Prioritizing geriatrics in medical education improves care for all.

Within the United States, there is a deficit of Geriatricians providing care for older adults, and this deficit will only grow as the population continues to age, meaning all clinicians, particularly Internal Medicine (IM) and Family Medicine (FM) trained physicians, will provide the bulk of primary care for older adults. However, geriatric training requirements for clinicians fall short, and in the case of IM were reduced as of 2022). Serving as a call to action, this article provides insight on ways to enhance geriatric education for all graduate medical trainees, utilizing both conventional teaching and newer, non-traditional media, such as national online journal clubs, podcasts, and online teaching curricula, as well as expanding sites of training to include evidence-based models of care, such as the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE). Providing geriatric education improves care for older adults and our future selves, ensuring trainees are prepared to care and advocate for this diverse and often vulnerable population.

Eating Problems in Advanced Dementia: Navigating Difficult Conversations.

Introduction: The majority of older adults with advanced dementia (AD) develop difficulties with eating and swallowing, often prompting concerns about nutrition and quality of life. Employing a palliative approach requires providers to attain skills in addressing symptoms and communicating with family caregivers about the trajectory of AD and associated dysphagia, as well as to elicit goals of care. Research suggests internal medicine (IM) residents often perceive minimal education during training addressing skills needed to care for patients with AD. Methods: We developed and piloted a small-group interactive seminar utilizing a trigger video depicting a family meeting addressing eating problems in a patient with AD. Case-based learning, small-group discussion, and learner reflection were employed. We assessed the impact on 82 of the 106 IM, medicine-pediatrics, and neurology residents who participated in the seminar. Results: Participant evaluation indicated residents showed high satisfaction and perceived the educational content of the seminar to be robust and clinically relevant. We found statistically significant (p < .001) improvements in self-reported confidence in dementia-specific skills postseminar. Effect size was large to very large (Cohen's d = 1.3-1.7). Discussion: An interactive, case-based seminar utilizing a video depicting a realistic family meeting improved residents' self-efficacy in skills needed to address nutritional issues, engage in goals-of-care discussions, and reflect on concerns among caregivers of patients with AD. The seminar teaches important geriatric and palliative concepts meant to improve residents' ability to care for older adults with AD in their future careers.

AGS Position Statement: Resource Allocation Strategies and Age-Related Considerations in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to impact older adults disproportionately, from severe illness and hospitalization to increased mortality risk. Concurrently, concerns about potential shortages of healthcare professionals and health supplies to address these needs have focused attention on how resources are ultimately allocated and used. Some strategies misguidedly use age as an arbitrary criterion, inappropriately disfavoring older adults. This statement represents the official policy position of the American Geriatrics Society (AGS). It is intended to inform stakeholders including hospitals, health systems, and policymakers about ethical considerations to consider when developing strategies for allocating scarce resources during an emergency involving older adults. Members of the AGS Ethics Committee collaborated with interprofessional experts in ethics, law, nursing, and medicine (including geriatrics, palliative care, emergency medicine, and pulmonology/critical care) to conduct a structured literature review and examine relevant reports. The resulting recommendations defend a particular view of distributive justice that maximizes relevant clinical factors and deemphasizes or eliminates factors placing arbitrary, disproportionate weight on advanced age. The AGS positions include (1) avoiding age per se as a means for excluding anyone from care; (2) assessing comorbidities and considering the disparate impact of social determinants of health; (3) encouraging decision makers to focus primarily on potential short-term (not long-term) outcomes; (4) avoiding ancillary criteria such as "life-years saved" and "long-term predicted life expectancy" that might disadvantage older people; (5) forming and staffing triage committees tasked with allocating scarce resources; (6) developing institutional resource allocation strategies that are transparent and applied uniformly; and (7) facilitating appropriate advance care planning. The statement includes recommendations that should be immediately implemented to address resource allocation strategies during COVID-19, aligning with AGS positions. The statement also includes recommendations for post-pandemic review. Such review would support revised strategies to ensure that governments and institutions have equitable emergency resource allocation strategies, avoid future discriminatory language and practice, and have appropriate guidance to develop national frameworks for emergent resource allocation decisions. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1136-1142, 2020.

Rationing Limited Healthcare Resources in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond: Ethical Considerations Regarding Older Adults.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to impact older adults disproportionately with respect to serious consequences ranging from severe illness and hospitalization to increased mortality risk. Concurrently, concerns about potential shortages of healthcare professionals and health supplies to address these issues have focused attention on how these resources are ultimately allocated and used. Some strategies, for example, misguidedly use age as an arbitrary criterion that disfavors older adults in resource allocation decisions. This is a companion article to the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) position statement, "Resource Allocation Strategies and Age-Related Considerations in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond." It is intended to inform stakeholders including hospitals, health systems, and policymakers about ethical considerations that should be considered when developing strategies for allocation of scarce resources during an emergency involving older adults. This review presents the legal and ethical background for the position statement and discusses these issues that informed the development of the AGS positions: (1) age as a determining factor, (2) age as a tiebreaker, (3) criteria with a differential impact on older adults, (4) individual choices and advance directives, (5) racial/ethnic disparities and resource allocation, and (6) scoring systems and their impact on older adults. It also considers the role of advance directives as expressions of individual preferences in pandemics. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1143-1149, 2020.

Results From a Survey of American Geriatrics Society Members' Views on Physician-Assisted Suicide.

BACKGROUND: Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is a controversial practice, currently legal in nine states and the District of Columbia. No prior study explores the views of the American Geriatrics Society (AGS) membership on PAS. DESIGN: We surveyed 1488 randomly selected AGS members via email. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 369 AGS members completed the survey (24.8% response rate). ANALYSIS: We conducted bivariate correlation analyses of beliefs related to support for PAS. We also conducted qualitative analysis of open-ended responses. RESULTS: There was no consensus regarding the acceptability of PAS, with 47% supporting and 52% opposing this practice. PAS being legal in the respondent's state, belief that respect for autonomy alone is sufficient to justify PAS, and intent to prescribe or support requests for PAS if legal in state of practice all correlated with support for PAS. There was no consensus on whether the AGS should oppose, support, or adopt a neutral stance on PAS. Most respondents believed that PAS is more complex among patients with low health literacy, low English proficiency, disability, dependency, or frailty. Most respondents supported mandatory palliative care consultation and independent assessments from two physicians. Themes identified from qualitative analysis include role of the medical profession, uncertainty of the role of professional organizations, potential unintended consequences, autonomy, and ethical and moral considerations. CONCLUSION: There was no consensus among respondents regarding the acceptability of PAS. Respondents expressed concern about vulnerable older populations and the need for safeguards when responding to requests for PAS. Ethical, legal, and policy discussions regarding PAS should consider vulnerable populations. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:23-30, 2019.

Speech-Language Pathologists' Views About Aspiration Risk and Comfort Feeding in Advanced Dementia.

BACKGROUND: Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are often called upon to assess swallowing function for older adults with advanced dementia at high risk of aspiration and make recommendations about whether the patient can safely continue oral nutrition. OBJECTIVE: To describe the circumstances under which SLPs recommend oral nutritional intake for these patients. METHODS: A mail survey of a national probability sample of SLPs (n = 731). Speech-language pathologists were asked if there were circumstances in which they would recommend oral feeding for patients with advanced dementia at high risk of aspiration, and if yes, to describe the circumstances under which they do so. RESULTS: Six themes emerged: (1) when patient preferences are known; (2) for quality of life near end of life; (3) if aspiration risk mitigation strategies are employed; (4) if physician's preference; (5) if aspiration risk is clearly documented and acknowledged; and (6) if SLP is knowledgeable about current evidence of lack of benefit of feeding tubes in advanced dementia or that nothing by mouth status will not necessarily prevent aspiration pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Speech-language pathologists have an important role within the interprofessional team in assessing swallowing in patients with advanced dementia, advising family and hospital staff about risks and benefits of oral feeding, and the safest techniques for doing so, to maximize quality of life for these patients near the end of life. Speech-language pathologists are often faced with balancing concerns about aspiration risk and recommending the more palliative approach of oral feeding for pleasure and comfort, potentially creating moral distress for the SLP.

Advance Directives and Care Received by Older Nursing Home Residents.

BACKGROUND: Research shows variable success as to whether care provided aligns with individual patient preferences as reflected in their advance directives (AD). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to study AD status and subsequent care received in older nursing home (NH) residents deemed at risk for infections and care transitions: those with a urinary catheter (UC), feeding tube (FT), or both. Design/participants/measurements: A subgroup analysis of a prospective cohort of 90 residents with a UC and/or FT from 15 NHs in southeast Michigan. Outcomes assessed at enrollment and at 30-day intervals were hospitalizations and antibiotic use. The ADs were divided as follows: (1) comfort oriented: comfort measures only, no hospital transfer; (2) palliative oriented: comfort focused, allowing hospital transfer (except intensive care unit), antibiotic use, but no cardiopulmonary resuscitation; (3) usual care: full code, no limitations to care. We calculated incidences for these outcomes. RESULTS: Seventy-eight (87%) residents had ADs: 18 (23%) comfort oriented, 32 (41%) palliative oriented, and 28 (36%) usual care. The groups did not differ regarding demographics, comorbidity, function, device presence, or time in study. Using the usual care group as comparison, the comfort-oriented group was hospitalized at a similar rate (Incidence rate [IR] = 15.6/1000 follow-up days vs IR = 8.8/1000 follow-up days, Incident rate ratio [IRR] 0.6 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.3 -1.1], P value .09) but received fewer antibiotics (IR = 18.9/1000 follow-up days vs IR = 7.5/1000 follow-up days, IRR 0.4 [95% CI, 0.2-0.8], P value .005). CONCLUSION: Nursing home residents with comfort-oriented ADs were hospitalized at a rate similar to those with usual-care ADs but received fewer antibiotics, although the small sample size of this analysis suggests these findings deserve further study.

Enhancing provider knowledge and patient screening for palliative care needs in chronic multimorbid patients receiving home-based primary care.

This article describes a pilot model to increase palliative care (PC) knowledge and collaboration among providers and to systematically identify chronic multimorbid home care patients who would benefit from focused discussion of potential PC needs. Thirty health care providers from a home-based primary care team attended interdisciplinary trainings. The Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) tool was used to trigger discussions of potential palliative needs at team rounds for patients who scored below a cutoff point on the tool. Palliative Performance Scale implementation added little burden on nurses and triggered a discussion in 51 flagged patients. The tool successfully identified 75% of patients who died or were discharged. Screening was systematic and consistent and resulted in targeted discussions about PC needs without generating additional burden on our PC consult service. This model shows promise for enhancing collaborative patient care and access to PC.

Perceptions and attitudes about hospice and palliative care among community-dwelling older adults.

It is expected that the American geriatric population will have an increased need for hospice and palliative care services over the next few decades. We surveyed 187 community dwelling older adults about several aspects related to end-of-life (EOL) care. Participants were much more familiar with the term hospice than palliative care. In general, they had positive attitudes towards hospice and palliative care. Although experience caring for a dying relative was common, it wasn't associated with better attitudes towards hospice and palliative care or better familiarity with these terms. Familiarity with the term palliative care was associated with better attitudes towards EOL care. Our findings highlight the need for enhanced end-of-life care education among older adults, and reinforce the need for further research in this area.

Internal medicine house officers' attitudes and experience with patients who overstep patient-physician boundaries.

Maintenance of appropriate social boundaries is an essential aspect of patient care. Given limited clinical experience, house officers may be especially vulnerable to such transgressions. We studied the frequency of patients' transgressions of boundaries and house officer responses to these transgressions. An online survey was administered to internal medicine house officers at the University of Michigan Health System that addressed the frequency of patient-physician boundary transgressions, house officer responses to transgressions, and the perceived need for education regarding transgressions. The frequency of reported patient transgressions of various boundaries during the past 6 months ranged from 0 to more than 30. The most common reported incident was being called by their first name, and the least common incidents included patients engaging/attempting to engage in sexual contact and attempting to give expensive gifts. Most respondents denied the need for education regarding appropriate boundaries with patients; however, most perceived a need for training on how to respond to transgressions. Overall, there was a wide range in reported frequencies of transgressions. The frequency of transgressions reported by house officers was greater than what is previously described for attending physicians though their responses to transgressions were similar.

Management of bleeding associated with malignant wounds.

Bleeding malignant wounds in palliative care patients can be anxiety-provoking for patients, their caregivers, and healthcare providers, and can be difficult to manage. We present the case of a 60-year-old man with a bleeding neck wound due to squamous cell carcinoma of the hypopharynx admitted to our inpatient palliative care unit. Management of bleeding included local wound care measures and psychosocial support for the patient and his wife. We review therapeutic approaches to managing bleeding malignant wounds with the aim of providing clinically useful information.

Self-perceived competence among medical residents in skills needed to care for patients with advanced dementia versus metastatic cancer.

To examine medical residents' perceived competence in caring for patients with dementia we conducted an online survey of all 120 second, third and fourth-year residents in Internal Medicine, Medicine/Pediatrics, and Family Medicine at University of Michigan. A structured survey elicited residents' training, experience, confidence, and perceived career needs for skills in estimating prognosis, symptom management, and communication in caring for patients with dementia, compared to patients with metastatic cancer. Among the 61 (51 %) respondents, a majority report lower confidence in assessing prognosis and eliciting treatment wishes in patients with dementia (vs. metastatic cancer), and in performing skills integral to the care of patients with dementia, including the ability to assess caregiver needs, decisional capacity, advise on place of care, and manage agitation, despite viewing these skills as important to their future careers. These findings support the need for enhanced education on optimal care of patients with advanced dementia.

Antimicrobial use at the end of life among hospitalized patients with advanced cancer.

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate antimicrobial use among patients with advanced cancer. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients experiencing cancer-related death while hospitalized. RESULTS: Among 145 patients, 126 (86.9%) received antimicrobials for a mean of 12.5 ± 12.9 days. 88 (69.8%) of 126 had clinical findings suggestive of infection. Sixty-one patients (48.4%) had positive cultures, the remaining were treated empirically. "Comfort care" was ultimately pursued in 99 (78.5%) of 126; 35 (35.4%) of 99 continued to receive antimicrobials after a transition to comfort care for an average of 1.6 ± 1.1 days. On average, antimicrobials were discontinued <1day prior to death. CONCLUSION: Antimicrobial use was common among patients with advanced cancer. Even after transition to comfort care, more than one third of patients remained on antimicrobials. The risks and burdens of antimicrobials should be carefully examined when comfort is the stated goal.

A call for guidance in the use of left ventricular assist devices in older adults.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are approved as "destination therapy" (permanent use without plans for transplantation) in individuals with advanced heart failure who are not candidates for a cardiac transplant; as such, these devices are increasingly being used in older adults. Although LVADs have been shown to increase quality of life and survival, the associated treatment burdens and complications deserve careful consideration. The current study illustrates myriad clinical challenges that can arise during long-term mechanical support using an older adult case history. Current data on LVAD use in older adults is reviewed, and a discussion of relevant points to consider before LVAD implantation in older adults, including advance care planning, assessment of gait and cognition, and the potential for substantial caregiver burden, is undertaken.

Tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia: knowledge and practice of speech-language pathologists.

CONTEXT: Speech-language pathologists (SLP) are often called on to evaluate eating difficulties in patients with dementia. OBJECTIVES: To assess factors associated with SLPs' knowledge and recommendations about feeding tubes in patients with advanced dementia. METHODS: A mail survey was administered to a probability sample of 1500 SLPs from the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association mailing list; 731 usable surveys were received (response rate=53.7%). Self-perceived preparedness, knowledge, and care recommendations were measured. Knowledge items were scored as "evidence based" or not according to the best evidence in the literature. RESULTS: Only 42.1% of SLP respondents felt moderately/well prepared to manage dysphagia. Only 22.0% of respondents recognized that tube feeding is unlikely to reduce risk of aspiration pneumonia whereas a slight majority understood that tube feeding would not likely prevent an uncomfortable death (50.2%), improve functional status (54.5%), or enhance quality of life (QOL) (63.2%). A majority (70.0%) was willing to consider recommending oral feeding despite high risk of aspiration. Logistic regression analyses indicated that those willing to consider this recommendation gave the most evidence-based responses to knowledge questions about tube feeding outcomes: aspiration pneumonia (odds ratio [OR]=1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.07-2.87), functional status (OR=1.43, 95% CI=1.0-2.06), QOL (OR=2.19, 95% CI=1.52-3.17), and prevent uncomfortable death (OR=1.97, 95% CI=1.37-2.88). Logistic regression analyses also indicated that those with more experience evaluating patients with dementia gave the most evidence-based response to two knowledge questions: aspiration pneumonia (OR=2.64, 95% CI=1.48-4.72) and prevent uncomfortable death (OR=2.03, 95% CI=1.35-3.05) whereas those with higher self-perceived preparedness in managing dysphagia in dementia had less knowledge in two areas: aspiration pneumonia (OR=0.57, 95% CI=0.38-0.84) and QOL (OR=0.72, 95% CI=0.51-1.01). CONCLUSION: Misperceptions among SLPs about tube feeding in advanced dementia are common, especially in relation to risk of aspiration. Knowledge about tube feeding outcomes was positively associated with experience and inversely associated with self-perceived higher preparedness in evaluating patients with dementia.

Antimicrobial use among patients receiving palliative care consultation.

BACKGROUND: We sought to characterize antimicrobial use among patients receiving palliative care consultation. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients seen by the Palliative Care Service at the University of Michigan Health System from January 2008 to May 2008. RESULTS: Of 131 patients seen in consultation, 70 received antimicrobials. We identified 92 infections among these 70 patients; therapy for 54 (58.7%) was empiric. Empiric therapy was most commonly prescribed for respiratory infection and urinary tract infection. Piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) was the most frequently used agent, with 26 patients receiving P/T (37.1%); 22 of 26 received this agent empirically (84.6%, P = .005). Vancomycin was prescribed to 23 patients (32.9%). Sixteen patients (22.9%) died in hospital; another 31 were enrolled in hospice care. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest significant use of empiric, broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy among hospitalized patients near the end of life. We advocate for careful assessment of potential benefits and treatment burdens of antimicrobial therapy, especially when palliation is the goal.

Tube feeding in advanced dementia: an exploratory survey of physician knowledge.

The administration of artificial nutrition by means of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube in older persons in the advanced stages of dementia is commonplace, yet the treatment is associated with significant treatment burdens and unclear benefits in this population. In addition, there is wide and unexplained geographic variability in the use of PEG in advanced dementia, which may stem partly from physicians' lack of understanding about its indications, risks, benefits, and effect on quality of life in advanced dementia. This study was a mail survey undertaken to assess physician knowledge regarding tube feeding in advanced dementia and explore whether certification in geriatrics or other physician characteristics are associated with physician knowledge. To assess knowledge about tube feeding, we asked participants to rate the importance of commonly cited, but non-evidence based, indications for tube feeding in advanced dementia, including recurrent aspiration pneumonia, abnormal swallowing evaluations, abnormal nutritional parameters, preventing an uncomfortable death, and others. Discrepancies between physician knowledge and current evidence regarding tube feeding in advanced dementia were found, indicating a need for improved education ofprimary care physicians in order to ultimately provide better end-of-life care for patients with advanced dementia.