Assessing surgical difficulty in locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer: the accuracy of two MRI-based predictive scores.

AIM: Predicting surgical difficulty is a critical factor in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This study evaluates the accuracy and external validity of a recently published morphometric score to predict surgical difficulty and additionally proposes a new score to identify preoperatively LARC patients with a high risk of having a difficult surgery. METHODS: This is a retrospective study based on the European MRI and Rectal Cancer Surgery (EuMaRCS) database, including patients with mid/low LARC who were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (L-TME) with primary anastomosis. For all patients, pretreatment and restaging MRI were available. Surgical difficulty was graded as high and low based upon a composite outcome, including operative (e.g. duration of surgery) and postoperative variables (e.g. hospital stay). Score accuracy was assessed by estimating sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC). RESULTS: In a total of 136 LARC patients, 17 (12.5%) were graded as high surgical difficulty. The previously published score (calculated on body mass index, intertuberous distance, mesorectal fat area, type of anastomosis) showed low predictive value (sensitivity 11.8%; specificity 92.4%; AROC 0.612). The new EuMaRCS score was developed using the following significant predictors of surgical difficulty: body mass index > 30, interspinous distance < 96.4 mm, ymrT stage ≥ T3b and male sex. It demonstrated high accuracy (AROC 0.802). CONCLUSION: The EuMaRCS score was found to be more sensitive and specific than the previous score in predicting surgical difficulty in LARC patients who are candidates for L-TME. However, this score has yet to be externally validated.

Lymphoscintigraphy in clinical routine practice: reproducibility and accuracy in melanoma patients with a long-term follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: The sentinel node status is the most important single factor determining overall survival for patients with localized melanoma. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (LS) is essential in locating the correct sentinel lymph node (SN) and the reproducibility of the method determines the accuracy of the sentinel node biopsy (SNB). This study aims at determining the reproducibility and accuracy of LS in routine clinical practice after long-term follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and eight melanoma patients with clinically unpredictable lymphatic drainage were prospectively enrolled to undergo two LS. The first LS was performed to determine the site and number of the lymphatic basins to plan SNB anesthesia and the second preoperative LS was to allow SN localization intra-operatively. RESULTS: Lymphatic drainage was demonstrated in all patients. In 84 of 108 cases, both LSs were concordant in terms of site and number of nodal basins visualized. After a median follow-up of 80 months, no nodal recurrence was observed in the five patients with a decreased number of lymph node basins. In the group with increased number of lymph node basins, one patient developed nodal metastases in the same regional lymph node basin visualized by both LS studies. CONCLUSION: LS is an accurate and reproducible method to determine the localization of the sentinel node in the day-to-day routine to clinical practice when primary melanoma is also located in body sites with variable lymphatic drainage.

Sentinel node biopsy for high-risk cutaneous nonanogenital squamous cell carcinoma: a preliminary result.

BACKGROUND: Certain patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) have much higher rates of regional nodal metastases than is often reported. This study aims to further validate sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) for SCC and the outcome of these patients following SNB. METHODS: 20 patients with high-risk nonanogenital SCC who underwent SNB between 1998 and 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. SNB was performed under local or general anesthesia following lymphoscintigraphy and blue dye injection. RESULTS: The median follow-up from SNB was 24 months. Tumor location included the head and neck (n = 11), extremities (n = 9) and trunk (n = 1). One patient had a positive sentinel node. This patient developed parotid metastases 13 months after refusing a complete neck dissection and is alive with progressive disease after 31 months. Two patients developed regional recurrence after negative SNB (1 is alive and disease free, the other died of progressive disease). Of the remaining patients, 15 are alive and disease free, 1 died of another malignancy and 1 was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: SNB for high-risk SCC is feasible and allows early detection and treatment of nodal metastases. Currently, SNB for SCC is not a standard treatment and requires further investigation to determine which patients would benefit best from this procedure.