate ranging from 0.16% to 51%. The pooled estimates on a random-effects model indicated significantly higher odds of post-TAVR PPM implantation for men (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.04-1.28); for patients with baseline mobitz type-1 second-degree atrioventricular block (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.64-5.93), left anterior hemiblock (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.09-1.86), bifascicular block (OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.52-4.42), right bundle-branch block (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 2.17-2.83), and for periprocedural atriorventricular block (OR, 4.17; 95% CI, 2.69-6.46). The mechanically expandable valves had 1.44 (95% CI, 1.18-1.76), while self-expandable valves had 1.93 (95% CI, 1.42-2.63) fold higher odds of PPM requirement compared with self-expandable and balloon-expandable valves, respectively. Conclusions Male sex, baseline atrioventricular conduction delays, intraprocedural atrioventricular block, and use of mechanically expandable and self-expanding prosthesis served as positive predictors of PPM implantation in patients undergoing TAVR.