Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Int J Health Care Finance Econ ; 1(2): 159-87, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14625924

ABSTRACT

We derive a two-stage model in which health plans first compete to be selected by employers and subsequently compete to be chosen by employees. We identify the key determinants of competition and show that increasing competition at one stage often comes at the expense of competition at the other stage. Many economists and policymakers have argued that in order to increase competition among health plans, employers should offer multiple plans and structure premium contributions to make employees more price sensitive. While our theoretical model shows that following this policy prescription may not actually lead to lower premiums, our empirical analysis provides some support for this recommendation. We also find that if employers instead pay the full premium, premiums increase when they offer additional plans. These results have important implications for both employers and policymakers.


Subject(s)
Employer Health Costs , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/economics , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Managed Competition/economics , Consumer Behavior/economics , Cost Sharing , Fees and Charges , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/statistics & numerical data , Humans , United States
3.
Med Care Res Rev ; 57 Suppl 1: 11-35, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11092156

ABSTRACT

Health insurance confers important private and social benefits. Disparities in coverage among the population remain an important public policy issue. The authors focus on the health insurance status of white, black, and Hispanic Americans in both 1987 and 1996 and identify gaps in minority health care coverage relative to white Americans. They also investigate the access of workers in these groups to employment-based health insurance. Identified are factors underlying changes in the insurance status of workers during the past decade in terms of changes in population characteristics and structural shifts underlying the demand for and supply of health insurance. The authors find that while coverage has declined for workers in most racial/ethnic groups, the experience of Hispanic males appears to be unique in that changes in their characteristics as well as structural shifts account for their decline in employment-related coverage. Structural shifts dominated the changes in coverage rates for other groups.


Subject(s)
Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Medically Uninsured/statistics & numerical data , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/trends , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Insurance Coverage/trends , Insurance, Health/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Econometric , Regression Analysis , United States
5.
Inquiry ; 34(4): 311-24, 1997.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9472230

ABSTRACT

This paper uses data from the 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey to analyze the role that attitudes toward medical care and risk play in Medicare beneficiaries' demand for supplemental insurance. We investigate the factors affecting the demand for any supplemental insurance as well as specific Medigap benefits, such as coverage for Medicare's gaps in hospital and physician services, skilled nursing facility care, and prescription drug purchases. Our results indicate that attitudes significantly influence beneficiaries' decisions to purchase supplemental insurance and specific benefits with effects that are comparable in magnitude to those of self-reported health measures, education, and asset income.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Medigap/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/economics , Aged/psychology , Cost Sharing , Decision Making , Health Services Needs and Demand/economics , Health Services Research , Health Status , Humans , Insurance Benefits , Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/classification , Risk-Taking , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
6.
Med Care Res Rev ; 52(3): 389-408, 1995 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10144870

ABSTRACT

As employers have turned to managed care to curtail the rising cost of health care benefits, the number of HMO enrollees has proliferated. Between 1984 and 1994, HMO enrollment increased from approximately 15 million to over 49 million individuals. Although research has indicated that HMOs have been effective in limiting medical costs, there is mixed evidence in the literature on how they achieve these savings. This article uses data from the 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey to examine one hypothesis for these patterns: that HMOs enroll a healthier population than fee-for-service plans. To test this hypothesis we examine HMO and fee-for-service enrollees with respect to socioeconomic variables such as age, race, sex, income, education, health status, and location. Our results indicate that HMOs tend to enroll a younger but not much healthier population than traditional fee-for-service plans, suggesting that self-selection is not a major contributor to HMO cost savings.


Subject(s)
Fee-for-Service Plans/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost Savings , Demography , Educational Status , Fee-for-Service Plans/economics , Female , Health Care Costs , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Health Services Research , Health Status , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Racial Groups , Regression Analysis , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , United States
8.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 13(1): 301-14, 1994.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8188150

ABSTRACT

Risk pools for small employers have become an integral part of proposals for national health care reform and have been implemented by a number of states. These explicit attempts to pool small employers are occurring at the same time that many small-firm employees obtain health insurance through implicit pooling arrangements as the dependent of a policyholder insured by a large firm. We use data from the 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey to document the extent of implicit pooling arrangements, to examine whether small-firm employees and their dependents are adverse health risks, and to assess the cost implications of pooling small- and large-firm employees and dependents.


Subject(s)
Health Benefit Plans, Employee/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Reform/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance Pools/legislation & jurisprudence , National Health Insurance, United States/legislation & jurisprudence , Cost Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/economics , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Care Reform/economics , Humans , Insurance Pools/economics , Insurance Selection Bias , National Health Insurance, United States/economics , United States
9.
Inquiry ; 29(1): 33-43, 1992.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1559722

ABSTRACT

Estimates from the National Medical Expenditure Survey imply that in 1987 only two-thirds of elderly Medicare beneficiaries held the amount and type of insurance that is generally recommended to supplement Medicare, namely, 57.7% with private hospital/medical insurance from one source and 6.6% with only Medicaid. Of the remainder, 19.8% had more than one source of private insurance; slightly more than 1% had one source of extra-cash or disease-specific insurance as their only supplementary coverage; and 12.9% had no supplementary coverage at all. In addition, more than 500,000 Medicaid enrollees had purchased private insurance, despite the comprehensive coverage offered by Medicaid. Although the issue of multiple coverage has been dramatized by stories of poor, very elderly persons who have purchased numerous Medigap plans, beneficiaries who purchase coverage from more than one source are likely to be relatively young, more highly educated, and financially better off.


Subject(s)
Insurance, Medigap/economics , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost Sharing , Data Collection , Educational Status , Female , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Policy/economics , Health Services Research , Humans , Income , Insurance, Medigap/standards , Insurance, Medigap/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Male , Marriage/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/standards , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Multivariate Analysis , Racial Groups , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...