Trocar vs. Seldinger small bore pleural drains: does the technique influence the outcomes? A prospective single-centre study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare two positioning techniques of 12-French (Fr) thoracic drains in terms of efficacy, safety, and patient comfort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, non-randomized, competitive, non-inferiority study comparing the Seldinger vs. Trocar technique. The primary endpoint was an analysis of the factors that led to unsuccessful drainage positioning. Between the two groups, clinical variables, procedure times, pain, and complications were compared. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled in group 1 (Seldinger) and 45 in group 2 (Trocar). The mean procedural time was 7.93±3.02 min vs. 7.09±3.67 min, respectively (p: 0.33). The mean VAS for procedural pain was 2.22±1.47 vs. 2.80±1.88, p: 0.07, and the mean at day 2 was 3.6±1.2 in the SBWGD group vs. 2.7±1.1 in the Unico Group (p: 0.04). There was no difference in terms of complications, residual effusion, and pneumothorax at the first post-procedural chest X-ray. Four days after the procedure, the drain removal rate was 11.6% in group 1 vs. 25% in group 2 p: 0.063). The chest tube was removed after a mean period of 8.87±7.20 days after resolution of pleural effusion or tube dislodgement (7 cases in group 1 vs. 11 in group 2, p: 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: The two techniques resulted in comparable pain and complication rates. Both drains are well-tolerated and efficient at draining pleural effusion, with very low rates of complications and failure. We recommend inserting a longer tube for patients who require chest drainage for an extended period of time.

Malignant solitary fibrous tumour of the chest wall: a challenging case.

Solitary fibrous tumors are very rare neoplasms that seldomly appear in extra-serosal soft tissues. In such cases, an accurate preoperative diagnosis is often difficult and challenging, especially in extrapleural ones. Traditionally, extrapleural solitary fibrous tumours have been regarded as indolent neoplasms similar to their intra-thoracic counterparts, although there has been some evidence that this subgroup could be a subset of more aggressive malignant tumours. For these reasons, surgical excision is mandatory and represents, to date, the best therapeutic option. In this article we report a case of a malignant solitary fibrous tumor of the chest wall in a 58-year-old man. Problems related to differential diagnosis and the possible pitfalls that can be encountered in the diagnostic process of such rare tumors are discussed.

[Clinical effect of bovine pericardial strips on air leak after stapled pulmonary resection in "frail" patients: early results]. / Impiego clinico di suturatrici rivestite con pericadio bovino nella prevenzione delle perdite aeree postoperatorie in pazienti "fragili" sottoposti a resezione polmonare.

AIM: Postoperative air leaks and in particular persistent air leaks (>5 days) after pulmonary resection still represent a common complication and the first cause of hospital stay delay. Aim of this experimental trial was to investigate the efficacy of the use of bovine pericardium strips (in terms of reduction of postoperative leakage and hospital stay) in "critical" patients (COPD, emphysema etc.) who underwent pulmonary resection. METHODS: From October 2010 to February 2011, eight patients (experimental group, Group A) were preoperative selected and underwent pulmonary resection with bovine pericardium strips (Peri-Strips Dry; Synovis ). The inclusion criteria of a "frail patient" were established by a dedicate pneumologist according with clinical and functional data (predicted postoperative FEV1 ranging from 35% and 80% of the theorical predicted value). For comparison, from January 2010 to September 2010, we retrospectively reviewed the data of 28 patients who satisfied the same inclusion criteria and underwent pulmonary resection with standard surgical procedures. This group of patients represents our control group (Group B). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, gender, preoperative risk factors for developing a postoperative air leak, preop FEV1 and type of resection. No technical deficiencies in the use of bovine pericardium strips were observed in Group A. Postoperative leakage was significant different in the two groups being persistent air leak detected in 0% in Group A versus 17.8% of Group B (P=0.046). Consequently, chest tube duration (6.75±0.84 days [Group A] vs. 9.70±1.26 days (Group B), P=0.019) and hospital stay (10.13±0.83 days [Group A] vs. 12.95±1.37 days [Group B], P=0.013) were lower in the experimental group. CONCLUSION: Bovine pericardium strips are safe and easy-to-do technique to reduce postoperative air leaks after pulmonary resection in "critical" patients.

Small-bore wire-guided chest drains: safety, tolerability, and effectiveness in pneumothorax, malignant effusions, and pleural empyema.

BACKGROUND: The use of small-bore wire-guided chest drains for pleural effusions and pneumothorax has become popular; however, limited data are available on its efficacy and morbidity. The aim of this retrospective study is to measure, via the analysis of the so far largest reported cohort, the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of this approach in different clinical conditions. METHODS: In the period from January 2002 to December 2008, 1092 patients have undergone the positioning of a small-bore wire-guided chest drain (12F) for the evidence of pneumothorax or pleural effusion and have been monitored over time for morbidity, pain at the time of insertion (measured via the visual analogue scale), and drain failure for misplacement or blockage. Patients with trauma were excluded from this study. RESULTS: Male/female ratio and mean age were respectively 418:674 and 55.85 ± 18.6. Three-hundred ninety-nine (36.5%) drains were inserted for pneumothorax, 324 (29.7%) for malignant effusion, 97 (8.9%) for empyema, and 272 (24.9%) for nonmalignant effusion. The pain experience was on average "very mild" (mean visual analogue scale = 4.6 mm). The overall drain failure rate was 12.9%. The percentage of successful cases was 93.8% in malignant effusion, 93% in pneumothorax, and 92.3% in nonmalignant effusion; in the cases of pathologically diagnosed empyema, drains were more likely to get blocked (74.2%). We recorded 1 serious complication within the malignant effusion group. CONCLUSIONS: Wire-guided 12F Seldinger-type drains are a well-tolerated and effective method of treating pneumothorax and uncomplicated pleural effusions (malignant and nonmalignant) with acceptable morbidity. The use of 12F small-bore chest drain is not indicated for the treatment of empyema.