Revolutionizing cancer treatment in India: Evaluating the unmet need, economics, and a roadmap for project implementation of particle therapy.

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to quantitatively assess eligible patients and project the demand for particle therapy facilities in India from 2020 to 2040. In addition, an economic analysis evaluates the financial feasibility of implementing this technology. The study also examines the prospective benefits and challenges of adopting this technology in India. METHODOLOGY: Cancer incidence and projected trends were analyzed for pediatric patients using the Global Childhood Cancer microsimulation model and adult patients using the Globocan data. Economic cost evaluation is performed for large-scale combined particle (carbon and proton-three room fixed-beam), large-scale proton (one gantry and two fixed-beam), and small-scale proton (one gantry) facility. RESULTS: By 2040, the estimated number of eligible patients for particle therapy is projected to reach 161,000, including approximately 14,000 pediatric cases. The demand for particle therapy facilities is projected to rise from 81 to 97 in 2020 to 121 to 146 by 2040. The capital expenditure is estimated to be only 3.7 times that of a standard photon linear accelerator over a 30-year period. Notably, the treatment cost can be reduced to USD 400 to 800 per fraction, substantially lower than that in high-income countries (USD 1000 to 3000 per fraction). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that, in the Indian scenario, all particle therapy models are cost-beneficial and feasible, with large-scale proton therapy being the most suitable. Despite challenges such as limited resources, space, a skilled workforce, referral systems, and patient affordability, it offers substantial benefits. These include the potential to treat many patients and convenient construction and operational costs. An iterative phased implementation strategy can effectively overcome these challenges, paving the way for the successful adoption of particle therapy in India. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In India, the number of eligible patients benefiting from high-precision particle therapy technology is projected to rise till 2040. Despite high upfront costs, our study finds the long-term feasibility of all particle therapy models, potentially offering a substantial reduction in treatment cost compared to high-income countries. Despite challenges, India can succeed with an iterative phased approach.

An experience with simultaneous integrated boost-volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the definitive treatment of head and neck cancer: An Indian data.

Background: There are very few prospective studies comparing simultaneous integrated boost versus sequential boost in the setting of definitive treatment modality of head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC), especially in the Indian scenario. Materials and Methods: We prospectively randomized 50 patients with biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx malignancies, stage T1-3, enlarged node measuring ≤3 cm that are planned for definitive radiotherapy with chemotherapy into either hypo-fractionated simultaneous integrated (Hypo-SIB VMAT) boost arm or conventional (Conv-VMAT) boost arm. Results: Most of the patients were men and aged less than 50 years. Patients with nodal involvement were 76% in Hypo-SIB VMAT and 80% in Conv-VMAT arm. The overall stage group distribution of II, III, and IVA were 16%, 44%, 40%, and 12%, 56%, and 32%, respectively, in both arms. All patients completed the intended treatment in both arms. Overall survival at the end of 2 years was 84% in Hypo-SIB VMAT arm and 80% in the Conv-VMAT arm (P = 0.25); disease-free survival (DFS) was 88% and 72%, respectively (P = 0.12); and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 92% and 84%, respectively (P = 0.38). All the acute and chronic toxicities in both the arms were comparable with no significant difference in any of the toxicities. The average overall treatment time (OTT) in Hypo-SIB VMAT arm is 39.4 days and in Conv-VMAT arm is 50.2 days (P = 0.00001) which is statistically significant. Conclusions: Accelerated Hypo-SIB VMAT has similar response and toxicities as compared to Conv-VMAT in the setting of definitive concurrent chemoradiation of HNSCC patients with the advantage of less OTT, faster treatment delivery, and patient compliance.

Impact of nodal boost irradiation and MR-based brachytherapy on oncologic outcomes in node-positive cervical cancer.

This study aimed to prospectively evaluate the impact of dose-escalated irradiation of nodal metastases on clinical outcomes compared to no boost in patients with node-positive, bulky, locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) undergoing standard chemoradiation and MRI-based brachytherapy. METHODS: This comparative study included 161 patients with node-positive LACC treated with definitive chemoradiation and MRI-based brachytherapy. The prospective Boost arm accrued 71 patients to receive nodal boost either sequentially or simultaneously to an equivalent dose of 60 Gy. The control arm comprised 90 patients treated before this protocol period with no additional nodal boost. RESULT: Baseline patient and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. All patients had at least one tumor dimension >5 cm at presentation, and 31% had para-aortic node involvement. With a median follow-up of 36 months (IQR:19-50.5), the overall 3-year Local control rate was 88.8%. The 3-year Regional control (93% vs. 80%, p = 0.035) was statistically better in the Boost arm. No nodal failure was observed in nodes <3 cc and < 2 cm, even in the No-boost arm. There was no significant difference in Disease-free survival (67.6% vs. 58.9%,p = 0.454) and Overall Survival (78.9% vs. 74.4%,p = 0.87) between the two arms. Incidence of acute or late toxicities did not differ significantly with nodal boost or the boost delivery technique. CONCLUSION: The addition of external radiation nodal boost to standard treatment of high-volume cervical cancer has improved pelvic control with an acceptable rate of toxicities. However, high systemic failures continue to pose a challenge in improving survival outcomes.

Evaluation and evolution of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) for cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) recently has shown excellent clinical outcomes with superior local control and less toxicity. For IGABT, T2W (T2-weighted) MRI is the gold standard. However, studies have shown that target delineation with the same results in uncertainties, poor interobserver variabilities, and low conformity indices for high-risk clinical target volume contours. In this study, we investigate the role of diffusion-weighted imaging-derived apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps to aid in IGABT. We also evaluated ADC from the baseline to brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty selected patients were enrolled for this study, and two MRIs were taken at diagnosis and before brachytherapy. Patients were divided into two groups, Group 1 being patients with parametrial involvement before external beam radiotherapy and no parametrial involvement before brachytherapy. Group 2 included patients with parametrial involvement before external beam radiotherapy and persistent parametrial involvement before brachytherapy. ADC was measured at the center, edge, and 1 cm from the edge. RESULTS: The measured ADC increased from diagnosis to brachytherapy, and this increase was more for the patients in Group 1 than in Group 2. The mean TDadc (diagnosis ADC, center), TEadc (tumor edge ADC diagnosis), and T1cmDadc (1 cm from edge at diagnosis) were 0.884, 1.45, and 1.9 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively. The TBadc (ADC at brachytherapy, center), TEBadc (tumor edge ADC at brachytherapy), and TE1cmBadc (1 cm from edge brachytherapy) were 1.2, 1.8, and 2.3 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively, p-value <0.00001. No abnormal ADC was present outside the high-risk clinical target volume contours. CONCLUSION: MRI-based IGABT using T2W imaging essentially covers all functionally abnormal zones at brachytherapy. Diffusion-weighted imaging, along with ADC maps, should only be used as a supplement for target delineation.

The promise of image-guided brachytherapy of better clinical outcomes in treatment of cervical cancer: Does it deliver? An Indian scenario.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this series is to study the effectiveness of MRI based image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) in Indian patients with cervical cancer who mostly present in later stages with bulky diseases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 151 cervical cancer patients treated at our institution in last four years, with definitive chemoradiation followed by MRI-based brachytherapy were reviewed. With median follow up of 26 months, Kaplan Meier estimates at two years were calculated for local control (LC), pelvic control (PC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Also, severe late sequelae were reported. RESULTS: The patients predominantly presented with locally advanced cervical cancer in FIGO stages IIB (53.6%) and IIIB (23.2%). Tumour dimensions at diagnosis were ≥5 cm in 56.3% and pelvic nodal involvement was found in 38.4% of the patients. 94% of the patients received curative chemoradiation. Mean HRCTV volume at the time of brachytherapy was 42.2 ±â€¯19 cm3 and mean cumulative dose to HRCTV was 78.9 ±â€¯5.6 Gy. Overall LC, PC, DFS and OS at 2 years were 88.7%, 88.1%, 82.2% and 94% respectively. The predictors for local failure were FIGO stage (p = 0.002) and tumour size at diagnosis (p = 0.009). Late grade 3-4 bladder and bowel toxicities were observed in 3.8% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Our review demonstrates that IGBT is an effective strategy to improve locoregional control with limited long-term sequelae in patients with locally advanced extensive cervical cancer in the setting of a developing country.