Safety of Sports for Patients with Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (SPORT S-ICD): study rationale and protocol.

Background: Recent studies suggest that participation in recreational and even competitive sports is generally safe for patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). However, these studies included only patients with implanted transvenous ICD (TV-ICD). Nowadays, subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) is a safe and effective alternative and is increasingly implanted in younger ICD candidates. Data on the safety of sport participation for patients with implanted S-ICD systems is urgently needed. Objectives: The goal of the study is to quantify the risks (or determine the safety) of sports participation for athletes with an S-ICD, which will guide shared decision making for athletes requiring an ICD and/or wishing to return to sports after implantation. Methods: The SPORT S-ICD (Sports for Patients with Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator) study is an international, multicenter, prospective, noninterventional, observational study, designed specifically to collect data on the safety of sports participation among patients with implanted S-ICD systems who regularly engage in sports activities. Results: A total of 450 patients will undergo baseline assessment including baseline characteristics, indication for S-ICD implantation, arrhythmic history, S-ICD data and programming, and data regarding sports activities. LATITUDE Home Monitoring information will be regularly transferred to the study coordinator for analysis. Conclusion: The results of the study will aid in shaping clinical decision making, and if the tested hypothesis will be proven, it will allow the safe continuation of sports for patients with an implanted S-ICD.

Prognostic impact of combined non-severe aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation on clinical outcomes: a single-centre retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: Though the concomitant occurrence of non-severe aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) is highly prevalent, there are limited data to guide clinical decision-making in this condition. Here, we attempt to determine an aortic valve area (AVA) cut-off value associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with combined non-severe AS and MR. METHODS: Single-centre, retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent echocardiography examination between 2010 and 2021 with evidence of combined non-severe AS and MR. We excluded patients with ≥moderate aortic valve regurgitation or mitral stenosis, as well as patients who underwent any aortic or mitral intervention either prior or following our assessment (n=372). RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 2933 patients with non-severe AS, 506 of them with >mild MR. Patients with both pathologies had lower cardiac output and worse diastolic function.Patients with an AVA ≤1.35 cm² in the presence of >mild MR had the highest rates of heart failure (HF) hospitalisations (HR 3.1, IQR 2.4-4, p<0.001) or mortality (HR 2, IQR 1.8-2.4, p<0.001), which remained significant after adjusting for clinical and echocardiographic parameters. CONCLUSION: Patients with combined non-severe AS and MR have a higher rate of HF hospitalisations and mortality. An AVA≤1.35 cm² in the presence of >mild MR is associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Cardiologic Manifestations in Omicron-Type Versus Wild-Type COVID-19: A Systematic Echocardiographic Study.

Background Information about the cardiac manifestations of the Omicron variant of COVID-19 is limited. We performed a systematic prospective echocardiographic evaluation of consecutive patients hospitalized with the Omicron variant of COVID-19 infection and compared them with similarly recruited patients were propensity matched with the wild-type variant. Methods and Results A total of 162 consecutive patients hospitalized with Omicron COVID-19 underwent complete echocardiographic evaluation within 24 hours of admission and were compared with propensity-matched patients with the wild-type variant (148 pairs). Echocardiography included left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic, right ventricular (RV), strain, and hemodynamic assessment. Echocardiographic parameters during acute infection were compared with historic exams in 62 patients with the Omicron variant and 19 patients with the wild-type variant who had a previous exam within 1 year. Of the patients, 85 (53%) had a normal echocardiogram. The most common cardiac pathology was RV dilatation and dysfunction (33%), followed by elevated LV filling pressure (E/e' ≥14, 29%) and LV systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction <50%, 10%). Compared with the matched wild-type cohort, patients with Omicron had smaller RV end-systolic areas (9.3±4 versus 12.3±4 cm2; P=0.0003), improved RV function (RV fractional-area change, 53.2%±10% versus 39.7%±13% [P<0.0001]; RV S', 12.0±3 versus 10.7±3 cm/s [P=0.001]), and higher stroke volume index (35.6 versus 32.5 mL/m2; P=0.004), all possibly related to lower mean pulmonary pressure (34.6±12 versus 41.1±14 mm Hg; P=0.0001) and the pulmonary vascular resistance index (P=0.0003). LV systolic or diastolic parameters were mostly similar to the wild-type variant-matched cohort apart from larger LV size. However, in patients who had a previous echocardiographic exam, these LV abnormalities were recorded before acute Omicron infection, but not in the wild-type cohort. Numerous echocardiographic parameters were associated with higher in-hospital mortality (LV ejection fraction, stroke volume index, E/e', RV S'). Conclusions In patients with Omicron, RV function is impaired to a lower extent compared with the wild-type variant, possibly related to the attenuated pulmonary parenchymal and/or vascular disease. LV systolic and diastolic abnormalities are as common as in the wild-type variant but were usually recorded before acute infection and probably reflect background cardiac morbidity. Numerous LV and RV abnormalities are associated with adverse outcome in patients with Omicron.

Systematic lung ultrasound in Omicron-type vs. wild-type COVID-19.

AIMS: Preliminary data suggested that patients with Omicron-type-Coronavirus-disease-2019 (COVID-19) have less severe lung disease compared with the wild-type-variant. We aimed to compare lung ultrasound (LUS) parameters in Omicron vs. wild-type COVID-19 and evaluate their prognostic implications. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-two consecutive patients with Omicron-type-COVID-19 underwent LUS within 48 h of admission and were compared with propensity-matched wild-type patients (148 pairs). In the Omicron patients median, first and third quartiles of the LUS-score was 5 [2-12], and only 9% had normal LUS. The majority had either mild (≤5; 37%) or moderate (6-15; 39%), and 15% (≥15) had severe LUS-score. Thirty-six percent of patients had patchy pleural thickening (PPT). Factors associated with LUS-score in the Omicron patients included ischaemic-heart-disease, heart failure, renal-dysfunction, and C-reactive protein. Elevated left-filling pressure or right-sided pressures were associated with the LUS-score. Lung ultrasound-score was associated with mortality [odds ratio (OR): 1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.18; P = 0.03] and with the combined endpoint of mortality and respiratory failure (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07-1.22; P < 0.0001). Patients with the wild-type variant had worse LUS characteristics than the matched Omicron-type patients (PPT: 90 vs. 34%; P < 0.0001 and LUS-score: 8 [5, 12] vs. 5 [2, 10], P = 0.004), irrespective of disease severity. When matched only to the 31 non-vaccinated Omicron patients, these differences were attenuated. CONCLUSION: Lung ultrasound-score is abnormal in the majority of hospitalized Omicron-type patients. Patchy pleural thickening is less common than in matched wild-type patients, but the difference is diminished in the non-vaccinated Omicron patients. Nevertheless, even in this milder form of the disease, the LUS-score is associated with poor in-hospital outcomes.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Myocarditis vs. COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis-Same or Different?

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine-induced myocarditis possibly share common mechanisms secondary to overactivation of the immune system. We aimed to compare the presenting characteristics of ICIs and COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis. We performed a retrospective analysis of characteristics of patients diagnosed with either ICIs or COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis and compared the results to a control group of patients diagnosed with acute viral myocarditis. Eighteen patients diagnosed with ICIs (ICI group) or COVID-19 vaccine (COVID-19 vaccine group)-induced myocarditis, and 20 patients with acute viral myocarditis (Viral group) were included. The ICI group presented mainly with dyspnea vs. chest pain and fever among the COVID-19 vaccine and Viral groups. Peak median high sensitivity Troponin I was markedly lower in the ICI group (median 619 vs. 15,527 and 7388 ng/L, p = 0.004). While the median left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction was 60% among all groups, the ICI group had a lower absolute mean LV global longitudinal strain (13%) and left atrial conduit strain (17%), compared to the COVID-19 vaccine (17% and 30%) and Viral groups (18% and 37%), p = 0.016 and p = 0.001, respectively. Despite a probable similar mechanism, ICI-induced myocarditis's presenting characteristics differed from COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis.

Myocarditis following mRNA Covid-19 vaccination: A pooled analysis.

BACKGROUND: Post-marketing surveillance studies have raised concerns of increased myocarditis rates following coronavirus disease-19 (Covid-19) mRNA vaccines. The present study aims to accumulate the published mRNA Covid-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis cases, describe their clinical characteristics and determine the factors predisposing to critical illness. METHODS: Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL and Google Scholar were systematically searched from inception. Studies reporting adult myocarditis cases following BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination were included. Individual participant data coming from case reports/series were pooled. Proportional random-effects meta-analysis was conducted by combining the pooled cohort and observational studies with aggregated data. RESULTS: Overall, 39 studies were included with a total of 129 patients. Most cases occurred in young males after the second vaccine dose. Myocarditis after the first dose was significantly associated with prior Covid-19 (p-value: 0.025). The most common electrocardiographic finding was ST-segment elevation, while late gadolinium enhancement was invariably observed in cardiac magnetic reasoning. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that signs of heart failure were predictive of subsequent critical illness (Odds ratio: 19.22, 95% confidence intervals-CI: 5.57-275.84). Proportion meta-analysis indicated that complete resolution of symptoms is achieved in 80.5% of patients (95% CI: 59.3-92.1), while the proportion of participants necessitating intensive care unit admission is 7.0% (95% CI: 3.8-12.9). CONCLUSIONS: Myocarditis following mRNA Covid-19 vaccination is typically mild, following an uncomplicated clinical course with rapid improvement of symptoms. Future research is needed to define its exact incidence, clarify its pathophysiology and determine the optimal management plan depending on its severity. Protocol registration: dx.https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bxwtppen.

Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia: Terminology, Mechanism, Diagnosis, and Emergency Therapy.

Polymorphic ventricular tachyarrhythmias are highly lethal arrhythmias. Several types of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia have similar electrocardiographic characteristics but have different modes of therapy. In fact, medications considered the treatment of choice for one form of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, are contraindicated for the other. Yet confusion about terminology, and thus diagnosis and therapy, continues. We present an in-depth review of the different forms of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and propose a practical step-by-step approach for distinguishing these malignant arrhythmias.

Arrhythmic storm from ischemic ventricular fibrillation treated with intravenous quinidine.

We present a case who developed an acute right ventricular infarction. The leads demonstrating ST-segment elevation were different than those expected based on previous publications. We explain why this happened with the aid of 3-dimentional imaging. Our case then developed an arrhythmic storm caused by ischemic ventricular fibrillation (VF). Emergency revascularization failed and the VF-storm failed to respond to sedation, lidocaine and amiodarone but responded to intravenous quinidine.

Heart Failure Due to High-Degree Atrioventricular Block: How Frequent Is It and What Is the Cause?

BACKGROUND: The causes of heart failure (HF) during high-grade atrioventricular block (AVB) are poorly understood. This study assessed the mechanisms of HF in patients with AVB. METHODS: We studied patients presenting (between 2012 and 2016) with high-grade AVB not related to acute myocardial infarction. Patients with preexisting significant valvular heart disease were excluded. All patients underwent comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation during AVB, before pacemaker implantation. The diagnosis of HF was based on the Framingham criteria. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients were included in the study, 50% male, average age 76 ± 13 years. Twenty-eight patients (23%) with AVB presented with HF. Univariate correlates associated with HF were decrease in cardiac output (CO) (odds ratio [OR] 0.68 [95% confidence interval 0.49-0.9] per L/min; P = 0.007), measures of impaired left ventricular (LV) compliance, and increase in diastolic mitral regurgitation (MR) volume (OR 1.04 [1.01-1.07] per cc; P = 0.0016). Ventricular rate during AVB and LV ejection fraction were not significantly associated with the presence of HF. By multivariate nominal logistic analysis, the best model associated with HF included diastolic MR volume (OR 1.04 [1.001-1.09]; P = 0.02), A-wave deceleration time (OR 0.96 [0.94-0.9]; P = 0.001), and CO (OR 0.92 [0.4-1.00]; P = 0.005) (χ2 = 30.6; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.84; P < 0.0001 for the entire model). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of high-degree AVB, clinical HF occurrence correlates with impaired LV compliance and diastolic MR volume, but not with heart rate or LV ejection fraction. The cardiac performance of patients with poor LV compliance and high-volume diastolic MR may show maladjustment to slow heart rates, manifesting as low CO and HF.

Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, ischaemic ventricular fibrillation, and torsade de pointes: importance of the QT and the coupling interval in the differential diagnosis.

AIMS: Distinctive types of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) respond differently to different forms of therapy. We therefore performed the present study to define the electrocardiographic characteristics of different forms of polymorphic VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 190 patients for whom the onset of 305 polymorphic VT events was available. The study group included 87 patients with coronary artery disease who had spontaneous polymorphic VT triggered by short-coupled extrasystoles in the absence of myocardial ischaemia. This group included 32 patients who had a long QT interval but nevertheless had their polymorphic VT triggered by ectopic beats with short coupling interval, a subcategory termed 'pseudo-torsade de pointes] (TdP). For comparison, we included 50 patients who had ventricular fibrillation (VF) during acute myocardial infarction ('ischaemic VF' group) and 53 patients with drug-induced TdP ('true TdP' group). The QT of patients with pseudo-TdP was (by definition) longer than that of patients with polymorphic VT and normal QT (QTc 491.4 ± 25.2 ms vs. 447.3 ± 55.6 ms, P < 0.001). However, their QT was significantly shorter than that of patients with true TdP (QTc 564.6 ± 75.6 ms, P < 0.001). Importantly, the coupling interval of the ectopic beat triggering the arrhythmia was just as short during pseudo-TdP as during polymorphic VT with normal QT (359.1 ± 38.1 ms vs. 356.6 ± 39.4 ms, P = 0.467) but was much shorter than during true TdP (581.2 ± 95.3 ms, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The coupling interval helps discriminate between polymorphic VT that occurs despite a long QT interval (pseudo-TdP) and polymorphic arrhythmias striking because of a long QT (true TdP).

Clinical Presentation of Sustained Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia Without Cardiac Arrest.

Background "Palpitations" are one of the most common complaints prompting medical attention. Textbooks of medicine and cardiology as well as guideline documents and position papers describe palpitations as a common symptom of ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, data to support this description are lacking. The aim of our study was to evaluate the symptomatology of sustained monomorphic VT with emphasis on the prevalence of palpitations. Methods and Results Consecutive patients presenting to our center with a first event of a regular sustained monomorphic VT (n=59) or a regular supraventricular tachycardia (SVT; n=109) between January 2012 and September 2019 were interviewed regarding their symptoms during the arrhythmic event. We included only patients with a first arrhythmic event to avoid the influence of previous medical encounters on our patients' terminology. As expected, patients with VT were older (age 68.8±13.6 versus 52.6±16.8 years; P<0.001), more often of male sex (94.9% versus 37.6%; P<0.001), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (37±11% versus 59±2%, P<0.001) and more comorbidities (87.6% versus 40.5%; P<0.001) compared with patients with SVT. Importantly, even though the heart rate upon presentation did not differ between the 2 groups (165±26 beats/min during VT versus 171±32 beats/min during SVT; P=0.16), symptomatology differed significantly; specifically, palpitations were reported in only 8.8% of VT patients, compared with 90.7% of SVT patients (P<0.001). Common symptoms in the VT group included chest pain (64%), dyspnea (21%), and dizziness (26%). Conclusions Despite similar heart rate, patients with VT rarely report having palpitations, whereas patients with SVT do so commonly. This finding may assist with decision making in patients reporting palpitations in whom an ECG tracing is not available.

Quinidine-responsive out-of-hospital polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary heart disease.

AIMS: We recently reported that patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who develop polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) during the healing phase of an acute coronary event, generally fail to respond to revascularization or standard antiarrhythmic therapy but respond immediately to quinidine therapy. Here, we describe that CAD patients presenting with out-of-hospital polymorphic VT without a recent coronary event or an obvious precipitating factor, also respond uniquely to quinidine therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective study of patients with unheralded, mainly out-of-hospital, polymorphic VT related to CAD but without evidence of acute myocardial ischaemia. We identified 20 patients who developed polymorphic VT without precipitating factors. The polymorphic VT events were triggered by extrasystoles with short (376 ± 49 ms) coupling interval. Arrhythmic storms occurred in 70% patients. These arrhythmic storms were generally refractory to conventional antiarrhythmic therapy but invariably responded to quinidine therapy. Revascularization was antiarrhythmic in 3 patients despite the absent clinical or ECG signs of ischaemia. During long-term follow-up (range 2 months to 11 years), 3 (15%) of patients not receiving quinidine developed recurrent polymorphic VT. There were no recurrent arrhythmias during long-term quinidine therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CAD may develop polymorphic VT in the absence of obvious acute ischaemia or apparent precipitating factors, presenting as out-of-hospital polymorphic VT with high risk of arrhythmic storms that respond uniquely to quinidine therapy.

Grapefruit juice prolongs the QT interval of healthy volunteers and patients with long QT syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The list of medications linked to drug-induced long QT syndrome (LQTS) is diverse. It is possible that food products too have QT-prolonging potential. OBJECTIVE: We tested the effects of grapefruit juice on the QT interval with the methodology used by the pharmaceutical industry to test new drugs. METHODS: This was an open-label, randomized, crossover study with blinded outcome evaluation, a thorough QT study of grapefruit juice performed according to the Guidelines for the Clinical Evaluation of QT/QTc for Non-antiarrhythmic Drugs. Thirty healthy volunteers and 10 patients with congenital LQTS were studied. Healthy volunteers drank 2 L of grapefruit juice (in divided doses), or received 400 mg oral moxifloxacin, in a randomized crossover study. Patients with LQTS were tested with only grapefruit. Repeated baseline, off-drug, and on-drug (grapefruit or moxifloxacin) electrocardiograms were scanned and coded. QT measurements were done with electronic calipers. RESULTS: In comparison to off-drug electrocardiograms, grapefruit juice led to significant rate-corrected QT (QTc) prolongation. The absolute net QTc prolongation from grapefruit was 14.0 ms (95% confidence interval 6.2-21.7 ms; P < .001). The QT-prolonging effects of grapefruit in healthy volunteers were comparable with those of moxifloxacin. The QT-prolonging effects of grapefruit juice were greater in female patients and particularly marked in patients with LQTS (net QTc prolongation 21.8 ms; 95% confidence interval 3.4-35.3 ms; P = .034). CONCLUSION: Grapefruit juice, at doses tested, prolongs the QT interval. The effect is significant in healthy volunteers, greater in female patients, and more so in patients with LQTS.

Quinidine-Responsive Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease.

BACKGROUND: Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) without QT prolongation is well described in patients without structural heart disease (mainly idiopathic ventricular fibrillation and Brugada syndrome) and in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients with polymorphic VT related to coronary artery disease, but without evidence of acute myocardial ischemia. RESULTS: The authors identified 43 patients in whom polymorphic VT developed within days of an otherwise uncomplicated myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization procedure. The polymorphic VT events were invariably triggered by extrasystoles with short (364±36 ms) coupling interval. Arrhythmic storms (4-16 events of polymorphic VT deteriorating to ventricular fibrillation) occurred in 23 (53%) patients. These arrhythmic storms were always refractory to conventional antiarrhythmic therapy, including intravenous amiodarone, but invariably responded to quinidine therapy. In-hospital mortality was 17% for patients with arrhythmic storm. Patients treated with quinidine invariably survived to hospital discharge. During long-term follow-up (of 5.6±6 years; range, 1 month to 18 years), 3 (16%) of patients discharged without quinidine developed recurrent polymorphic VT. There were no recurrent arrhythmias during quinidine therapy Conclusions: Arrhythmic storm with recurrent polymorphic VT in patients with coronary disease responds to quinidine therapy when other antiarrhythmic drugs (including intravenous amiodarone) fail.