Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy: Conformity of contour adaptation for prostate cancer, rectal cancer and lymph node oligometastases among radiation therapists and radiation oncologists.

Background and purpose: Online adaptive MR-guided treatment planning workflows facilitate daily contour adaptation to the actual anatomy. Allocating contour adaptation to radiation therapists (RTTs) instead of radiation oncologists (ROs) might allow for increasing workflow efficiency. This study investigates conformity of adapted target contours provided by dedicated RTTs and ROs. Materials and methods: In a simulated online procedure, 6 RTTs and 6 ROs recontoured targets and organs at risk (OAR) in prostate cancer (n = 2), rectal cancer (n = 2) and lymph node-oligometastases (n = 2) cases. RTTs gained contouring competence beforehand by following a specific in-house training program. For all target contours and the reference delineations volumetric differences were determined and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), conformity index (CI) and generalized CI were calculated. Delineation time and -confidence were registered for targets and OAR. Impact of contour adaptation on treatment plan quality was investigated. Results: Delineation conformity was generally high with DSC, CI and generalized CI values in the range of 0.81-0.94, 0.87-0.95 and 0.63-0.85 for prostate cancer, rectal cancer and LN-oligometastasis, respectively. Target volumes were comparable for both, RTTs and ROs. Time needed and confidence in contour adaptation was comparable as well. Treatment plans derived with adapted contours did not violate dose volume constrains as used in clinical routine. Conclusion: After tumor site specific training, daily contour adaptations as needed in adaptive online radiotherapy workflows can be accurately performed by RTTs. Conformity of the derived contours is high and comparable to contours as provided by ROs.

Flexible inhibitory control of visually evoked defensive behavior by the ventral lateral geniculate nucleus.

Animals can choose to act upon, or to ignore, sensory stimuli, depending on circumstance and prior knowledge. This flexibility is thought to depend on neural inhibition, through suppression of inappropriate and disinhibition of appropriate actions. Here, we identified the ventral lateral geniculate nucleus (vLGN), an inhibitory prethalamic area, as a critical node for control of visually evoked defensive responses in mice. The activity of vLGN projections to the medial superior colliculus (mSC) is modulated by previous experience of threatening stimuli, tracks the perceived threat level in the environment, and is low prior to escape from a visual threat. Optogenetic stimulation of the vLGN abolishes escape responses, and suppressing its activity lowers the threshold for escape and increases risk-avoidance behavior. The vLGN most strongly affects visual threat responses, potentially via modality-specific inhibition of mSC circuits. Thus, inhibitory vLGN circuits control defensive behavior, depending on an animal's prior experience and its anticipation of danger in the environment.

Impact of a vacuum cushion on intrafraction motion during online adaptive MR-guided SBRT for pelvic and para-aortic lymph node oligometastases.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Vacuum cushion immobilization is commonly used during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to reduce intrafraction motion. We investigated target and bony anatomy intrafraction motion (translations and rotations) during online adaptive SBRT on an MR-linac for pelvic/para-aortic lymph node metastases with and without vacuum cushion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients underwent 5x7 Gy SBRT on a 1.5T MR-linac, 19 patients were treated with vacuum cushion, 19 without and 1 patient sequentially with and without. Intrafraction motion was calculated for target lymph nodes (GTVs) and nearby bony anatomy, for three time intervals (pre-position verification (PV), pre-post, PV-post, relating to the online MRI scans) per treatment fraction. RESULTS: Vacuum cushion immobilization significantly reduced anterior-posterior translations for the pre-PV and pre-post intervals, for bony anatomy and pre-post interval for GTV (p < 0.05). Mean GTV intrafraction motion reduction in posterior direction was 0.7 mm (95% confidence interval 0.3-1.1 mm) for pre-post interval (mean time = 32 min). Shifts in other directions were not significantly reduced. More motion occurred in pre-PV interval than in PV-post interval (mean time = 16 min for both); vacuum cushion immobilization did not reduce intrafraction motion during the beam-on period. CONCLUSION: A vacuum cushion reduces GTV and bony anatomy intrafraction motion in posterior direction during pelvic/para-aortic lymph node SBRT. This motion reduction was found for the first 16 min per session. For single targets this motion can be corrected for directly with an MR-linac. Intrafraction motion was not reduced during the second half of the session, the period of radiotherapy delivery on an MR-linac. Vacuum cushion immobilization may not be necessary for patients with single lymph node oligometastases undergoing SBRT on an MR-linac.